I love your questions, Pebble, and yes, you are making sense.
And for the record, while I am both serious, and yet clearly operating in the realm of opinion on the subject of atheists, I believe I'm staying strictly Biblical with these questions, tho not taking time to quote Scripture's chapter & verse.
pebble said:
I hub nub daily with brother Muslims (yes, I call them my brothers). If I love them as Muslims, then I have to accept them as Muslims, respect their faith. Yet our beliefs are nearly opposite (except for polygyny). Loving them is supporting them and if I support them, is there any incentive for them to get to God's good side?
Let's think about this a bit. Do you have any actual siblings, Pebble? Children? Parents living? Family of any sort in the natural world? If so, do you agree with all of their choices? Courses of action? Beliefs? Do you even
respect all of those?
(Me? I DO have LOTS of both family and friends with whose actions, choices, and beliefs I sometimes disagree and definitely do NOT respect.)
Does your or my agreement or disagreement, respect or disrespect in ANY way alter the relationship? My Mom remains my Mom despite ... and I could go on and on. Right?
So, if our fight is NOT with flesh and blood, and all of humankind is of one blood (there IS scripture for that!), then we're all family. Brothers. Some heading for heaven, others for hell. But all family. Jesus died for the sins of us ALL, whether all receive Him or not.
The difficulty here, Pebble, appears to be a couple of leaps of logic that don't seem to work out too well.
Jesus told us to go into all the world and make disciples, right? (End of Matthew and Mark.) His example is that He came to love and meet us where we were (sinners), but not to
leave us there -- to SAVE us.
So, when it comes to Muslims, we must respect them as humans. Love & care for them as family. Believe that they are sincere seekers after God. Yes. But we do NOT have to respect the path that they are on as valid or leading them towards God. We've been given the express order to introduce them to Jesus and even go beyond that by making them disciples! (That's a bit more extreme than merely "being saved".)
So do I support them? After a fashion. If I'm buying mangoes at the market, am I going to inquire if the vendor is Muslim or Christian? Of course not. And by doing business together, I support them in one way. In another, as we talk together, I support EVERY attempt, or even desire of their heart, to do right, while trying to alter every intent to do wrong.
But that is ACTUAL right. If they confide in me that they are considering doing the right thing and pleasing God by going on jihad and planting a bomb in the local airport, I'm going to support them to do what is right by doing my very best to persuade them that bomb-planting is a WRONG course of action. And if they refuse to listen and head for the airport with their bomb strapped on, I will ever so sorrowfully do my best to introduce them to God well before they get there (shoot 'em, most likely), thus doing the right thing by saving the lives of countless other of my brothers & sisters.
But he will still have been my brother, and God, who isn't willing that ANY should perish, will mourn his loss. So will I. Less than I would, however, the loss of 350 if he had succeeded.
Extreme, I know. But it will hopefully make the point and draw the distinction. Here's another example:
Say that as a Muslim, he believes it to be both his right and his duty to periodically beat his wives? Yet, over lumpia at the local diner, he tells me of the cold hostility in his home, and wishes for a better family life. I can 100% support that! We can discuss how a gentle lashing with rose petals (use your imagination! :lol: ) is likely to be much more effective than a fierce one with a bamboo cane.
Yes, I could go all Scriptural on him and quote the Bible, "Husbands LOVE your wives, even as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for her." But he's probably not ready for that. Yet, if he sees and responds to the drawing power of Love to improve his home life, I have both respected & supported HIM without in the least respecting and supporting the PATH he was on.
And, if God is Love, can we doubt that in some way, he has just responded to God, out of a desire to do right? And thus has made a right and therefore righteous choice?
:shock: :roll:
Cool, huh?
At that other post, atheists in heaven, FollowingHim stated that God destined some for heaven and some for hell.
That is one of those areas where there is disagreement among Christians. (And we respect & support each other despite, sometimes, fierce disagreement.) What *I* see in Scripture is that we were ALL created by God with the intention that we would be part of His kingdom, do good works, come to know Him as He knows us, etc. But that He also knew, since He is not bound by time, which of us would reject the Right and have to be let go into hell. I don't find the idea that Hell needs residents, too, so God/Love created some for bliss & some for torment to even things out. Doesn't sound very loving to me.
Having said that, we have ALL sinned, and thus all DESERVE hell. It is to make a way out for ALL, while knowing that all would not accept it, that Jesus came, and shed His Blood.
Not, however, for demons, etc. And He did it WHILE we were at enmity with God. Our being at enmity and war with Himself, on the wrong side, didn't in the least alter our
relationship - that of being His. So He went to work to change our destiny. Just as our brother might be an enemy, and yet our brother, and thus the instruction, "If thy enemy is hungry, give him bread." Maybe we can turn our enemy/brother into our friend/brother.
Another way to look at it is we were all destined for hell but God doesn't really want that so he gave us a way out. There are people who just seems to harden their heart to God. Or God hardens their their heart to serve His purpose.
Fair nuff. Might I suggest that in that last case, He does so ONLY with people who have made a definite decision as to their SIDE (Heaven's or Hell's), so harder or softer makes no difference to their destiny, but only to the working out of His plans in the lives of others?
So the people who hardens their heart or have their hearts hardened, are they our brothers? And this is not only about Muslims, there are also groups who call themselves Christians that are like these.
Yes, in the sense discussed above. No, in the sense that they may not be traveling a path towards God. This has more to do with whether they are suitable companions for "yoking" than whether they are family. If I have a brother who engages in shady business practices, I won't start a business with him, right? Family or not. It would create a divided house. Unequal yoking. For the same reason, I would not create a business with a Muslim partner, tho I might DO business with one, depending on the level of business. Wouldn't MARRY one -- we're very specifically instructed not to enter into unequal yokings in marriage.
And yes, that would even apply to some Christians. Even within the same denomination! :shock: In my own family, I believe that we must let the Bible change OUR beliefs and actions. Most of my family seem to hold to a belief that I truly do not understand: That it is ok to hold onto their existing belief despite seeing that it is contrary to the teachings of Scripture. It is very specifically why my first wife left me. Guess we were unevenly yoked!
And then there's also this article which I came across...
http://www.be-ready.org/strangers.html
Basically, it says there that, as humans, we have finite resources and we should focus our efforts on our brothers, Christians.
Although I know Jesus went to the sinners 'cause He doesn't need to save the saved already.
Anyone can post a
logical sounding article. But you seem to have seen the fault in the logic right off. Jesus is our example. His example is that of LEAVING the 99 in the fold to go search for the 1 that was lost!
what if demons and other powers of darkness exists in or controls the heart of a man? Is he still our brother?
He is. The demon isn't. Jesus did nothing to accept or support the demon. He simply ordered it out in situations where the host human wanted freedom, and then supported, healed, & helped the human. If the host human did NOT want freedom, He identified their spirit, and called them out over it. Lovingly. Sometimes with tears, sometimes with anger & a whip! Maybe tears then, too! (Opinion. I wasn't there, despite my long white beard! :lol: ) If the host human was unaware and/or undecided, He fed them (bread & fish), and taught. Seems like that is our example.
Hope this helps.