• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Avoid pork!

OK - so have you ever actually read RFK, Jr's, The Real Anthony Fauci?" Or Dr. Pierre Kory's The War on Ivermectin?

"Actual science" was not just censored, but essentially banned, during the Biden Regime. And I speak for those whom they tried to kill in the process, first-hand.

Real science includes peer review and open exchange of evidence, not censorship.
 
That would mean that everyone Trump pardoned is guilty of something as well...
If you cannot see the difference between pardoning people who have been sentenced and pardoning people in case they might be accused, I can’t help you.
 
That would mean that everyone Trump pardoned is guilty of something as well...
You misunderstand the difference between a pardon AFTER someone has been arrested, tried etc, which is normal, and what Biden did which was attempt to pardon people who have not been arrested for anything.

In the case of the vast majority of people that any president has pardoned - including Biden by the way - they have already been arrested by the police and convicted of a crime. The president then decided their punishment did not fit the crime, and chose to release them. This is legitimate - the president is functioning as the final judge, and can grant clemency just as a king can in a monarchy. In general, the J6 protestors are guilty of something, officially, according to the courts - and the president has given them clemency. Same for the people on death row that Biden switched to life imprisonment. Agree or disagree with the decision itself, it is a legally legitimate decision.

In contrast, Biden "pardoned" people who had never been arrested for a crime. That is very suspicious, and suggests they should be arrested for something, because pardons go hand-in-hand with being arrested for something.
 
Last edited:
In contrast, Biden "pardoned" people who had never been arrested for a crime.
If you cannot see the difference between pardoning people who have been sentenced and pardoning people in case they might be accused, I can’t help you.
He was pardoning people that he knew the right would go after. It was very smart; you won't catch me saying that too often about Biden.
 
And thereby made everyone even more suspicious of them, opening them up to state prosecution (which the pardon does not protect them from), civil prosecution for damages (which the pardon also does not protect them from), and federal prosecution anyway if his right to give pre-emptive pardons is challenged in the Supreme Court (which is inevitable as who wants Trump to have the power to pre-emptively pardon anyone he likes also?). He's handed them a poison pill which will destroy them, not protect them. Not smart.
 
He was pardoning people that he knew the right would go after. It was very smart; you won't catch me saying that too often about Biden.
It was merely an act of desperation, and as Samuel has indicated, it may not have been smart at all.
 
In the case of Fauci, and Marxist Milley, who committed treason, it was a lead pipe cinch that they SHOULD, if we retain even a pretense of a Rule of Law, be tried and convicted. As for the J6 traitors, who knowingly lied to the people, and destroyed evidence of the criminal wrongdoing that needs to be exposed, they are observably guilty of subborning perjury and criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, among other crimes.

PS> Biden is too senile to be tried for treason, say those who covered for him (and his Deep State Puppet Masters) all along. But it was still just pure, obvious CYA.
 
He was pardoning people that he knew the right would go after. It was very smart; you won't catch me saying that too often about Biden.
Yea. Except now Trump can order airstrike on him and give himself pardon to avoid facing court or police.

This is biggest danger. Whole idea behind
pardon is corrective mechanism when court system malfunction.

Now it's in danger on being turned into do limitless crime and avoid justice. This is insane.
 
@steve @FollowingHim

That's certainly a possibility. I just disagree with the statement that the pardon further proves Mark's point.
It doesn't prove it, but it does raise the likelihood of there being something here that needs investigation. It's just one more piece of evidence pointing in that direction. Which is why these people will now come under more scrutiny, not less, to figure out what really is going on.
 
Says who? When it happens, let me know. I'd certainly be curious. But once again I can go right back to Trump, who was "technically" convicted of nonsense due to a witch hunt..
The difference is that you can see the evidence, the law, and the testimony: Of which there was literally ZERO in the various circus show trials of Trump. (In NY, they didn't even care about the Statute of Limitations, and tried to selectively prosecute an expired misdemeanor, at best, as a felony.)

Fauci, without question, pursued prohibited 'gain of function' bioweapon development, and, also without question, lied under oath to Congress (Rand Paul, it was perjury.) But the real crimes are well-documented, and RFK's book is a tremendous tour-de-force summary.
 
Can you link your sources? I'd like to look into it.
Other than the book, I don't have time to read a book at the moment.
The difference is that you can see the evidence, the law, and the testimony: Of which there was literally ZERO in the various circus show trials of Trump
I almost agree with this and that was part of my initial point. Why would I believe a conviction against Fauci without seeing proof after what happened with Trump. A conviction alone means nothing these days.
 
Back
Top