The difference is that they accept it as a sign to answer the question "Is the book of mormon true?" This is trying to get a single answer to a huge conglomeration of doctrines and ideas, and accepting as conclusive a "proof test" that is not biblical. This is often a jumping off point to accepting that Joseph Smith was a true prophet (in spite of failing the prophet test of Deut.) Because they say to judge him (J.S.) by his fruit (the book of mormon) and then finally accepting the mormon church and priesthood as true too. I love my family that are LDS, but I see that the men (even my dad and uncles) lack the authority of a true patriarch. I believe this is because they accept the incorrect teachings and the authority of the church leaders. They also seem to be disconnected in a way from a true scriptural foundation or understanding. My mom and uncle both believe all prophesy is conditional, and people repenting could effect a different outcome.That opinion is quite acceptable here.
Do you think that "burning in the bosom" is much different from the "I have peace in my heart" approach others claim to have when it comes to knowing or obeying the truth?
I really don't like the fruit, and am of the opinion that any good in the mormon church or people is the result of their sincerity and the law being written on hearts.
In contrast, what you suggest is allowing the holy spirit to lead and convict you in the action of walking out your faith, very different from using a feeling to answer an abstract loaded and faulty question.
The scripture and reason are far better in determining truth.
My hubby would joke that "burning in the bosom" is indigestion, and it means you probably need to change your diet. Perhaps there is more truth to that then a simple literal reading would convey! Lol