• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

In what way does God join man and woman together?

Just type in club and sex trafficking:

Just type "car accident". If incident rate was 1% per person per one "going out" people would stop going out due to being too dangerous.

It happens as car accidents happens, but it's too rare, so most leople feel safe (and are being safe), so it not a problem. It's tragic situation for victims, not regular occurence.

You are here making elephant from fly.
Monogamy only = women without a covering = violence and wickedness perpetuated by a system that on the surface is "feminism + pro women rights." It's a lie.
What do means by women without covering? If it means without father's protection, then marriage system doesn't matter. If you mean monogamy only when without covering is minority of women.

So how can exactly minority cause whole society problem? How can they exactly cause disturbance for rest? Thiefs are perfect example, but why are unmarried girls is similar situation?

The best thing for a woman is to be under a covering - Jacob had 12 sons through his 12 wives - and that gave his entire household dominion and power through the blessing of the Most High.
It's 4 wives, not 12. Please don't make such basic mistake.

Especially if they are working in unison - functioning similar to the body of Christ. That's a force to be reckoned with - praise Yeshua's Righteous and Holy Law that protects women and children. Men made laws seem good on the outside - but inside they're full of wickedness. The monogamy only law is a prime example.
Check natural law tradition. I'm willing to bet that whole Yeshua law can be correctly reasoned starting with axiom:

Good bring life and evil death.

Did test run with sexual laws. Was able to get then most.

2 Corinthians 11:14
And no wonder! Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

The way Monogamy only was indoctrinated was through "equality and love." So even satan's laws can be disguised as angels of light. I'm not saying monogamy is bad - but monogamy "only" is wickedness. There are more women then men + some men have an ability to love and take care of more than one women - it denies those men from being able to cover more than one woman (at least legally - they would have to be more wise and quiet because even "Christians" would turn on them).
"Equality and love" is recent invention. At most one/two centuries old (does French Revolution count?). And monogamy only in Europe is from 11th century. So it can't be "equality and love".

That's just new excuse for old tradition.
 
It would be far simpler to say that marriage is a type of purchase and sale agreement, sex is sex, and the "one flesh" is the resultant fertilization of egg by sperm called a baby. Ideally, it all happens relatively close to each other, so much so that it appears to be indistinguishable from other aspects. Here is why I parse this out- each can be done separately. Marriage can occur without sex(sadly). Sex can occur without marriage(not a good plan, read into that the pregnant prostitute), and One Flesh can occur without either with IVF or IUI(with sperm donor and/or a surrogate) and no physical touching other than the obvious exchange of bodily fluids(very impersonal[clinical] and removed from emotional involvement). The spiritualizing of the practice or calling it "Holy" gives a nod to ancient Greek philosophy where persons have a "soul-tie" or even to the idolatry of the Catholic church which made up their own criteria as regarding what is indeed Holy. Marriage is indeed honorable and is the best practice for a society(so says the Bible).
 
“If a man seduces a virgin who is not engaged to anyone and has sex with her, he must pay the customary bride price and marry her. 17 But if her father refuses to let him marry her, the man must still pay him an amount equal to the bride price of a virgin.
It seems like a dowry runs counter to that.
 
It seems like a dowry runs counter to that.
Dowry goes back to Roman times. I don’t think the girl’s family should be obligated to pay for anything, but it’s the bridegroom that takes care of it.

Many “Roman Ways” go in direct contradiction to the “Creator’s Ways.” I will choose the righteous path of the Creator over man’s ways any day of the week:

Jeremiah 6:16
English Standard Version
Thus says the LORD (YHVH): “Stand by the roads, and look, and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is; and walk in it, and find rest for your souls. But they said, ‘We will not walk in it.’
 
Back
Top