Tlaloc
Member
In Torah keepers secret name Mark made a passing comment that male homosexuality was considered an abomination rather than a sin. He commented briefly that that sounds worse to him, and it sounds worse to me too, but I can't seem to pin down exactly what it is. For the sake of better understanding scripture and hopefully getting better anti-gay arguments I humbly request a pooling of knowledge and study resources on this topic. Here we have finely capable students of scripture from a variety of backgrounds, I believe that if everyone contributes we can have a more clear understanding of just whats going on.
What I have so far is the raw Strong's data and some English information. There are three Hebrew roots that have all been dumped into the one English word abomination. I hate when translators do that, they should at least leave a mark, heads up everyone this is really three different concepts but I think there similar so I'm going to call them the same thing. So, here they are in their anglified enunciation form (as I don't have a Hebrew script set on my computer right now)
H6292 Pig-gool: 4 instances. This one is easy and I doubt it needs any further study. Any guesses? Anyone?
It deals with putrid, fetid, unclean foods. Each time its talking about food unfit to eat.
H8263 Sheh-kets: 11 instances. Strong's says this is related to filth foremost, and secondarily idolatrous objects. Almost every instance of this is in Leviticus. It doesn't seem like things in this category are in and of themselves bad. Eagles are this kind of abomination. They are a fine noble creature, but don't eat them. Actually every time it's used its dealing with things you shouldn't eat.
Those two roots are pretty straightforward, and I would submit that abomination is the wrong word for these things as we would think of them today.
H8441 To-ay-baw: 117 instances. Needless to say, this is the one I'm looking for details on. Strong says it's something disgusting or hated. It may also deal with idolatry. The Egyptians thought eating with Hebrew's or shepherds (possibly Hyskos related) was this. Male homosexuality is this. Idolatry is this. You're not supposed to allow it or anyone considered it into you're house. Sacrificing a blemished or bad flavoured critter to the Lord was this. All dark magic related stuff was this. Cross dressing was this. Using prostitutes was this. Marrying, divorcing, going back to husband #1 was this. Justifying the wicked is this. Pride is this. The ways, thoughts, and sacrifices of wicked people are this.
English abomination as defined right now deals exclusively with something hated and loathed. As far as I'm concerned these things aren't wrong because people, including myself, don't like them. God himself hating these things isn't a reason on its own, simply because my God doesn't hate anything for no additional reason. Fortunately the term abomination was there since the 1611, so the modern definition isn't the important one. Thank God for dictionary.com, which pools information about language quickly for us to access. Abomination is broken down into ab, which means off, and omin, which roots to omen. Literately, a bad omen. That fits the pattern to me because of how many times the prophets say to Israel or Judea, you saw these abominations happening you should've known this would happen. As far I'm concerned that fits, but it isn't the why.
Here is where I really need the work, the additional insight, the criticism, the collaboration. I need this section to be up to scratch to present to the pro gay people (which I do have to argue with in person) or else to be scratched as speculation or outright wrong. An obscure definition of abomination is 'A cause of pollution or wickedness.' wickedness we know, pollution is the act of making something unfit for living things or people. I feel that's important, but ultimately I'm not interested in what abomination means, its To-ay-baw I need to know about.
Lev 18:27 (for all these abominations have the men of the land done that were before you and the land is defiled)
This refers back to the sexual laws. Why I mentioned pollution earlier is that defiled here deals with contamination and pollution. Of course this is in a moral sense, but it can also be in a physical sense too. Of course whether we're talking about 1600 AD or BC the pollution we're talking about is not like the mines of Uranium City or carbon emissions or all the gad danged light people use to block out the stars at night and keep them safely cooped up from Gods vast and wonderful creation. Pollution in this time deals with things that cause or spread disease like a corpse or feces or contagious sickness. A plague city or fresh battlefield would be greatly polluted.
So, if I'm right in what God means here and God is right about what he said (that at least is a given) then we should expect sicknesses clearly associated with male homosexuality, incest, infidelity, prostitution, and bestiality. We should also see in history and except to see again any culture that leaves these things unchecked being overtaken by another culture either from within or without. This is mostly because people make a culture and people who do those things will tend to die or not have kids by natural course. ¿Blythe's natural selection right? I'm talking over the course of centuries or at least decades, but still.
The evidence that all of those five behaviours spreads disease or outright creates it(New genetic disease from incest and new to human disease by bestiality) it is overwhelming. Male homosexuality has an assortment of non viral diseases associated with it too because of, er, what they do. VERY interestingly when I've been reviewing statics by the Catholic medical board (I must find that link again) they condemned female homosexuality but only had a vague statement that more sexually transmitted infections occurred. I found it odd that they didn't comment on which infections where more common, then it dawned on me why. Yeast infections would transmit at a massive rate, but they are not at all serious or critical and citing them would only help people who tolerated female homosexual behaviour in some circumstances. That's my guess, as I said, they didn't present the actual data.
So, thats where I'm at right now. I want to get to a point where I can confidently say that this is a major reason why God is against gays, but this is preliminary research right now so help filling it out or tearing bad stuff down would be greatly appreciated.
What I have so far is the raw Strong's data and some English information. There are three Hebrew roots that have all been dumped into the one English word abomination. I hate when translators do that, they should at least leave a mark, heads up everyone this is really three different concepts but I think there similar so I'm going to call them the same thing. So, here they are in their anglified enunciation form (as I don't have a Hebrew script set on my computer right now)
H6292 Pig-gool: 4 instances. This one is easy and I doubt it needs any further study. Any guesses? Anyone?
It deals with putrid, fetid, unclean foods. Each time its talking about food unfit to eat.
H8263 Sheh-kets: 11 instances. Strong's says this is related to filth foremost, and secondarily idolatrous objects. Almost every instance of this is in Leviticus. It doesn't seem like things in this category are in and of themselves bad. Eagles are this kind of abomination. They are a fine noble creature, but don't eat them. Actually every time it's used its dealing with things you shouldn't eat.
Those two roots are pretty straightforward, and I would submit that abomination is the wrong word for these things as we would think of them today.
H8441 To-ay-baw: 117 instances. Needless to say, this is the one I'm looking for details on. Strong says it's something disgusting or hated. It may also deal with idolatry. The Egyptians thought eating with Hebrew's or shepherds (possibly Hyskos related) was this. Male homosexuality is this. Idolatry is this. You're not supposed to allow it or anyone considered it into you're house. Sacrificing a blemished or bad flavoured critter to the Lord was this. All dark magic related stuff was this. Cross dressing was this. Using prostitutes was this. Marrying, divorcing, going back to husband #1 was this. Justifying the wicked is this. Pride is this. The ways, thoughts, and sacrifices of wicked people are this.
English abomination as defined right now deals exclusively with something hated and loathed. As far as I'm concerned these things aren't wrong because people, including myself, don't like them. God himself hating these things isn't a reason on its own, simply because my God doesn't hate anything for no additional reason. Fortunately the term abomination was there since the 1611, so the modern definition isn't the important one. Thank God for dictionary.com, which pools information about language quickly for us to access. Abomination is broken down into ab, which means off, and omin, which roots to omen. Literately, a bad omen. That fits the pattern to me because of how many times the prophets say to Israel or Judea, you saw these abominations happening you should've known this would happen. As far I'm concerned that fits, but it isn't the why.
Here is where I really need the work, the additional insight, the criticism, the collaboration. I need this section to be up to scratch to present to the pro gay people (which I do have to argue with in person) or else to be scratched as speculation or outright wrong. An obscure definition of abomination is 'A cause of pollution or wickedness.' wickedness we know, pollution is the act of making something unfit for living things or people. I feel that's important, but ultimately I'm not interested in what abomination means, its To-ay-baw I need to know about.
Lev 18:27 (for all these abominations have the men of the land done that were before you and the land is defiled)
This refers back to the sexual laws. Why I mentioned pollution earlier is that defiled here deals with contamination and pollution. Of course this is in a moral sense, but it can also be in a physical sense too. Of course whether we're talking about 1600 AD or BC the pollution we're talking about is not like the mines of Uranium City or carbon emissions or all the gad danged light people use to block out the stars at night and keep them safely cooped up from Gods vast and wonderful creation. Pollution in this time deals with things that cause or spread disease like a corpse or feces or contagious sickness. A plague city or fresh battlefield would be greatly polluted.
So, if I'm right in what God means here and God is right about what he said (that at least is a given) then we should expect sicknesses clearly associated with male homosexuality, incest, infidelity, prostitution, and bestiality. We should also see in history and except to see again any culture that leaves these things unchecked being overtaken by another culture either from within or without. This is mostly because people make a culture and people who do those things will tend to die or not have kids by natural course. ¿Blythe's natural selection right? I'm talking over the course of centuries or at least decades, but still.
The evidence that all of those five behaviours spreads disease or outright creates it(New genetic disease from incest and new to human disease by bestiality) it is overwhelming. Male homosexuality has an assortment of non viral diseases associated with it too because of, er, what they do. VERY interestingly when I've been reviewing statics by the Catholic medical board (I must find that link again) they condemned female homosexuality but only had a vague statement that more sexually transmitted infections occurred. I found it odd that they didn't comment on which infections where more common, then it dawned on me why. Yeast infections would transmit at a massive rate, but they are not at all serious or critical and citing them would only help people who tolerated female homosexual behaviour in some circumstances. That's my guess, as I said, they didn't present the actual data.
So, thats where I'm at right now. I want to get to a point where I can confidently say that this is a major reason why God is against gays, but this is preliminary research right now so help filling it out or tearing bad stuff down would be greatly appreciated.