Broadly. I guess there are certain people whos assessment I need to take seriously like teachers.
Interesting that you mentioned Cathedral since religious people can be somewhat problematic here.
There are lots of people with credentials over and above teachers who have been questioning the vaccine
Re the cathedral...you should note a couple of points.
First I intentionally say "the cathedral" and do not capitalize. I am not referring to a building or anything to do with religion but instead a broad term for a power structure made up of government, industry, media and various non government organizations.
Second is that I am the lone herstic here in that I am not religious.
I come to my position on plural marriage from my own personal conclusion that polygamy is a good way to build a large and endearing family. One where children have more parents in a world where so many have less than in previous times. One where there are more heads and hands to turn towards dealing with problems. One where there is more companionship and frankly I simply see it as quite natural.
My own morals and notions are parallel to the group with occasional intersections and crossovers but very much my own, informed by my own ideas and my own codes and ideals.
So I don't see that the concept of Cathedrals and religion being problematic applies to me.
I am likely to be problematic in your eyes for different reasons.
All that said, the unfortunate thing about the majority of secular people who use the term poly is that they are rebranded swingers looking for hedonistic pursuits and to stoke their own overt narcissism. This is why I avoid the truncated term and prefer plural marriage to poly.
I am not what you could remotely call fond of that set. Unfortunately they seem to be vastly more common than those who are family focused regardless of their faith or lack thereof.
We've all discussed this in the past and have just stopped debating it.
