That is the Argument From Motive fallacy. It has absolutely nothing to do with you having issues with HPT.
I don't believe you. For you, HPT is part of your faith and probably identity. This is why you so sticky with HPT. I doubt are even able to try to become more objective toward HPT because any issues with HPT will cause identity/faith crisis with you.
Here is test. Provide at least one issue/evidence against HPT. No theory is perfect, so there must be some anomalies.
Abillity to remember the past. It has nothing to do with physics. It has everything to do with Wolfram's ridiculous assertions.
Well we can agree that time is moving forward. Wolfram seems to be arguing that time is some crazy complex geometric calculation that goes in multiple directions, and only SEEMS to move forward. I would argue that is seems to move forward because it does move forward.
No, we can't agree that time moves forward. Maybe time goes backwards in special cases, however brain's intepretation is always time going forward.
You are entered into epistemiology.
NOBODY SEES REALITY AS IT IS BECAUSE WE ARE LIMITED BY OUR SENSES THEMSELVES AND SENSE-MAKING BRAIN/MIND PROCESSES.
You don't see moving object where it is. You see prediction of where brain thinks moving object will be. Why? Because info of moving objects doesn't show automatically and immediately in mind. Info must travel by light, then by nerves and into info-processing part of brain which means that info-processing part receives past, not now.
Therefore before mind becomes aware, brain must make prediction where object is now before making any decision what to do with object.
Imagine playing ping pong without ball's location prediction. You will always miss ball.
Nope! Can't change the past. All we can do is do our part to affect the future. The past is enjoyable to look back at and reminisence. How many people, if they could go back and change the past, would do so. Perhaps your parents or mine might have married other people, Back to the Future style, and then you or I would vanish as if we had never existed "It's A Wonderful Life" style. I don't now what the future holds, but I do know who holds the future!
You can't prove it's impossible because as per Karl Popper we can't prove any scientific theory. We can only prove they are false.
Yeah, I wouldn't boast about that, if I were you.
I saw what my whole class didn't. I just didn't do full math correctly.
Time travel is and will always remain in the realm of science fiction.
See my Karl Popper comment.
Ugh! Time dilation is a farce!
Seriously! We have already dealt with this nonsense. It is not falsifiable. Einstein was wrong! Time is the same for everybody, There is a past and there is a future, and there is a chain of events that has happened, is happening, and will happen, and only God and those whom He chooses to reveal it to, can know the future.
So your contribution is zero evidence backing your claims. Which means you don't have them?
Also again epistemiology. Brain can perceive time as same for everybody which means we may not see time going backwards naturally. To notice time going backwards would require physics theory allowing time being negative and very devious experiment with only one reasonable explanation.
Again, just before 20th man couldn't fly, doesn't mean man's flying is impossible, only that then current knowledge and methods were inadequate for flight. Or motivation was missing in people.
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Einstein based his ideas on the deeply flawed theories of relativity. He denied the existence of the ether. We know though, that the ether DOES exist.
What ether has with relativity?
Einstein's theories deal with macro scale, not nano and below. If prediction on macro scale are correct then theory is useful.
And even if one prediction is wrong, it doesn't mean rest is garbage.
Even if our understanding is wrong why heat and temperature exist, doesn't mean that all knowledge involving heat and temperature is wrong.
Correction: based on establishment ideas. Prove me wrong! Go ahead and manipulate time! We have had decades to work out this problem. Go ahead! Move forward or backwards in time. Meanwhile, I will take it one day at a time and be grateful for each day that God gives me, and for the fact that He allowed me to be born at this time and place, where we can explore the world that He has fiven us.
Paragraf proving you see our "questioning of your scientific paradigm" as personal "attack on your faith". You have tendecy not to provide scientific proof, but to speak about your faith.
Also see my comment about before 20th century flight for time manipulation.
Cum Hoc fallacy.
They proved a "clock" moved faster. Post Hoc fallacy.
Incorrect usage. Just because A happened before B, doesn't mean A is cause of B. However, causality requires A happening before B which implies such fallacies are only cautions in thinking.
Also, zero useful info why experiment with clock is wrong. Claiming fallacy isn't scientific proof.
For everything I don't like, I claim fallacy (or farce) seems your modus operandi.
I have never denied Red shift or gravitational lensing. Red shift is evidence that God stretched out the heavens. Gravitationallensing is not caused by this hocus pocus curvature of space time. It is caused by the very thing that Einstein denied exists. There is a very real ZPE as has been verified by the Kassimir experiment.
Lord doing something isn't scientific proof.
Science deals with natural causes, in another word something caused by events, materials etc... in nature itself. It has zero with Lord's activities.
Nikota Tesla beat me to it.
Maybe Tesla was one wrong here. After all, experiments prove Tesla wrong here.
Btw, how it's possible to create totally bonkers theory as per Tesla which still provides good predictions?
Well that is not what we are discussing. signal processing is very complex and requires knowledge of the past, but cannot rely on predictions of the future.
They matter. If mathemathics allows negative time, then physists have to prove going backwards is impossible.
www.scientificamerican.com