Hmmm. This is a common objection. However, it does appear worthy of further examination.
As I read the story, it appears at least possible, perhaps probable, that what Lamech related to his wives was a story of self-defense. That isn't quite the same thing as murder.
Further, if we want to apply this "rule of first mention", in all fairness we ought to do so uniformly, don't you think?
Lamech was also the father of those who live in portable dwellings and tend livestock. Anyone have a moral issue with cowboys or sheep herders?
Another of his children started the harp & flute playing business. Is music immoral?
A third son originated metal craft -- working in bronze & iron. Is there anything immoral about creating or using your silverware? Car? Wearing a belt-buckle?
It seems that this argument, aside from likely being inaccurate, just makes no particular sense.
It is much like the argument that, in the Garden, God's creation of just one woman proves that one man - one woman is God's ideal. Answer: Yup. And they lived naked in an orchard with no buildings. Is that also our standard for God's approval? Response: *Sputter, sputter!*
If anything, the story of Lamech seems to suggest that growing up in a plural family just might spark unusual creativity!
Related FAQ Topics:
Why Not Adam, Eve, and Suzie?
Related Discussions: