Very interesting answers, especially the ones who are able to peer into the depths of my heart and mind,
(very amusing to read) foolishly assuming they know my intention, when they have completely ignored the fact that I already explained it on here.
@Bartato is the only one I can see who has directly read and answered the full question
Thank you
@Bartato I may not agree with your standpoint but kudos to you for not twisting the question into something it was not and exercising a seemingly ever decreasing skill of answering a straight question with a straight answer.
I don't know the origin of this doctrine, maybe you could enlighten me, I first heard it from a Roman catholic priest.
Contrary to the false accusers I did not mention or allude to Torah in anyway I clearly stated,
the gospels.
Amongst some saccharine saturated platitudes alluding to an amorphous standard of what it is to be identified as a disciple or Christian, there was some honey.
@Mark C stated
I will focus on the ".......
work out....." because contrary to popular opinion (with regards to how I have heard it taught preached and used) it doesn't actually mean, work out to figure out, it should more actually be translated work to completion or work to finish based on what the believers had been taught
In context...
Wherefore, my beloved, as
ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out (to completion) your own salvation with fear and trembling. — Philippians 2:12 KJV
Which points to the fact of listen attentively; to heed or
conform to a command or authority:—hearken, be obedient to, obey.
There is quite obviously a standard of living that Paul and the other apostles were teaching that caused division, that was exclusive and exclusionary, that caused those who heard to state emphatically that
THEY (the apostles)
TEACH CUSTOMS that they being Roman's could not keep.
(Very apropos in this day and age considering the current systems we all live under, especially regarding biblical marriage)
Now, that was divisive and apparently, by most standards nowadays not very "christ like"
Consequently we receive warnings like these AFTER he arose from the dead that were recorded for our benefit
He that names the name of Christ
depart from iniquity
Also....
Follow peace with all and
holiness without which no man will see the Lord
What about...
Examine yourselves, whether you be
IN THE FAITH; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except you be reprobate/rejected?
These are quite divisive exclusive statements and instructions....
Oooohhh and this quite clear exhortation...
Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common salvation, I was compelled to write to you [urgently] appealing that you
fight strenuously for [the defense of] the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints [the faith that is the sum of Christian belief that was given verbally to believers]. — Jude 1:3 AMP
I could go on to list out the times that the apostles, the writers of what we call the new testament, quoted or referred to the words of Christ BEFORE he resurrected and ascended, instead I will go to his own words, to the very apostles his disciples through whose words we all come to faith through.
And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying,
All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen. — Matthew 28:18-20 KJV
Take note
"....I have commanded...." is NOT in future tense here
This statement this command is compounded by the very words of YAHushuWaH/Jesus BEFORE his death burial and resurrection
I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. Now they have known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received [them], and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me. — John 17:6-8 KJV
I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them through THY TRUTH: THY WORD IS TRUTH. As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth. Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; THAT THEY ALL MAY BE ONE; as thou, Father, [art] in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. — John 17:14-21 KJV
Make of his words what you will, but as for me and my house...........
(And look at that not one Torah quote used lol)
PS.
To the admins...
reiterating once again that according to my original question and post this was actually based on the gospels and the teachings within the new testament. Taking into account that I am relatively new on here compared to the majority actively conversing across the platform, I do find it odd that there is such a push restricting Torah based doctrinal understanding which does not seem to be present on the other side of the fence which seems tolerant of just about any form of doctrine as long as it is NOT Torah based in any way. Is there a reason why this (to me) seemingly unbalanced directive is not made just as restrictive on the non Torah side?