Latest activity

My understanding is that Congress authorizing the security upgrades does in fact authorize the structure.

For real on this one! This protects not only our president but visiting dignitaries and all those associated with running our government. As much as we like to hate on the government, it is far better than anarchy!!

This congressman is claiming he’s heard there’s not just alien life form but machinery as well? Stuff as large as a football field? Hmmm? Exaggerated yarns? Legit findings?

I’m a little confused. Is this an end around to approve and budget the building so as to get the project moving and out of the courts, while still allowing the private funds to remain as the primary funding mechanism, or is this footing the bill...

UAP

Someone else engaged with a comment I posted a long time ago. I was responding to him and you jumped in the middle of it.

I have no problem with the country paying for the upgrades to a building that they are giving us. It saves millions in the rental of the tents that they have been holding events in. Which had zero ballistic protection.

I wouldn’t say that Numbers is talking about the same concept. It’s not speaking about a required covering, nor does it specify what the covering is, nor does it specify that it isn’t speaking of the woman’s hair. The passage has little if any...

Hardly anyone was salivating. Most were urging caution and discussing whether or not there was a need for concern.

A lot more of the discussion took place on the Real People thread. Start about here and you can fill in some details: https://biblicalfamilies.org/forum/threads/real-people.15101/page-11

I know... but I found that photo of you in a public photo library, so... . :)

Here is a pict of my my pet Megalodon..... :)

I wouldn’t say that Numbers is talking about the same concept. It’s not speaking about a required covering, nor does it specify what the covering is, nor does it specify that it isn’t speaking of the woman’s hair. The passage has little if any...

What other particular head covering is mentioned in this passage? Long hair, not just “hair”, is the only covering material mentioned in this passage, which explains why a different greek word is used there. The other words are referring to the...