• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Islam's 20 Step Plan to Undermine America?

Dr. K.R. Allen

Member
Real Person
I found this article from a very credible scholar. This is worth all of us considering.

Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America
by Dr. Anis Shorrosh


When we immigrated from Jerusalem, Jordan* in January, 1967, little did I imagine that Islam would become center-stage in world news. As my sincere interest in the growth of Islam in America intensified, I began to discuss, dialogue, and then debate Muslim leaders throughout the world from an Arab Christian's view of Islam. So far, I have had the privilege of participating in over 20 debates and discussions on every continent plus T.V. and radio. "Islam Revealed" was released in 1988 and is now in its 8th printing. The True Furqan is now in its third printing in the three years it has been published. It is the only book which challenges the Quran in substance, style, language and contents.

This is my analysis of the Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020! Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?

1. Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it with hate crime bills state-wide and nation-wide.

2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities to promote Islam as the original African-American's religion while Christianity is for the whites! Strange enough, no one tells the African-Americans that it was the Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves, neither the fact that in Arabic the word for black and slave is the same, "Abed."

3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office for favorable legislation to Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the internet by buying the corporations or a controlling stock.

6. Yield to the fear of imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America - the black gold. America's economy depends on oil, (1000 products are derived from oil), so does its personal and industrial transportation and manufacturing -41% comes from the Middle East.

7. Yell, "foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran" anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions, get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?

9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:

a. Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961)

b. No birth control whatsoever - every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.

c. Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years - since one cannot have the Muslim legal permission to marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.

d. Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2000 released inmates have joined Al Qaida world-wide). Only a few have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. So far - sleeping cells!

10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 exclusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution.

11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish "Centers for Islamic studies" with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions.

12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam hijacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America's high schools--free. They would never allow us to reciprocate.

13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.)

15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American's justice system.

16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only.

18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility.

19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.

* Jerusalem was held by Jordan from 1948 when it attacked Israel until 1967, when it again attacked Israel.

Dr. Anis Shorrosh, D.Min, D.Phil, and a member of Oxford Society of Scholars, has traveled in 76 countries. He is a Palestinian Arab Christian American, who is an author, lecturer and producer of TV documentaries. He is author of the best-seller "Islam Revealed" and his tenth book - "Islam: A Threat or a Challenge." - was published in the spring, 2003.
 
Re: Islam's Plan to Undermine America?

they are pretty much on target for their goals, aren't they?
i mean, nothing on that list is a utopian dream that they have not made progress on.
and to think that we started the country by founding it on our beliefs and have failed to keep it focused
 
I have to tell you that if Obama had his way Saudi Arabia would be much more Christian friendly than America.

At least you can say man with man sex is wrong in Saudi Arabia.

If Obama had his way anyone who said man with man sex is wrong would be thrown in jail, or worse.

That means if Obama had his way all the fake Christians could stay out of jail and all the real Christians would be executed.

The Muslim religion is much closer to authentic Christianity than the religion spread by the type of Americans who voted for Obama who often teach direct anti-Christianity, while pretending to be Christians.

True Christianity spreads much faster (per true Christian already present in the country) in Muslim countries than in America in my opinion, because you can tell the difference between true Christians and false Christians a lot easier in Muslim countries than in the abominations of Obamanations. Furthermore Muslim's are not programmed to have itching ears for a "Christian" to tell them God loves Adulterers go and commit Adultery like many American "Christians."

By the way Obama is not a Muslim, he opposed numerous Muslim teachings that agree with Christian teachings.
 
DiscussingTheTopic said:
I have to tell you that if Obama had his way Saudi Arabia would be much more Christian friendly than America.

At least you can say man with man sex is wrong in Saudi Arabia.

If Obama had his way anyone who said man with man sex is wrong would be thrown in jail, or worse.

That means if Obama had his way all the fake Christians could stay out of jail and all the real Christians would be executed.

The Muslim religion is much closer to authentic Christianity than the religion spread by the type of Americans who voted for Obama who often teach direct anti-Christianity, while pretending to be Christians.

True Christianity spreads much faster (per true Christian already present in the country) in Muslim countries than in America in my opinion, because you can tell the difference between true Christians and false Christians a lot easier in Muslim countries than in the abominations of Obamanations. Furthermore Muslim's are not programmed to have itching ears for a "Christian" to tell them God loves Adulterers go and commit Adultery like many American "Christians."

By the way Obama is not a Muslim, he opposed numerous Muslim teachings that agree with Christian teachings.

Wow....Obama is the reason for everything wrong in the US? He works fast eh???
Can I have some references for this stuff about authentic Christianity is Muslim countries please? Or where on earth you got this idea from? Has any US president ever tried to repeal the gay sex legalistation laws in the last few years? I needs stats, my head is about to explode from all the real valid facts you have just presented.
 
If you start interfering with our hyperbole and obamabashing, we will take our toys and go play somewhere else!
 
Seth said:
If you start interfering with our hyperbole and obamabashing, we will take our toys and go play somewhere else!

Hehe :D
 
While this video is already a couple of years old I think it is right on the money...in fact what it is talking about IS coming to pass as can be seen SINCE this video was made. What baffles me is that most people just throw their hands up in the air and say "well there is nothing I can do about it".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

Hey! I just had an epiphany! I figured it out! Islam is behind the anti-polygamy and bigamy laws. They intentionally brainwashed the seventh century Christians so they would not take more than one wife so they could catch up with their population eventually and therefore overtake the world! They even came up with the gay marriage agenda to throw off suspicion and distract us from their real mission as well as introducing an interesting method of population control. Wow, that was kind of fun, I've never developed a conspiracy theory before, I wonder if it will catch on... ; )
 
I've never developed a conspiracy theory before, I wonder if it will catch on... ; )
well......gulp (looking nervously around)
(whispers)...what if it is the same biblical feller that invented islam that did all that conspiracy stuff that yer talkin bout?
gotta go, just cause i'm paranoid does not mean that they are not after me!
 
Isabella said:
DiscussingTheTopic said:
I have to tell you that if Obama had his way Saudi Arabia would be much more Christian friendly than America.

At least you can say man with man sex is wrong in Saudi Arabia.

If Obama had his way anyone who said man with man sex is wrong would be thrown in jail, or worse.

That means if Obama had his way all the fake Christians could stay out of jail and all the real Christians would be executed.

The Muslim religion is much closer to authentic Christianity than the religion spread by the type of Americans who voted for Obama who often teach direct anti-Christianity, while pretending to be Christians.

True Christianity spreads much faster (per true Christian already present in the country) in Muslim countries than in America in my opinion, because you can tell the difference between true Christians and false Christians a lot easier in Muslim countries than in the abominations of Obamanations. Furthermore Muslim's are not programmed to have itching ears for a "Christian" to tell them God loves Adulterers go and commit Adultery like many American "Christians."

By the way Obama is not a Muslim, he opposed numerous Muslim teachings that agree with Christian teachings.

Wow....Obama is the reason for everything wrong in the US? He works fast eh???
Can I have some references for this stuff about authentic Christianity is Muslim countries please? Or where on earth you got this idea from? Has any US president ever tried to repeal the gay sex legalistation laws in the last few years? I needs stats, my head is about to explode from all the real valid facts you have just presented.

No, not just Obama also other people with similar ethical views to him. He just happens to be a more recent example, I could say Democrats or Liberals. But someone would accuse me of steriotyping them.

I said "If Obama had his way." He is not the cause of everything wrong in America because he is not given enough power to do so. If he had his way America would be much worse off for Christians, obviously he is not getting his way in everything.
 
Again, I ask for citations as to his 'agenda'? I want facts....not suppositions. Putting 'if' and 'I think' in front of spurious accusations does not make them any less bogus.

I would like some critical thinking and not hysterical accusations, it is very tiresome to read through.
 
Dunno what dtt said that agitated, but if I might be his apologetic.
I think it's fair to say that Obama supports gay rights. Further, it seems that politically correct speaking is a precept of his party. The conclusion is that laws like hate speech, will continue to grow in power, and that eventually these two ideas will intertwine sufficiently for people who oppose gays, to be accused of hate speech, which will be considered a crime because it is inflamatory and inciting of violence against the protected class. Real christians being executed is probably an exaggeration but incarcerated certainly seems likely. Contempt of court, currently can cause you to be incarcerated and when the court issues a ban on you speaking ill of homosexuality, you'll be incarcerated.
His statements about islam and christianity having similarities I think is a fair assertion from the righteous works viewpoint. If you take a look at the standards for purity and holiness as promoted by both, they have much in common. If you really only focus on the nt teachings of grace and love then that may not be obvious. But for those that observe much of the ot as how to live their life, then they have more in common with conservative muslims, than in modern liberal christianity. As to the daily living activities and style of life, not as to foundational concepts.
The statement about his version of christianity spreading more effectively in muslim countries than here, likewise makes sense. They both abhor the same sort of activities, and encourage purity and righteousness. Whereas modern american christianity is seen either as being a sunday hobby, or of so much grace, that there is little of merit in the ot. So given the choice to pursue a happy feel good faith, or one that borders on legalism and is reminscent of pharisees, many reject "authentic" christianity.
I hope that is acceptable for explanation for you :)
 
In whatever the points lets make sure we stay respectful here.

DTT be careful there with the excessive CAPS and ALL BOLDS as that can be taken as yelling through the computer screen. ;)
 
Isabella said:
Again, I ask for citations as to his 'agenda'? I want facts....not suppositions. Putting 'if' and 'I think' in front of spurious accusations does not make them any less bogus.

I would like some critical thinking and not hysterical accusations, it is very tiresome to read through.

Would you agree with the following statement, if not please revise details and or explain what the definition of a hate crime is

1. Every time you push someone down the stairs with the goal of injuring them it is not a hate crime. Since pushing someone down the stairs to injure them is already illegal but an additional hate crime law must be added to cover hate crimes.

2. There must be some way to determine if a crime like pushing someone down the stairs is a hate crime, or if it was really motivated by love or indifference, in order to decide if the person should be charged twice or only once for the same action.

3. Since you can not read their mind. The way to determine if a crime is a hate crime is if the person expressed words of hatred toward the "hate-group" the person is in.

4. Saying violent acts should be done to a group of people can be considered a hate crime (done by the speaker) if someone other than the speaker later commits the violent acts but the speaker does not.

5. Obama and a large number of democrats are in support of hate crime legislation
 
Seth said:
So given the choice to pursue a happy feel good faith, or one that borders on legalism and is reminscent of pharisees, many reject "authentic" christianity.
I hope that is acceptable for explanation for you :)

Are you saying that my Christianity is not authentic because it is legalistic?

Or are you agreeing with me that immorality promoting Christianity is not genuine Christianity?

Or other?
 
Agree or disagree

1.
Christians are allowed to follow Leviticus 20:13 literally and precisely in Saudi Arabia but not in the United States [so long as no one knows they are Christians and no one knows they got it from the OT instead of literature approved by a large number of Muslims?]

2.
Christians are allowed to teach other people to follow Leviticus 20:13 literally and precisely in Saudi Arabia but not in the United States [so long as no one knows they are Christians and no one knows they got it from the OT instead of literature approved by a large number of Muslims?]

By the way me simply saying that someone is not permitted to teach leviticus 20:13 (by the government) is not the same as me teaching leviticus 20:13, but it is also not the same as me teaching against leviticus 20:13.
 
DiscussingTheTopic said:
Isabella said:
Again, I ask for citations as to his 'agenda'? I want facts....not suppositions. Putting 'if' and 'I think' in front of spurious accusations does not make them any less bogus.

I would like some critical thinking and not hysterical accusations, it is very tiresome to read through.

Would you agree with the following statement, if not please revise details and or explain what the definition of a hate crime is

1. Every time you push someone down the stairs with the goal of injuring them it is not a hate crime. Since pushing someone down the stairs to injure them is already illegal but an additional hate crime law must be added to cover hate crimes.

2. There must be some way to determine if a crime like pushing someone down the stairs is a hate crime, or if it was really motivated by love or indifference, in order to decide if the person should be charged twice or only once for the same action.

3. Since you can not read their mind. The way to determine if a crime is a hate crime is if the person expressed words of hatred toward the "hate-group" the person is in.

4. Saying violent acts should be done to a group of people can be considered a hate crime (done by the speaker) if someone other than the speaker later commits the violent acts but the speaker does not.

5. Obama and a large number of democrats are in support of hate crime legislation

I will answer yours, if you answer mine.

Do not try to blindside me with your own agenda.

I asked you to support your previous posts, please do so or else do not bother to reply to me.

Bels
 
I was just using terminology that each group would use to describe the other :) No offense intended. On the spectrum there are those that are all nt love and grace, and other end is all law and holiness/purity, and ne'er shall the twain meet. Well actually hopefully that can appreciate and respect the viewpoint of the other....As to where I'm at on spectrum still deciding! To most I probably seem legalistic, to some I'm a soft pedaling love addict, spewing grace and compassion like the silliest hippies ;)
 
By the way someone (who is not paranoid and is in fact extremely trusting of the government) told me that if you ever go on a website ending in gov the government will keep a record of some number that goes with your computer every time you go online from that point onward, which may be used to help "fight terrorism." I am not saying if that is true or not, anyway I already went on websites ending in gov in the past before they told me this.

How would you get much more official about Obama then a whitehouse website while he is president?

"President Obama also continues to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity."


http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/civil-rights

the above website was accessed as of september 15 2010 (I mention this because websites change from time to time)

And now for my explanation of how this shows that Obama would desire to have legal action taken against real Christians.

ENDA could potentially mean if a Christian employer believes they should have the right to refuse to hire homosexual men, to do ministry in their 501c3 Church they could face legal punishment.

ENDA could also potentially mean if a Christian man feels that his male employee should not dress as a woman and use the woman's bathroom and scare off women customers who are "prejudice" against cross dressing men using their restrooms, the employer could face legal prosecution if he discriminated against keeping the cross dresser employed.

In effect Obama desires that Christians can be legally punished if they discriminate against sexual orientation with their money. Have you ever heard the saying "put your money where your mouth is?"

Therefor Obama wishes to discriminate against Christians who follow Biblical Christianity or just do not want the women customers scared away :oops:

If ENDA has no legal punishment to go with lawbreakers then it might as well not be a law so Obama wishes to punish Christians who are against male homosexuality with legal action.

On the other hand in Saudi Arabia it is fine to refuse to hire a man if he has sex with other men, at least if they are serious about the Muslim religion in Saudi government.
 
DiscussingTheTopic said:
"President Obama also continues to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity."

Aaaah, ok, because earlier you wrote:

DiscussingTheTopic said:
If Obama had his way anyone who said man with man sex is wrong would be thrown in jail, or worse.

That means if Obama had his way all the fake Christians could stay out of jail and all the real Christians would be executed.

So, in your mind equal employment rights equals the death penalty? That is is Obama, more than anyone else in government or the public that wishes to expressily see Christian heads roll....I bet he is in the white house rubbing his hands with glee imagining the increase in executions for the additional crime of 'Employment Discrimination due to Sexual and gender identity'.

Can you supply any precedence for this? There has been equal rights law wrt gender, ethnic minorities and religion for a while, can you point out some citations where people who have been breaking those laws have been executed for their crime? As a small business woman I need to know which forms of discrimination I can indulge in without risking execution.

Please, I seriously need your help here.....
 
Isabella said:
DiscussingTheTopic said:
"President Obama also continues to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity."

Aaaah, ok, because earlier you wrote:

DiscussingTheTopic said:
If Obama had his way anyone who said man with man sex is wrong would be thrown in jail, or worse.

That means if Obama had his way all the fake Christians could stay out of jail and all the real Christians would be executed.

So, in your mind equal employment rights equals the death penalty? That is is Obama, more than anyone else in government or the public that wishes to expressily see Christian heads roll....I bet he is in the white house rubbing his hands with glee imagining the increase in executions for the additional crime of 'Employment Discrimination due to Sexual and gender identity'.

Can you supply any precedence for this? There has been equal rights law wrt gender, ethnic minorities and religion for a while, can you point out some citations where people who have been breaking those laws have been executed for their crime? As a small business woman I need to know which forms of discrimination I can indulge in without risking execution.

Please, I seriously need your help here.....

So I am not saying that this is evidence that he would give the death penalty. This is merely evidence that he would legally punish real Christians for doing real Christianity.

Obama does not openly yell out that he plans to exterminate all real Christians in a bold campaign speech on live television, he prefers to be more subtle than that you know. Otherwise how will he get people who actually like to pretend they are Christians on surveys to vote for him. A lot of Church going fake-Christians voted for him you know.

Anyway I can not currently prove his intention to murder, only show evidence of his intention to keep them from practicing real Christianity and to punish them with legal action if they practice real Christianity.

Which form of murder is worse for the individual being murdered

1. To allow someone to live on earth, but lead their path to an eternal lake of burning fire

or

2. To kill someone and accidentally send them to good eternal life.


I also can not prove his intention to murder Christians. But I can show evidence that he is willing to try to legalize murder of babies who have done no crime worthy of death, an offense far worse than killing adult Christians who have had much more opportunity to have commit crimes deserving of death during their many years on earth.

If murdering babies is okay with him, why would murdering Christians not be (so long as it does not hinder his re-election?)

You must also consider that he can only do so much in two terms, he might not persuade people to pass any law to execute Christians, not because he is against it, but rather because it would not pass and would hinder his power when people see such motives.
 
Back
Top