I feel a kind of kinship to Lazarus now.
HE'S BAAAAACK!
And I assume you mean that you want an example of when "Satan" fell morally, not position-ally, right?
(Which, btw, I could not provide)
I feel a kind of kinship to Lazarus now.
But doesn't this indicate that Satan fell morally? Otherwise what is evil doing in the presence of God in heaven. This shows he was in the presence of God then fell morally and was cast out of the presence of God. Does it not?HE'S BAAAAACK!
And I assume you mean that you want an example of when "Satan" fell morally, not position-ally, right?
(Which, btw, I could not provide)
Terms like "Fell morally" or "evil" need to be defined, but more importantly who or what they are being applied to also needs to be clearly understood. There was a reference to Lucifer in the other thread. The context and Strongs concordance agree that Lucifer is not a fallen angel.But doesn't this indicate that Satan fell morally? Otherwise what is evil doing in the presence of God in heaven. This shows he was in the presence of God then fell morally and was cast out of the presence of God. Does it not?
You make a good point @Joleneakamama we should be careful that were are not talking past each other.Terms like "Fell morally" or "evil" need to be defined, but more importantly who or what they are being applied to also needs to be clearly understood. There was a reference to Lucifer in the other thread. The context and Strongs concordance agree that Lucifer is not a fallen angel.
Studying satan is interesting, and can really change the way one views the world and world events.
Examining critically the mormon doctrine I was raised with certainly made me ask the same kind of difficult questions about other denominations, and see similarities in familiar doctrines that may go unnoticed to members.
Context is key to understanding. How a word is used through scripture is what determines its true meaning. Popular use changing the understanding of words is as dangerous as rewriting the Scriptures, and is a sad historical fact.
Just look for example at the Hebrew word 'Goy ' Scripturally it denotes a large group of people like a nation, and was used to describe God's Holy nation of Israel but the biased modern use has given it an unbiblical negative conotation. To a modern Jew it is a dirty word and not one they would appreciate being used of them.
Jesus called Peter satan, but what did Jesus mean by that.....and what did it mean to Peter?
@Slumberfreeze when you say, "fell morally" what do you mean by that?HE'S BAAAAACK!
And I assume you mean that you want an example of when "Satan" fell morally, not position-ally, right?
(Which, btw, I could not provide)
But doesn't this indicate that Satan fell morally? Otherwise what is evil doing in the presence of God in heaven. This shows he was in the presence of God then fell morally and was cast out of the presence of God. Does it not?
@Slumberfreeze when you say, "fell morally" what do you mean by that?
I have always tied the Angels that kept not their first estate to the Angels in Enoch and Genesis 6 that went in to the daughters of men. They left Heaven willingly and are locked up right now. Satan was cast out of Heaven but he and his Angels are still allowed to operate and are not bound yet.Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
I don’t have my study journal with me now, but there are several Old Testament references to lightning from the sky etc
Because sin didn't originate on earth but instead in heaven with Lucifer.
when Jesus died on the cross he had to ascend and place his blood on the mercy seat in Heaven. Because sin didn't originate on earth but instead in heaven with Lucifer.
Maybe I should have been more specific. The word satan appears many times in scripture but in context just means adversary. You find figurative speech like this used throughout the old testament.Luke 10:18
And he said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven."
How can an earthly king be a cherub when a cherub is an angelic being? That reminds me of something i heard from Perry Stone that is pretty neat. Satan is a cherub which is not a normal angel. Cherubs have 4 faces and you can see Satan described as each of those 4 faces through scripture.Maybe I should have been more specific. The word satan appears many times in scripture but in context just means adversary. You find figurative speech like this used throughout the old testament.
The verses that tell of Lucifer "falling from heaven" or the anointed cherub in which iniquity was found who was said to have been in "Eden the garden of God" are telling of earthly kings being judged and losing their high position that God gave them. God brought them very low. In Revelation Michael and his angels fight against the dragon who is called the devil and satan. These are end time prophesies about the judgment of this thing called mystery babylon that has been warring against the people of God.
When Jesus started teaching the truth there were many afraid of losing their positions. The religious authorities in Judea tried to shut him up because they were afraid the Romans would "Take away our place and our nation." There were many false gods being worshiped in that day, and those selling merchandise relating to false religions wanted to protect their livelihoods. So when His taught ones went out teaching the good news and casting out evil spirits (evil motivations) hearts were changed.
Both Jesus and John the Baptist called "Certain of the Pharisees" vipers, or children of their father the devil. I believe this is all figurative speech and Jesus' comment "I beheld satan as lightning fall from heaven" was about the political and maybe religious figures of that day losing their position because The Kingdom was at hand and liberty was being preached.
History shows they did indeed fall from their positions of power.
haha I thought you were a hebraic guyDooooood!!!! @Soldier's Psalm layin the Truth down thick bruh ... bustin out some Hebrew and such ...I like this guy. We can be GOOD friends!
#GodofGood
#GodofOrder
Same in Gad.Well, like @AmericanIsraelite, I hold that John's vision is of a future event. (Which is in the first verse of Revelation). If that is so, then Satan certainly has not yet been cast out by Michael. I add to that the fact that Satan (in Job) was travelling the earth and was called to assemble before God in heaven with the rest of the sons of God. Access to what we refer to as heaven is not yet denied him. After all, he does accuse us night and day...
Same in Gad.
YesGad... the prophet?
Brilliant.IMO the biggest issue that Calvinism completely misses is that we are all predestined to hell, not heaven.
He was just an earthly king who was also a Cherub and was in Eden and also walked in the fires of creation? Maybe its just me but that seems like one heck of a stretch. I mean isn't it simpler to believe its Lucifer the fallen cherub who is named earlier and has the same imagery used to describe him in multiple books. I think maybe you are getting hung up that Satan means adversary but that is how all Hebrew names work. Like the name Asher means blessed and it is the word for blessed that you would use to describe someone or something. The name given to Satan is the word adversary which describes his character but is also his name.Well @Soldier's Psalm, when I read Ezekiel 28 I see nothing but prophetic figurative speech foretelling the destruction of a king along with the city he ruled over.
It does tend to make my head hurt to try and make these verses about anything else. He was a Satan (adversary) for sure, but clearly a human king.