• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Polygamy Houses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cap
  • Start date Start date
I think the ideal is whatever works to create a peaceful family. Your ideal can change too.

For many years, we have lived under the same roof. We moved when we outgrew our house. Now we are considering a separate home for me and my child. Even if I do move, it's entirely likely that we will live together again.

Our family will continue to be a family.
 
You're duplicating infrastructure and effort for laundry, childcare, and cooking.
Multiple homes on the same property, or at least close work for some. Duplication can be handy when the washing machine breaks down and you can use the one at the other place. Or having another oven when cooking a big dinner. How about canning season. Might be nice to do canning at one kitchen and regular meal prep in the other. Just a few examples.
 
A lot of old farms have multiple houses, that is something to look into when searching.
 
Honestly, it's building pattern rockfox thought of before PM came into our lives. Though he hasn't shared how to adapt it to PM I could see it working very nicely in that manner as well. Above was my musing on how to go about it.. lol
 
So having separate homes like sister wives is not ideal? I am the only person I know who believes in polygny so I have no one to ask even simple questions to.
There is no "ideal" other than what actually works for you and your family, which is your responsibility to figure out. You do you.

That said (just picking on your choice of words), the word "family" literally (etymologically) means "household", so would you rather have two or three separate families or one big family? In personal conversations with other men, I can think of no one who advocated for separate houses on principle. There are families that for various reasons are making it work living in separate houses, but those are their very specific reasons. Again, you do you: Figure out what works best for you and the members of your household(s) and do that.
 
I was thinking about this today and I can see how some personalities would like a multiple house arrangement; it's just very much not me. I have a hard time describing it to myself in anything except unflattering comparisons. But I could see some scenarios where I'd end up in that arrangement. Not my first preference though by a long shot.

But there is nothing morally wrong about multiple households is there? Can it be practically done without dividing the fathers time with children too much? Are there any Biblical precedents?
 
We do not have children at home so we on our own untill we find the sister w .
We are building and have made 2 xtra rooms one my large craft room other guest until SW if that happens.
One very large you could call it huge kitchen that 2 or more could work in at once .
Well this I guess was god plane as we had no idea about sw before we started to build
When kitchen in IV show you all.
 
For us older people with no kids at home, we do "us" how it works best and we are happy with "us". So, as Andrew said, "you do you" and be just as happy. :)

Thanks for that reminder! No kids changes the dynamic of this a lot. Being the father of a bunch of young kids, I forget that perspective.
 
So having separate homes like sister wives is not ideal? I am the only person I know who believes in polygny so I have no one to ask even simple questions to.

I think even the Sister Wives TV show it was a concession, but not what they wanted. They had to move for legal reason and they were too big to fit in one home in Las Vegas. I understand that they are renting in New Mexico and part of the reason they moved, is they really want to all be in one house again, but that they are going to have to build it themselves and it is cheaper in New Mexico.

The Windor family in "Seeking Sister Wives" has the two wives in separate houses, but that is beacuse they are just starting, and one of the threads of that story line is that they are trying to get into one house together as one family.

If you recall, "Big Love", Bill's dream, that he never achieved, was for them all to live on one big house together.

I think most polygamists at least aspire to all live together in one big house even if they do not always achieve it. Especially the man, who goes from house to house as a concession, but would much prefer all of his wives and children to be under one roof so he does not have to split up his time.
 
Last edited:
Do you keep it a secret or tell everyone. For instance, do I tell my church or down play it. And so forth

Discretion is good, and you do not have to rub it in people faces, but you pretty much should count on getting disfellowshipped from your church if you are going to live a polygamous life. You might be able to hide it for a while, but why would you want to go through that? Just be honest and and have a reason for your faith and take it as it comes. The Lord is your portion.
 
Last edited:
They also have homes with 2 master suites or another type called mother in law suite.

I have a house like this. We have a traditional master and then one of the upstairs bedrooms has a private full bath, although I would not say it is as grand as the downstairs master. We have kept the kids out of that room and we use it for the guest bedroom (come visit us!). It does have the largest closet in the house. The closet itself has a very large window in it and could be used as a little sitting room or nursery although we use it for storage now.

When I was looking for a house 5 years ago "mother-in-law suite" was one of the search terms I was looking for.

Also, when my in-laws came to live with us right before thay passed, we gave them the downstairs master so they would not have to use the stairs and we took the upstairs master as our own. That worked out very well and they were quite comfortable at the end.
 
If we want to be strictly Biblically speaking we should be talking about separate tents or one big tent. :)

Yes but practically speaking, a collection of tents is more akin to a house with it's collection of rooms than to separate houses.

The traditional architecture amoung the polygamous Africans wasn't much different. Each wife had her own 1-2 store mud hut. But each was more like a 1 room building and they were all collected together in a small compound with walls. Like a house.

This is reflective of hot climates. In cold climates we have a collection of rooms & bedrooms all under one roof with a common indoor kitchen and living areas (something which in hot climates would as likely as not be outside). If you go back in our European history (not even to Christ, just 600-1500 years), everyone in the household slept in one big room with the fire in it called the great room. Later it developed extra rooms for food storage and preparation and later, the master of the house would take a room for himself; which began the trend of separate bedrooms. But these are a reflection of our wealth and technology, as historically you couldn't heat a bunch of individual rooms. To such people, arguments about one house or two, having separate bedrooms/private spaces or one common would seem absurd.
 
I was thinking about this today and I can see how some personalities would like a multiple house arrangement; it's just very much not me. I have a hard time describing it to myself in anything except unflattering comparisons. But I could see some scenarios where I'd end up in that arrangement. Not my first preference though by a long shot.

But there is nothing morally wrong about multiple households is there? Can it be practically done without dividing the fathers time with children too much? Are there any Biblical precedents?
Correct, nothing morally wrong. What matters here is a bigger principle, so let me throw this out there:

In our experience, one of the primary benefits of plural living, if not THE primary benefit, is the need for transparency, or put the other way, the need to drop all pretense. This is especially true when all are under one roof, and the pressure is attenuated (more or less in different cases, depending on how it's done, but at least somewhat in all cases) when the families/households are separate.

And one of the things you get to drop is any pretense to any kind of religious superiority. We're all just doing the best we can with the situation we're in and the tools and experience we have. It is more important that we learn to love and care for our wives as they are, developing whatever kind of unity and teamwork our leadership skills and their temperaments (and followership skills) permit at the time, than to get hung up with 'ideals' and trying to figure out the 'right' or 'wrong' way to do this.

As a metaphor, we're all just guys who like to hang out at the same gym. What's important is that we're all doing the work, and generally we're all helping each other improve. It's a journey, not a destination. When you're on the 'way' of self-improvement, you're where you need to be. And one guy may be focused on legs while another guy is more concerned about upper body. Or one guy might be training for form or for a body-building contest, another guy is interested in power lifting and brute strength, and the third buddy is an athlete who's more concerned about agility and flexibility than raw power. But what they all have in common is that they're all trying, they're all doing the work, they're all at the gym.

The things that worked for me and my women I'm willing to share with anyone, but they may or may not work for you and your women because of vastly different backgrounds and current context. The most important thing you can do is aspire to get to know God and get to know your woman or women better than you do now, and then stay on that path until you die.

As a general rule, though, the biggest rewards come to those who work the hardest, and generally speaking, the hardest work is living under one roof. It's like living in the gym instead of going to it three or four times a week. But the guys who are living in separate houses are making their families work for them, and that's what matters.

On another note, we lived for a few years in a distributed, 'campus style' setup such as rockfox described above, and it worked reasonably well. It was a retreat center property, with a central living/dining building and separate cabins that we used for bedrooms. Except for the extra distance you had to walk in the rain or the heat or the cold to get to your bedroom, it was pretty much the same vibe as living under one roof. But living under one roof is certainly more economically efficient, and it provides for more spontaneous interactions.
 
To me, separate houses would feel more like parallel monogamy than polygyny.
 
Back
Top