Awe shucks, ma’am, you just made my day![]()
Full disclosure is I like an intelligent smartass.
Awe shucks, ma’am, you just made my day![]()
I definitely have the smartass part down….Full disclosure is I like an intelligent smartass.![]()
Hey, if there is a school, I could definitely use some refinementCan I sign up for the 100 level class "Smartassery Basics"?
Genesis 2:24: Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.Co-creation and bearing the child is a beautiful thing but I press the issue of the "sacredness" of marriage as a religious construct. I don't find that a man and woman is any more righteous as "married" versus a jon and his prostitute. BOTH of them can become "one" in act or in creation of new life.
I do however think that when the two come together, it can be wonderful occasion provided all the elements as far as we understand (the state, contracts, permissions, paperwork etc. Or not!) are honored. The feeling of permanence is an important part for most women's security and "ownership" or "stewardship" or "patriarchy" for a man.
This is a fact. My sisterwife's family would have been fine with her sleeping with her boss....especially if she got compensation for it, but calling it marriage made it oppression in their eyes and a "big mistake" they thought she would later regret. After seeing our grown sons work ethic, manners, and commitment to helping others as volunteer fire fighters, there has been a change of heart. Of course seeing them treat their very young half siblings with love and respect helps too. The fact that we still have friends that support us...and treat us normal doesnt hurt. Its probably even better that those friends are not religious as in not "programed" to believe this way.Ah, but if this other woman calls herself the man's mistress then society says, "Okay."
They do not object to the sexual relationship, they object to the commitment.
A secular contract involving the state looks fairly unholy to me. The same state that says two men can marry, and that babies can be murdered in the womb? The same state that restricts prayer in schools? I don't want anything to do with that! The state as a third party to my marriage is as gross to me as including a satanist as a sisterwife. I'll pass. On the other hand, like minded people with a desire to raise children in the fear and admonition of YHWH coning together in "holy matrimony" (set apart mother making) is just a larger holy alliance. It is the same substance, the same goal, in the same family structure. It just provokes those who believe God's athority goes God, parents, children. It brings home the natural order that gives men authority in their homes....it also adds another in that very important place in the home. Job share sounds cold. Another warm feminine presence is so much more!I would posit that the idea of the sacredness of marriage has to do with the differentiation between civil unions and the “oneness” of a covenant between two people and the Almighty.
A marriage is pretty much the most important agreement that we make in life, outside of our salvation.
It’s not exactly a religious observance, but it’s closer than anything else that exists.
The same state that says two men can marry, and that babies can be murdered in the womb? The same state that restricts prayer in schools? I don't want anything to do with that! The state as a third party to my marriage is as gross to me as including a satanist as a sisterwife. I'll pass.
So true.Another warm feminine presence is so much more!
I saw a fb comment where a guy said "At least then the wife has someone to help her, they both know the husband won't" but why should a man have to do his job, then come home and help her do hers? Women have different perception and abilities that make them far better equipped to manage the varied details of a household.
If women could just get over seeing the "other women" as a threat....they could appreciate the help AND companionship.