I will not go into where I have received all of my training but some is military some is from sailing, living post Katrina and living on a ranch off grid in nevada.
As to firearms: YES AND AS MANY AS YOU CAN AFFORD. My father (CSO GE Capital) once talked to me about how his gold was his primary investment. I reminded him that 45 to 100 grains of lead will buy pounds of gold.
With that in mind. If you are someone who is more into end times (survivalist mentality) I have a few recommendations. The AR-15 platform is durable and practical and common. They have the platform available to shoot 22lr rounds. This makes practice and platform familiarity inexpensive. With a scope that will do nice for a varmit gun and for home defense at range, with a less lethal round. Then for true home defense/ small animal gun go with a 556/223 round AR-15. The round is versatile with different grains and is effective at wounding intruders. (there are reasons to wound as opposed to kill) In addition, this round is common to NATO/UN/US troops if someone ever needed to resupply. A 30-06 is a wonderful hunting round and great at some distance. I would stick with this as an optional intermediate. If you really want to reach out and touch someone, the safety harbor .50cal rifles are pretty tough to beat using a AR lower. Gives options should one of the three have issues.
For home defense: 9mm handgun, take your pick. There are lots of high quality guns. The 9mm is the most common/ inexpensive (for size) round available. An absolute essential is a 12 gauge. These are again multi-use platforms. There is one more not commonly thought of that will allow you to keep a single shot pistol around even if govt takes guns. A SOLAS 25mm flare gun. These have available inserts to fire a 12 gauge round. Plus the extended flares will stop anyone... period. There is no way to extinguish a flare molten metal hurts.
I can add other options, one of my art projects involves double acting ball valves, inert gas and propane. fun stuff.
AS TO THE GREEN ISSUES: We all know that burning wood is carbon footprint neutral. Coal is not. However burning coal at home is better (with a good unit) than having a power plant do it for you. Here is part of the why. In each stage of energy conversion it requires energy to convert it. We burn coal to create heat to convert the heat energy to electricity, to transfer that at high voltage to a substation to reduce the voltage to a transformer to step down voltage again to heat a coil to heat the house. Skip the steps.
If I was in a place that had trees, well I wood use wood for heat. I am in the desert. Right now vent free propane fireplace as I fit with a solar system.
ENERGY:
There are tons of genset options. I have a few. After Katrina I purchased a Honda EU2000s. I recommend having two. My home runs efficiently off of one, burning 1 gal for every 8-12 hours of run time. Run two in parallel to drive a well pump. I had to (code requirements) have a 8kw (8000watts) genset. It burns 1 gallon of propane an hour. I try not to use this at all. I also have a 4kw gas genset in my Motorhome and high amp alternators and inverters in my vehicles. This is what sailing taught redundancy on everything. Backups for your backups. On site I have two 350 gallon propane tanks and 500 gallons of gasoline and 500 gallons of diesel.
SOLAR AND WIND: do your research first. Solar is very effective in the west not as much in the east. (water molecules lessen solar intensity) Wind is spotty unless you live in the tradewinds.
BATTERIES: Golf cart batteries if buying new. period
MORE TO COME>>>>