• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

More crazy!!!

Slumberfreeze

Seasoned Member
Real Person
Male
So this is what I call the "Gospel to the Angels" or "Worship Him, all ye gods"

I have heard some weird teachings concerning angels. Mostly centered around; they don't have free will, or don't have free will any more, or can't repent, or cannot be saved if they rebel. Here's my take.

I believe Psalm 82 is written exclusively to what we would call angels. I base this off of them being referred to a 'gods' and the proclamation against them that "they shall die like men". Telling a man that he will die like a man is not a revelation, but to an angel it is new information! Also saying "all of you are children of the Most High is weird language to speak of rebellious men.

If this is so, (and it totally is) then also in Psalm 82 is an indictment that they are judging unjustly, and showing partiality to the wicked. Following right on its heels is the order to do justice, and deliver the poor and needy. In short, they are told to stop doing wrong, and start doing right. To me that speaks of repentance.

It also mirrors when Enoch records that the angels that sinned petitioned him to intercede for them with God, and God's reply was that they should be interceding for men, not the other way around.

In Psalm 135:14 it says: For the LORD will judge his people, and he will repent himself concerning his servants.

I totally get that this has most of it's application towards us humans. I also get that the word "repent himself" is translated elsewhere as "have compassion on" and I have no issue with either translation. But if He indeed will repent Himself concerning His servants, what is his current attitude concerning His servants?

For this I am drawn to Job 4:18: Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly:

What changes?

Matthew 5:25-26 - Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.

Bear with me here because I'm aware I could be overreaching, but I think I see something else here. On the surface there's no need to try and guess what Jesus means. It's pretty straight up. But spiritually speaking, it carries strange verbiage and imagery. The words "thine adversary" are very comfortably applied to the Devil. This is straaaange to me because the commands to agree with him because we will be shown by the judge to be clearly in the wrong concerning him doesn't work. And if our adversary is God, why then does it refer to the judge as a separate party?

However, if the idiomatic meaning of the scripture is addressed to rebellious (or sinning) angels, their adversary IS God and their judge IS a third party. ( I continue to use the word idiom because I've watched too much Monty Python in my youth and can't be bothered to find the right word.

1 Corinthians 6:3 -Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

It is the saints who will judge the angels. Will there be mercy for them? I say yes based on Jesus' command to judge righteous judgment. (And in my view, in being righteous has an awful lot to do with being merciful, even to the extent of disregarding technicalities like whether or not a miracle was performed on the Sabbath)

I also am reminded of the parable of the unmerciful servant in Matthew 18, where the servant whom had been forgiven failed to cancel the debt of his FELLOW SERVANT, and had his own cancelled debt reinstated.

I think that as redeemed sinners, whom have been perfected by the Author and Finisher of our faith, we're going to be much more lenient in our judgment of the angels than we can appreciate at this time.


As an aside: Paul mentions that we would judge angels like we should already know that. I firmly believe that if that is so it would be shadowed or pictured or typed somewhere in the Old Testament. Does anyone have any insight into this?
 
The whole "angels don't have free will" thing bugged me since I was knee high to a grass hopper. I was like "If angels don't have free will then how did Lucifer sin?"
 
I don't usually comment much, but this thread caught my attention. I have wondered about things like this myself.

slumberfreeze wrote
"As an aside: Paul mentions that we would judge angels like we should already know that. I firmly believe that if that is so it would be shadowed or pictured or typed somewhere in the Old Testament. Does anyone have any insight into this?"

Well, my understanding of this is that angel means messenger. In old testament times, his messengers were called prophets. There is a test for prophets, and applying it would effectively be judging them, as far as whether or not they were what they claimed to be. Today I still believe His people should judge His messengers, those that claim to be representing Him, as in evangelists, pastors, etc.

Those are my thoughts.

My observation is, we are programed from an early age, by prime time TV, Hollywood, and many churchgoers to think an angel is a spirit being, with wings, and our adversary has a pointed tail, and horns, and carries a pitchfork. Jesus told us our adversaries would be those of our own household. So agreeing with them quickly, might not be such a bad idea. Blessed are the peacemakers and all.

I have yet to find a supernatural fallen angel adversary in the bible.
 
UntoldGlory said:
The whole "angels don't have free will" thing bugged me since I was knee high to a grass hopper. I was like "If angels don't have free will then how did Lucifer sin?"

BF should have a 'Like' button.
 
I just had to think of Daniel praying for 21 days and how the angel was fighting against the prince of Persia who would have been Daniel s adversary.

It somehow seemed like limited insight to not believe my adversaries could include more than my household. (Though I have my share there) :(

Or that messengers would be prophets etc. :?:
Or maybe I narrowed your message more than you had intended.
And I am glad you joined the discussion.
Aaron
 
Agree angels must have some free will, otherwise they could not fall and would not need judging.

AmericanIsraelite, who is the devil who tempted Christ in Matthew 4?

I fully agree the stereotypes are ridiculous and harmful. But I believe those stereotypes are encouraged by a real devil, who knows if people expect him to be a comical red horned monster he can more easily deceive them when he actually appears as an angel of light.
 
FollowingHim said:
Agree angels must have some free will, otherwise they could not fall and would not need judging.

AmericanIsraelite, who is the devil who tempted Christ in Matthew 4?

I fully agree the stereotypes are ridiculous and harmful. But I believe those stereotypes are encouraged by a real devil, who knows if people expect him to be a comical red horned monster he can more easily deceive them when he actually appears as an angel of light.

Anyone who doesn't believe that Satan can disguise himself as an angel of light, and fool a lot of people in to thinking that he is, only needs to go into a church and listen to the preacher preach the doctrine of demons by attempting prohibit married men from marrying again. (1 Timothy 4:1-3)
 
FollowingHim wrote
"AmericanIsraelite, who is the devil who tempted Christ in Matthew 4?"

Jer 17:9 says that "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it"
Heb 2:17-18 tell us that Christ was made like us, and was tempted like us.

If Christ was indeed made like us, He had a heart like the one spoken of in Jeremiah, capable of being deceitful and wicked. After 40 days without food, He would have been at a very weak point. He overcame, and we see the record of this in scripture. We see him overcoming the things of the world 1Jn 2:16 calls them the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, things that a wicked, deceiving heart is tempted by.

I think all of us can relate to weak moments, whether drugs, food, sex, greed for power. I believe we all have our own personal adversary built in, and it is for us to overcome. It has helped me tremendously to understand that the temptation comes from within, and is something I can control, through the inspiration and strength of Christ's example.

I have at times in my life made an audible statement to the effect of "I'm not going to do that" or I'm not going there." It makes it more real then to just think it. So I have no problem believing Christ said "Get thee hence" or "Get thee behind me Satan" when Peter's comment was contrary to God's will for Him. His heart may have tempted Him then. We know He prayed in the garden for that cup to be removed....but He placed His will second to the Father's.

Could someone show me where in the Old Testament they find this Satan they believe in?

I better stop now. I tend to get long winded.
 
I believe the serpent in the garden, being a speaking animal, either was a supernatural adversary or was being moved by one.

I believe in Job it is a supenatural adversary that is able to appear before God to accuse Job. It isn't Job's internal dialogue or weaknesses that accused him, it was an outside agent who was self deceived about Job's qualities.

In Daniel 9 Gabriel is resisted by the Prince of Persia for three weeks. How can a mortal adversary withstand an angel of God?

In Zechariah 3, Satan stands beside Joshua the high priest to accuse him. Is Zechariah being offered a glance at Joshua's own internal struggle?

In Ephesians (NT time!) 2 we have reference to "The prince of the power of the air, the spirit which is at work in those who are disobedient"

In John 13, Satan entered into Judas. He didn't form naturally there. He was outside and then came in. If he was outside of Judas, he had to exist in some form independant of Judas. He is not "built in", or a natural occurance of Judas.

In 2 Corinthians 2. Satan is spoken of as having 'schemes' and the possibility exists that he will 'outwit us'

I don't understand the doctrine or the point of trying to allegorize Satan, fallen angels, or demons. I think to do so is completely contrary to the entire scope of scripture, and grants anonymity and cover to our enemy. I would have loved it in school, if my enemies had attributed my actions to their own weaknesses or some such similar untruth. I would punch them in the back of the head all day long while they try to find a way to deal with me without acknowledging me as a thinking, rational person.
 
Lucifer & the rebel Angels...

So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. (Revelation 12:9 NKJV)

Genesis 3
Ezekiel 28:11-19
(I think, these two passages go hand in hand to understand what's really going on with that bad serpent in the garden.)

Isaiah 14:12-15+

Job 1:6-12 (Satan messes with Job; I think this would be a spot to suggest it's where he got the nickname "accuser of the brethren"!)

(Genesis 6) ... I believe Lucifer, aka Satan, had to be either heading this situation up or at the least in on the sinful action!

*i was gonna put a lot more on here bout this fun and important topic but mr slumberfreeze basically rocked it solid already lol so I'll leave it at that :)
 
Slumberfreeze wrote.
"I believe the serpent in the garden, being a speaking animal, either was a supernatural adversary or was being moved by one".

Was Baalam's donkey supernatural? God made the donkey speak. The serpent in the garden was simply a snake, and couldn't have spoken without God. I see it as simply a tool in God's hands. What tempts man, or woman, is their own heart which is wicked, and desires those lusts of the flesh.

Slumberfreeze wrote.
"I believe in Job it is a supenatural adversary that is able to appear before God to accuse Job. It isn't Job's internal dialogue or weaknesses that accused him, it was an outside agent who was self deceived about Job's qualities."

For starters, this supernatural Satan appears to be weak. He was not able to do anything God did not allow. Job gave God credit for everything that happened to him, and God accepted it. The first thing Job says, when everything was destroyed was "The lord gave and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord." Nowhere in the entire book of Job, do we find him giving a "Satan" credit for anything, in fact he restates several times that God had done this to him. Then at the end of the book, we have God Himself giving Job's testimony His stamp of approval.
Let's suppose I have a remodeling business. I remodel houses. I take a wrecking bar out of my tool chest, and I tear apart a wall. Someone looking on wouldn't say "Look what that wrecking bar has done!" I would take the credit for the job. In Job God didn't blame a wrecking bar (Satan) and neither did Job. All things are tools in His hands, used for His glory.

In Isaiah 45:7 God makes it clear that He creates evil, and if you look up that Hebrew word it is very inclusive.

Slumberfreeze wrote
"In Daniel 9 Gabriel is resisted by the Prince of Persia for three weeks. How can a mortal adversary withstand an angel of God?"

That is actually in Daniel 10 and it states that the prince of Persia withstood the messenger, but definitely does not say anything about a supernatural adversary.

Slumberfreeze wrote
"In Zechariah 3, Satan stands beside Joshua the high priest to accuse him. Is Zechariah being offered a glance at Joshua's own internal struggle?"

This is a vision, and yes, Zechariah saw an adversary. Some see dragons with seven heads and ten horns in visions. These things are symbolic, and I doubt any such beast exists. The Chaldean word sawtawn was transliterated (same phonetic sounds) by translators, instead of being translated (same meaning rendered) this is unfortunate. They also added capitalization making "Satan" appear a proper noun.

Slumberfreeze wrote
"In Ephesians (NT time!) 2 we have reference to "The prince of the power of the air, the spirit which is at work in those who are disobedient"

In Ephesians 2:1-3 it reads "And you hath he quickened, and were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in time past in the lust of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." I only see evil motivation, and an uncircumcised heart.

Mark 7:15 Jesus said "There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things that come out of him, those are they that defile the man. v20 "That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, theft, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blaspheme, pride, foolishness: all these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

Slumberfreeze wrote
"I don't understand the doctrine or the point of trying to allegorize Satan, fallen angels, or demons. I think to do so is completely contrary to the entire scope of scripture, and grants anonymity and cover to our enemy. I would have loved it in school, if my enemies had attributed my actions to their own weaknesses or some such similar untruth. I would punch them in the back of the head all day long while they try to find a way to deal with me without acknowledging me as a thinking, rational person."

The way I see it, it is this "doctrine of demons" (yes, there is more then one way to understand that verse) that grants anonymity and cover to the real enemies, namely those who choose to let their evil hearts control their actions. God always lays the sin on the sinner, never on some "Satan."

A few more examples come to mind. God hardened Pharaoh's heart. No devil needed. Daniel when praying was confessing the sins of the people, and acknowledging that it was God who had brought all of their troubles upon them, for their disobedience. Again, no devil needed. I could go on and on.
I am amazed at how one can hardly be a Christian in good standing, without believing in the devil. Division happens where different doctrines are held. Many people do not share my beliefs, and I am well aware of that. I still consider them Christians. In the pursuit of truth, doctrines must stand or fall based on their scriptural foundation, or lack of it. Tradition is no substitute for truth.
 
Rustywest4 wrote
"Lucifer & the rebel Angels...

So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. (Revelation 12:9 NKJV)"

Read revelation 1:1 It might change your mind about whether or not those verses apply.

Look up Lucifer in a concordance. It is very illuminating.
 
Very interesting, I find it fascinating how you can interpret these passages so differently. I'm not agreeing with you, just interested!

What about the many references Jesus made to Satan? Luke 10:18 for instance "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven".

Satan as referred to in Job is weak, in that he is weaker than God and can only work within the bounds set for him by God, but that is reasonable as God is sovereign and will always be stronger than him. If Satan is a fallen angel as per the standard interpretation, he is weaker than God as he is only an angel. And he was also created by God, who knows all, so knew he would fall, and created him anyway... So yes he could be called a tool of God, to test the elect. Which is consistent with Isaiah 45:7 as you have referred to. But that in itself doesn't contradict the standard interpretation of him being a literal being.
I am amazed at how one can hardly be a Christian in good standing, without believing in the devil.
Well you can hardly be a Christian in good standing without believing in exclusive monogamy either, so this isn't that surprising! :D
 
AmericanIsraelite said:
God always lays the sin on the sinner, never on some "Satan."

Then Peter said, "Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land?

Really though. Really. I actually started this topic to have a discussion about how the judgment of rebel angels will go down, and to see if anyone was intersted in showing me me some Old Testament imagery that foreshadows Paul's teaching on the subject. I thank you for begging the question about whether or not they exist as anything more than a figure of speech, but that really isn't the focus I intended. If you would like to start a new topic to debate the non-existance of a personal Satan, I will meet you there.
 
Ya ... Back to your original thoughts Mr. Slumberfreeze (which are spot on in my opinion) ...

I think that unless one has an understanding of what went on with the rebel Angels in Genesis 6 in the ancient world (like 2nd Peter chapter 2 elaborates on), then it's difficult to truly understand the history of man, especially Israel's journey and what they were up against in the surrounding pagan cultures!

But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day; as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. (‭Jude‬ ‭1‬:‭5-7‬ NKJV)
 
Back
Top