Kudos to you,
@Daniel DeLuca, for taking the bull by the horn to create a dating site that fits in with your vision of what kind of matches would be acceptable in your eyes.
I happen to personally agree with
@FollowingHim in regard to your choice to exclude divorced women, but it is your site, and therefore it is your freedom to choose who you want your patrons to be.
I'm also thankful for and impressed by
@FollowingHim's level of detail in regard to the coding advice he's been giving you. I concur with him about the efficacy of purchasing preconfigured dating-site software that you can adjust to your specifics. You have better things to do with your time, and I suspect that, if you put the word out that you need some funding for it after you determine its price, brothers who share your vision of what the clientele for the site should be will be more than willing to toss you some investment money. I know I would be.
I won't be signing up, but only because I am unwilling to restrict myself from marrying women who have been divorced. At the same time, I do sincerely support your choice to tackle the difficulties of managing that can of worms, as
@FollowingHim referred to it, because you are always consistent in your position that divorced women are off-limits to those whom you believe are following the proper dictates of Scripture.