• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Rise of the ‘soft girl’ making waves across Sweden

MeganC

Seasoned Member
Real Person*
Female

Sweden is undergoing a change that may just upset the peace of mind of thousands of feminists across the globe with its new model for women: ‘soft girls’.

The latest trend to catch on in Sweden. Not only does the term suggest the adoption of – let’s say – a more passive role, but is defined as a celebration of women quitting work and living off their husbands or boyfriends.

Interestingly, Sweden’s global reputation for championing gender equality continues to glow. So, this makes things even harder to understand when we consider women like Vilma Larsson aged 25, who embraces a social media trend encouraging her to leave her job and lose her independence, as she falls into total dependency on her male partner. Vilma, who previously worked in grocery stores, a care home and a factory is now lavishing life as a stay-at-home girlfriend and claims she has never been happier than now. In a statement, she said: “My life is softer. I am not struggling. I am not very stressed.”

‘Soft girl’ Vilma’s days are cooking, taking coffee and going to the gym​

And that’s no surprise given her boyfriend works remotely in finance and she splits her days between the gym, going out for coffee, cooking and travelling… with his money! She said: “Every month he gives me a salary from his money that he made. But if I need more, I’ll ask him. Or if I need less, I don’t – I just save the rest.”

Living this relaxed lifestyle, Vilma has gained substantial fame across social media via Instagram, YouTube and TikTok, with 11,000 followers tuning in to see the latest pics and clips of her lifestyle. According to Vilma, she uses the hashtags “hemmaflickvän” and “hemmafru” (Swedish for stay-at-home girlfriend and housewife) and simply defines herself as a “soft girl” which diverts from today’s emphasis on women being career-driven and instead focuses on the more feminine, laid-back and home-making female.

The trend gained popularity and media attention last year when a survey revealed that many 15-24 year olds were embracing the trend. This August, nothing seemed to have changed as 14 per cent of seven to 14-year-olds aspired to be soft girls in the future. One researcher described how the trend originated: “It’s about leaning away from this ‘girl boss’ ideal that we’ve seen for a lot of years, where there are very, very high demands for success in every aspect of life.”

‘Soft girl’: “very dangerous” and “a step backwards” for gender equality​

Discussion around the topic has gained ground – and quickly. Gudrun Schyman – the co-founder and former leader of Sweden’s feminist party, Feministiskt initiativ – has not taken too kindly to the movement and described it as being “very dangerous”, and “a step backwards” for gender equality. Ms Schyman blames the country’s right-wing coalition government and its collaborations elsewhere for injecting this increasingly widespread mentality and also decries the lack of awareness of how much women have had to fight for equal rights.

On the other side of the coin, the Sweden Democrats party backs the trend. Denice Westerberg, national spokesperson for the party’s youth wing said: “I think that people should get to decide over their own life.” She added: “And if you have that economic possibility to do that [live off a partner] then good for you. We still live in a country with all the opportunities to have a career. We still have all the rights, but we have the right to choose to live more traditionally.”
 
Found this in my news feed and liked the idea that a growing number of young women are rejecting the destructive lesbian-feminist prog/woke agenda! These ladies want a real life and not just slaving at a career and the dying alone in a nursing home someday!
 
And because pictures are sometimes required...

1733510169380.png
 
My sw felt a wee bit judged (or rather that she would be by some) for choosing dependancy and commitment to a husband. The world really pushes women to be "strong and independant."
I'm so glad she wanted to be a wife and mom!
It's wonderful that more are turning back to the kind of relationships that build both men and women. The kind that recognise and appreciate the strengths of each.

That's some good news there!
 
My sw felt a wee bit judged (or rather that she would be by some) for choosing dependancy and commitment to a husband. The world really pushes women to be "strong and independant."
I'm so glad she wanted to be a wife and mom!
It's wonderful that more are turning back to the kind of relationships that build both men and women. The kind that recognise and appreciate the strengths of each.

That's some good news there!
May all the women of the world unite and push back against the feminism fallacies! Kudo's to the committed women.
I understood in my early teens how blessed I had been to have a mom at home all my childhood.
 
She's sitting around sipping champagne in an evening dress while getting an allowance from her boyfriend "male partner" (YouTube account states she's his girlfriend), and not working... from what has been presented, I beg to differ.

Edit: Looking at her Instagram, I see that she's in a different, expensive-looking outfit, in every second photo. 20 different outfits in the most recent 22 photos of her, which span the past 41 weeks. Her TikTok is similar but ads in spas, hotel rooms, mimosas, etc in that same time frame. Her YouTube is trips to Rome, Dubai, and telling people how to get over their "trauma" and how to "attract money" and be like her.

Sugar baby.
 
Last edited:
She's sitting around sipping champagne in an evening dress while getting an allowance from her boyfriend "male partner" (YouTube account states she's his girlfriend), and not working... from what has been presented, I beg to differ.

Edit: Looking at her Instagram, I see that she's in a different, expensive-looking outfit, in every second photo. 20 different outfits in the most recent 22 photos of her, which span the past 41 weeks. Her TikTok is similar but ads in spas, hotel rooms, mimosas, etc in that same time frame. Her YouTube is trips to Rome, Dubai, and telling people how to get over their "trauma" and how to "attract money" and be like her.

Sugar baby.
I am not going to defend a social media influencer; not least because I’m not going to spend the time to research this particular on to see if she is defensible.

But the broader point is that it’s not being a “sugar baby” to fulfill a traditional gender role. Obviously I am not completely comfortable with the term “girlfriend” but what I know of the situation is that it’s far more wholesome than many others, especially “childless cat lady”.
 
"Vilma, who previously worked in grocery stores, a care home and a factory is now lavishing life as a stay-at-home girlfriend and claims she has never been happier than now. "

So basically she achieved nothing and is fleeing from a depressing life. I doubt her views would be like this were she a Lawyer, Doctor etc. etc.
 
So basically she achieved nothing and is fleeing from a depressing life. I doubt her views would be like this were she a Lawyer, Doctor etc. etc.
I doubt she'd be as happy, particularly if she had been addled by a "publik edjukashun".

And she'd be more likely to be a drug-addicted 'single mom.'
 
"Vilma, who previously worked in grocery stores, a care home and a factory is now lavishing life as a stay-at-home girlfriend and claims she has never been happier than now. "

So basically she achieved nothing and is fleeing from a depressing life. I doubt her views would be like this were she a Lawyer, Doctor etc. etc.
I’ve known very unhappy doctors and lawyers.
 
I doubt she'd be as happy, particularly if she had been addled by a "publik edjukashun".

And she'd be more likely to be a drug-addicted 'single mom.'

I am not sure one can distinguish between religious and non religious people in this regard.

Not with monasteries etc. being centers for beer, brandy, and wine inventions. To get closer to God, or something like that.

I’ve known very unhappy doctors and lawyers.

Sure but I just find it a bit disingenuous to argue that someone moving from poverty to non-poverty is anything but a monetary consideration.

Money cannot buy happiness but it makes many problems go away.
 
Money cannot buy happiness but it makes many problems go away.
This is a truism that many without money fail to fully understand. Often they cite piety as a reason for poverty. Or, claim that money is the root of all evil. Which by the way is not an accurate quote from the bible..

Suffice it to say, I concur, "Money cannot buy happiness but it makes many problems go away."
 
So basically she achieved nothing and is fleeing from a depressing life. I doubt her views would be like this were she a Lawyer, Doctor etc. etc.
Doubt it.

I don't see as status driven. If she was copying Greta she could finish on national TV.

And now she has ton of free time and can spend it on making her more beautiful (if current man has major malfunction, she will be able to find replacement).

And why to become doctor or lawyer? She would have to work overtime for zero free time.
 
Sure but I just find it a bit disingenuous to argue that someone moving from poverty to non-poverty is anything but a monetary consideration.
Having moved from extreme poverty to financial solvency I can assure that it is rare that “monetary considerations” result in financial gain.

Usually only work, discipline and faithfulness result in financial gain.
 
Having moved from extreme poverty to financial solvency I can assure that it is rare that “monetary considerations” result in financial gain.

Usually only work, discipline and faithfulness result in financial gain.

Maybe I worded that wrong. What I meant that her determination to become a "soft girl" is motivated by the her life being much better now. I doubt that there is any more deeper philosophical reason.
 
Maybe I worded that wrong. What I meant that her determination to become a "soft girl" is motivated by the her life being much better now. I doubt that there is any more deeper philosophical reason.

While the story features this one woman it also speaks to a growing trend where 14% of young women are seeking out this lifestyle instead of going after the feminist ideal of being a bitter, nasty harpie who hates men, has a house full of cats, and whose closest friends are Johnny Walker, Captain Morgan, Tom Collins, and Elijah Craig.
 
While the story features this one woman it also speaks to a growing trend where 14% of young women are seeking out this lifestyle instead of going after the feminist ideal of being a bitter, nasty harpie who hates men, has a house full of cats, and whose closest friends are Johnny Walker, Captain Morgan, Tom Collins, and Elijah Craig.

Both of those are extremes. The majority of woman are neither "soft girls", nor "nasty harpies who hate men."
 
Back
Top