• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

MALE vs FEMALE PROCREATIVE NATURE

This.... ALLLLLL This. I see things playing out a bit more bleak but... It's what I've been telling my friends and family for the past decade, and preparing for this flavor of a thing to play out. I don't think it's a 100% certainty.. But I'm betting everything I have on the eventuality that something akin to it will be seen in my lifetime. I just pray I have 5-7 years left to prepare.

I see two major things to prepare for:

1. The collapse of the cities and the outflow of refugees and criminals behind them. Prepare to fight off urban police who will try to use their badges and costumes to intimidate you into giving them what's yours. You may end up deputized by your own local law enforcement to fight off these people. Read this book for a study on police behavior in the absence of supervision:


2. In the aftermath of the collapse of the cities there will be a 30-60 day period of uncertainty. This is what you have to get through until some sort of order is created. I won't say that order will be reestablished because we don't have such a thing to reestablish.

Something new will come about and if it is run by men who are not Christians then it will be bad. Not sure what to do at that point but for now I hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
 
This.... ALLLLLL This. I see things playing out a bit more bleak but... It's what I've been telling my friends and family for the past decade, and preparing for this flavor of a thing to play out. I don't think it's a 100% certainty.. But I'm betting everything I have on the eventuality that something akin to it will be seen in my lifetime. I just pray I have 5-7 years left to prepare.
You don't have that much time; in the absence of several miracles, the shit hitting the fan is coming much sooner than 2030 (personally, I'm hoping I have 5-7 months -- because those who are purposefully orchestrating events to destroy our cultures in order to be able to "build back better" in their own images will utilize SHTF events as part of the lead-up to completing the goals they have for 2030. Furthermore, much of that may get moved up to occur before our 2024 federal elections. We probably should be preparing for everything from EMPs, power grid collapse, unnecessary manufactured water shortages, purposeful poisoning, DEWs, economic collapse, elimination of paper money and institution of a credit-score-associated central bank digital currency, wholesale property confiscation, and even nuclear holocaust and/or attempts to grab all our firearms and ammunition.
I see two major things to prepare for:

1. The collapse of the cities and the outflow of refugees and criminals behind them. Prepare to fight off urban police who will try to use their badges and costumes to intimidate you into giving them what's yours. You may end up deputized by your own local law enforcement to fight off these people. Read this book for a study on police behavior in the absence of supervision:

https://www.amazon.com/Five-Days-Me...s=five+days+at+memorial&qid=1695167387&sr=8-1
2. In the aftermath of the collapse of the cities there will be a 30-60 day period of uncertainty. This is what you have to get through until some sort of order is created. I won't say that order will be reestablished because we don't have such a thing to reestablish.
Stipulated. I've read several disaster-aftermath-survival books written by people who've witnessed full collapses around the world, and they all agreed that the paramount survival skill is having the ability to be on the move in a way that doesn't come into conflict with either groups of marauders or cobbled-together 'law enforcement.' Being armed is essential . . . but by itself only a temporary strategy if one is wedded to guarding one's castle.
I propose that unexpected events can occur and sometimes we should be giving the world a nudge in the direction we want it to go instead of just passively kvetching about how things are so bad.
Stipulated.
Weimar Germany is a useful parable here. The current West very much resembles the degeneracy of Weimar Germany from the absurd levels of inflation to the abhorrent levels of drug use, corruption, and sexual perversion. Weimar Germany in 1929 bore a stark resemblance to the USA of 2023.

And in Weimar they had an unexpected event in reaction to the degeneracy wrought by the lesbian feminists and their Marxist fellow travelers:

Oh, and I am not saying I expect something as bad as the Nazi regime to rise up in the West.

Nope, I expect something much worse.
Stipulated.
And I estimate that when the backlash comes there will either be a collapse of civilization or a drastic reorganization of it with an implementation of much more traditional values and practices.
Stipulated. Some countries -- like Russia -- are proactively doing this rather than follow our example or that of 20th century Germany.
I can anticipate the probability that people who like to use their own pronouns are going to be among the first to be purged. The loudest voices being always the first to perish in any revolution.
[Rome: The eunuchs were exterminated, the effeminate homosexuals were exterminated, the artists were exterminated, the musicians were exterminated.]
Stipulated. Useful idiots are always the first to be suppressed or exterminated once tyranny gets into full gear. Prior to WWII, the bureaucratic National Socialist state was predominantly populated by Jews (just as was the aristocracy of pre-Soviet Russia), and Berlin was the international centerpiece of flaming radical homosexuality. Who went to the camps?: Jews, gays and Gypsies. And the Jews were liberated before the gays or the Gypsies.
Now of course there's all sorts of hindsight analysis that says this or that about why Rome fell and the hubris and arrogance of it all is the inherent assumption that we won't make the same mistakes they did all while we're busy making the exact same mistakes they did.
To the extent that this is true -- stipulated -- but if you're lumping me in with those who think America isn't headed for the shitter, you're sorely mistaken. I pray that my suspicions are incorrect or at least that something better emerges in the aftermath of SHTF but am unwilling to have a Pollyanna attitude about it. However, what's going on is more Ruling Class Redux than Roman Redux. Many mistakes are being repeated, but from what I see the Bigger Problem isn't that mistakes are being repeated; it's that behaviors and outcomes labeled as 'mistakes' are, in actuality, very purposeful efforts on the part of the ruling class to destroy what has been in order to very purposefully replace it. Elements of this were already present throughout Greek and Roman ascendancy, and to the extent that that was true it also couldn't legitimately be characterized as mistakes.
I read these things and to me this is not dry history. Nor is the Bible dry history to me.
Stipulated and wholeheartedly in agreement.
Can our societies fall? Yes they can. And they can do so suddenly.
Stipulated.
Abortion was considered settled law by the baby-killing vermin on the left and then it suddenly wasn't settled anymore. Praise Jesus!
Not stipulated. I've been an adult since before Roe v Wade, and it has never been settled law -- and may never be settled law, because of Roe v Wade. Abortion, which I consider abhorrent, is actually settled law in numerous Western countries where advocates just worked for legislative victories. In the U.S., they basically packed the Supreme Court and then hoodwinked America into temporarily accepting it by inventing non-existent Constitutional principles, which explains most of why the country has been embroiled about it ever since. And maybe that's a good thing, the fact that they poisoned the well, because it caused people to not just roll over about it they way they have so many other things, like assisted suicide and the Poison Death Shots.
Likewise, birth control can be undone too. Hopefully it will happen peacefully but more likely is there will be a river of blood before that happens. Hopefully a lot of things can happen peacefully but history tells us that meaningful events are rarely accomplished in peace.
Stipulated all, but I fail to see how what you've written here jibes with your assertion in the very next paragraph:
In any case, my body of evidence that things like birth control can suddenly be taken out of the equation comes from a good decade of reading, comprehending what I read, and applying what I have learned.
I join you in hoping that we could be witnesses to a peaceful and sudden removal of birth control from the equation, but even you acknowledge that it would most likely take "a river of blood" before that would happen. Therefore, I can only assume that you haven't discovered any evidence that "birth control [will be suddenly] taken out of the equation and instead are hinting that other 'things like birth control' could suddenly and unexpectedly be taken out of the equation. Given that you don't point to such evidence that birth control will be suddenly and unexpectedly taken out, what other things do you consider potential candidates to fit that 'suddenly and unexpectedly' bill? What you're describing are necessarily concomitant elements of surprise -- I mean, besides the list I provided above (EMPs, power grid collapse, unnecessary manufactured water shortages, purposeful poisoning, DEWs, economic collapse, elimination of paper money and institution of a credit-score-associated central bank digital currency, wholesale property confiscation, and even nuclear holocaust and/or attempts to grab all our firearms and ammunition), what other events should we also be prepared for that would additionally feature sudden and unexpected surprise (because nothing in that list can now qualify as either unexpected or sudden)?
In reading The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
Certainly a classic work containing much great scholarship and some tremendous insights. However, I'm not a huge fan of Gibbon, because on the whole he was basically a stenographer for the then-current mainstream-approved ruling class. Those volumes contain huge blind spots, and I assert they actually have limited value because the same types of people are running the Western World (which just flowed out of the Greco-Roman one) now as those who were running things during Rome's Empire, so the fact that Edward Gibbons is so revered by them is more than enough evidence to me that it's unlikely to contain definitive scholarship.

Perhaps Gibbons's most egregious error that taints a great deal of what he asserts is his failure to recognize that the Roman Empire did not just suddenly collapse. Not only that, it didn't even 'collapse' during the time period he asserts. Romanism was just borrowed Greekism, which is why it's more accurately referred to as Greco-Romanism. The Romans wimped out and even assimilated the Greek language and perpetuated the exact form of paganism with small editing mostly around name-changes for gods.

But the magic-trick accomplishment that outdoes the US political Party that had the Ku Klux Klan as its military wing persuading blacks that they were their saviors was essentially the perpetuation of Romanism through Constantine's establishment of the Roman Catholic Church. Gibbons declares Christianity the vanquisher of the Roman Empire, but the truth is that as Head Roman -- and soon-to-be Holy Roman Emperor -- Constantine essentially vanquished Christianity, creating a hodgepodge State-enforced Organized Religion that welded together 1/3 Christianity with 2/3 paganism, which continues to this day, perhaps now being 35% Christian/65% pagan, with the mainstream Protestants improving that to a 45% Christian/55% pagan ratio. There is no more effective enemy of the teachings of Christ and Paul than the Organized Religion that at various critical junctures purposefully mistranslated Scripture for the purpose of maintaining control of believers as if they were chattel property.

And when did that end?

Or did it ever?

I suspect the latter is the better question.
The pagan temples were either made into churches or destroyed and their blocks and bricks used to build other things.

In three short years Rome went from its apogee in terms of reach and power to effectively ending as a political entity. In another generation the degenerates who were the embodiment of Roman power and corruption were exterminated.
There is no meaningful distinction between 'churches' and 'pagan temples.'

And the vast number of degenerates just went underground, keeping themselves somewhat invisible until they no longer had to, much like a character such as George Soros had to do for a time.

The ilk of the Roman degenerates just ended up being Inquisitionists and Executioners, Kings, Administrators, Bishops, Popes, Lords and Ladies.

A great many societal ills flow downhill from ruling class men subjugating the bulk of other men -- and from those other men failing to become ungovernable. And I don't think there's much of anything sudden, unexpected or in any other way surprising about what we're likely staring at as our potential near futures.
 
Last edited:
What in my post constituted a prediction?
You don't like 'prophesying,' and you don't like 'predicting.' 'Observing' doesn't suffice for some of your assertions, so how about 'implying' or 'claiming?' What word could I use that you would consider acceptable that would apply to statements of yours like
I'm simply saying that a lot of the things we are challenged by on this forum are themselves rooted in the use of and the culture downstream of birth control use.

You do not see this as a likely possibility but I see it as more likely today than it was four years ago.
Take birth control out of the equation and the societal shift enabled by birth control will end pretty quick.
Granted, it would take drastic action to accomplish but I would not rule this out. The most unlikely things seem to keep happening lately.
In the end, you acknowledged that sudden rejection of birth control is unlikely, but you kept asserting that
Strange things can happen.
. . . and of course they do -- in fact they happen all the time (why are newts following me into my house?) -- but if one refers to the fact that strange things can happen to bolster an implication that the use of birth control is at all likely to suddenly disappear, then we could just as easily claim that anything [fill in the blank] just might happen -- and does that mean we have to add trees raining poop and little green men from Mars and skin turning inside out to the list of what we seriously need to prepare ourselves for?

I fully embrace the fact that black swans exist, but I also rarely agree with most of the self-appointed identifiers of what qualifies as a black swan; the dude you cited has got to be young as well as uninformed (or at least unobservant during my lifetime):
The astonishing success of Google was a black swan; so was 9/11.
Hogwash. The race was on in the early 90s among Yahoo and its then-competitors to become what Google ended up becoming. The casual reader of Wired magazine back then could see Google coming; that our legislators were taken off-guard says much more about how out of touch they were. Same thing with 9/11; the particular set of events was surprising, but warnings of terrorism on our soil were abundant prior to that, especially given that a bomb had already been set off in one of the towers' basement in 1993. [I would assert that (a) the American public was willfully ignorant of the dangers to our homeland from without and even more so from within, which remains the most feasible hypothesis explaining how all that happened that day could have been coordinated with such an element of surprise.]
Birth control is very much at the root of many societal ills. The advent of birth control was pushed by evil people such as lesbian feminists and Marxists who saw it as a tool for destroying Western society. They used it to attack and destroy the family and they've been endlessly successful.

I'm simply saying that a lot of the things we are challenged by on this forum are themselves rooted in the use of and the culture downstream of birth control use.
Many things are pushed by many people, but birth control has ultimately been pushed by a much larger list than lesbian feminists and conniving Marxists.

I will stipulate that birth control has been adopted by many agendas, but before I leave that topic, I have to repeat a theme I've been pushing not just here but elsewhere that reinforces my certainty that, while admittedly cultural devolution is downstream of birth control use, cultural devolution is itself downstream of general male abdication of their collective headship -- the existence and promotion of widespread use of birth control, as with every societal ill I've contemplated, can be laid at the feet of men, not women. Men invented birth control; men invented feminism; men invented all the critical theories; men invented Marxism; men invented Statism; and God certainly invented religion, but human men invented Organized Religion. And it will not be women who will roll any of them back. Women may influence around the edges, but they aren't any more generally capable of uninventing either material objects or wholesale philosophies than they were generally capable of inventing them in the first place.

The blame lies with men, and the solutions are going to require what Zec so aptly referred to as becoming ungovernable, because men in general are guilty of failing to lead, but additionally men in general are guilty of having succumbed to being enslaved or entrapped by the ruling class men who tyrannize us all.

This, in my not-so-humble opinion is the biggest example ever of men falling down on their God-prescribed job of protecting women and children. Male cowardice has led to every fucked up thing we can identify, and it's compounded cowardice to blame women even for the things for which they also bear some responsibility. I can't think of a thing women do that can't be traced back to male abdication of authority, which itself is an example of turning one's collective back on YHWH.

Men cannot lay claim to scriptural authority of headship if men aren't willing to take responsibility for the ramifications of their failures to exercise that headship.
You, my dear friend, are one of the people I am talking about who can't mentally prepare for unexpected events to occur.
This isn't a competition, but I will stipulate that your family is better prepared overall for SHTF than my family and I are -- and @NickF is certainly beyond me in so many ways. However, I'm confident that I'm more prepared than 99% of American citizens. And I'm not talking about physically prepared; I'm even more adamantly asserting that I'm mentally prepared. I've been musing on how to respond to your latest post, Megan, ever since it first came through -- I figured stepping back for a bit was the best tack to take in response to your dragon fire, especially given how deeply I cherish our friendship (which I wouldn't fault anyone for doubting given some of our recent exchanges here on biblicalfamilies.org) -- and here is how I need to lead: I'm a bit befuddled in general about what seems like hurt hostility in much of what you've written, but it's this particular comment . . .
You, my dear friend, are one of the people I am talking about who can't mentally prepare for unexpected events to occur.
. . . that especially confuses me. I'm stumped about why you would say that. The only guess I have is that you might think I'm mentally unprepared for unexpected events because I'm challenging you about whether the unexpected event of women wholesale giving up birth control is likely to occur. But, if so, then you're missing an important distinction: that one is correct or incorrect about whether or not a given unpredictable event will occur is something wholly distinct from whether or not one is mentally prepared for that or any other given unpredictable event.

I think this is responsible for a large degree of why I can't comprehend why you're so vehement about this. What you've written is predominantly an elaborate straw man argument, because, while it contains elements of accurate assessment of what I'm saying, on the whole it's based on suppositions that don't even represent what I've written or what I think. Here's evidence:
  • I agree 100% that a very large portion of our societal devolution is downstream of and caused by the introduction of birth control devices in general and most especially of hormonal birth control (The Pill) in particular. I've written about that extensively here and elsewhere. I've been talking with people about it for more than 2 decades. And . . . I blame men for this as well.
  • If I had a magic wand, I would wave it and eliminate hormonal birth control permanently after a 2-month warning. It's a scourge that has destroyed humanity and hurt women more than it's hurt men, but worst of all it has played a huge role in unraveling the connective fabric of society.
  • On the other hand, while I won't be surprised if hormonal birth control is eventually replaced by something else (the latest contender is the copper IUD), I simply don't have the optimism many in this community have that any amount of backlash against it will result in the general discontinuation of birth control, hormonal or otherwise -- and most certainly not as a sudden event, unexpected or otherwise. Given that we're mostly moral people who place emphasis on and intend to demonstrate obedience to Scripture, we can end up making the mistake that our opinions or those of the people we pay most attention to are representative of the mainstream culture; I probably associate with more 'normals' than the average BF member, I conduct frequent heavy discussions of issues like this, and I see ample evidence of the exact opposite of anything that would inspire optimism that widespread pushback is just over the horizon. Even most self-identified red-pilled edgy conservatives I run into lack faith that anything other than perhaps some enhanced election integrity is in the cards. I know that some people are publicly up in arms about transgenderism (an orchestrated-distraction psy op) and some other things about sex ed in schools, but I see that as just the alt part of "the current thing."
  • I'll believe rejection of birth control to potentially be imminent when I start seeing the following change: a reversal from what is the case right now: the vast majority of parents currently assist their underage daughters in getting onto one form or another of birth control. It's not even a matter of adult females choosing to avail themselves of the option; in more cases than not, parents are still getting their daughters on The Pill or equipped with IUDs to prevent an interruption in what the parents consider to be the proper course of action for their soon-to-be young adult: "Go ahead; have your fun, because we know we're powerless to stop you from hiding the sausage, but make sure you don't get pregnant so you don't ruin your life by having children at an early age instead of going to college and establishing a career that just might save you from being saddled with some male loser who will ruin your life and then leave you destitute when you're older and consequently unable to take care of yourself." That is still the dominant narrative in most households. It's not for most of the members within this particular unrepresentative community, but it's far more ubiquitous than we tend to want to face.
  • Right now, yes, the mainstream culture is becoming aware of the medical dangers of hormonal birth control, so eventually it will be replaced. So, yes, I consider birth control being predominantly eliminated as extremely unlikely -- because the current concern is akin to panic about too much salt; we shouldn't fool ourselves into thinking that the average person waking up about the dangers of hormonal birth control is doing so because of any concerns about the manner in which its presence in our lives has damaged our culture.
  • Furthermore, absent men collectively retaking the reins of their families and of the operation of society, parents and women becoming skittish about even the societal implications of birth control won't come close to trumping this: the original lyrics to the Cyndi Lauper song, Girls Just Want to Have Fun, were, "Girls just want to fuck." And they do; hormonal birth control is probably the primary driver of the new intersexual dynamic in which 80% of the sex girls are having is with 20% of the guys -- girls like sex much more than they used to pretend they did back when I was young; they furthermore embrace their active sexuality as the main source of their power in the war between the sexes. Especially within the context of generations of young girls having been encouraged to do so at their own whims, they're not about to lightly give up having the freedom to do that without pregnancy consequences. So they're going to either successfully demand continued birth control or they'll come up with alternative measures, just as their great grandmothers put up with back alley abortions. Because most mothers for the next couple generations aren't going to successfully deny their daughters the freedom they had in their youth to f*** at will -- for the same reason that parents continue to send their children to college despite knowing exactly what the end results will be.
  • So, yes, I'll be quite surprised if, all-of-a-sudden, women give up birth control and go back to marrying early, having a lot of children and initiating only their share of the divorces. But I fail to comprehend why you would think this kind of sudden event would be something I have to prepare for.
    • First of all, I would entirely welcome it, so whatever adjustment there would be to make, I would welcome it, but . . .
    • As someone whom I've considered more aware of who I am as a person than most of the people I've known in person, I'm really surprised that you think I'm incapable mentally of preparing for unexpected events. While I cogitated about all this today, I gave Kristin a broad outline of this discussion and in the process reminded myself of this: I'm 69 years old and I'm still waiting for the unexpected catastrophe that will overwhelm me. I've had at least two careers that were centered around the fact that one of my talents is not only seeing the stitches on the fastball but calmly and deliberately piecing things back together in the midst of most everyone spinning off into chaos. I've survived falling out of a hearse at 55mph and two near-successful attempts on my life and didn't skip a beat once I got out of the hospitals following each of those experiences. Once, while working at a large university (18K students) in East Texas, the chemistry department had a massive parathion leak. Every bigwig on campus -- the president, the vice presidents, the head of maintenance, the dean of students, various department heads, the chiefs of police from the school and the town, even the city mayor -- all of them turned up, but, even when the camera crews were about to arrive from CNN (which arrived from Houston, a couple hours away), none of them could come up with a plan for how to triage the situation, which also included large numbers of high school students there for a variety of events. So, along with the man who was the liaison between the housing and maintenance departments, he and my 30-year-old self just took over and coordinated everything including triage, transportation to hospitals, prioritized panic counseling, suicide counseling, and rearranging the cafeteria schedule and its staff to ensure that everyone got fed where they were instead of in the cafeterias that were located closer to the leak (I wasn't aware of CNN at the time, but my parents saw me live on television from several states away). When the world speeds up for everyone else, for me it slows down and my reactions get better. I don't know what your criteria are for determining preparedness for unexpected events, but my life has demonstrated that I tend to be very prepared for whatever comes my way. Maybe I'm just being unenlightened about this, but I just can't come up with grokking how resisting seeing the potential for a sudden full rejection of birth control could leave me in the dust.
 
Romanism was just borrowed Greekism, which is why it's more accurately referred to as Greco-Romanism.
Good observation, with strong parallels for today.

The present US-centric world order is really more accurately an Anglo-US order, because the loose empire that exists today really was established by the British Empire. The Empire split in two at the American War of Independence, which parallels the split of the Roman Empire into West and East, but after the animosity died down the Empire still largely remained united - the USA and the Commonwealth have been allies in all major wars for the past century and continue to be allied in the Five Eyes, AUKUS and other such arrangements. All that really happened was that the dominant seat of government shifted from London to Washington. This whole collective parallels the Roman Empire.

And that Anglo-US order is even more broadly a European world order, as its fundamental root is European colonialism gaining control of the world. And as such, this European-led world order has lasted for about 500 years. And this Spanish / Dutch -> English empire progression parallels the ancient situation of Greco-Romanism, which grew first from the Greeks conquering the known world and establishing a Greek empire, which was then replaced with a later Roman empire.

There is nothing new under the sun. The only real question is whether this falling empire will be replaced by numerous smaller states (as the Western Roman empire was replaced by), or another more oppressive empire (as the Eastern Roman empire was replaced by the Ottoman Empire). That is very debatable, and might be different for different parts of the present Empire.
 
Men cannot lay claim to scriptural authority of headship if men aren't willing to take responsibility for the ramifications of their failures to exercise that headship.

I say this all the time and people get pissed off at me for saying it.

You are right that birth control was invented by and legalized by men. They own this.

And where I said that ending birth control is unlikely yet I won't rule it out then this is a more neutral position than a prediction that such a thing is going to happen.

We own a lot of fire extinguishers and if we ever need them it doesn't mean we're a bunch of prophets. ;)
The only guess I have is that you might think I'm mentally unprepared for unexpected events because I'm challenging you about whether the unexpected event of women wholesale giving up birth control is likely to occur.

Right here (below) is where you shifted gears from saying that getting rid of birth control was unlikely (which I said, too) to recasting my comment as a wishful-thinking prediction.

This is you demonstrating your inability to even conceive of the event occurring regardless of how I disclaimed it as unlikely.

But you're not just observing in the case of what we're talking about; you're just making a wishful-thinking prediction.

Remember I am not wired the same as most everyone else. I am rarely 'surprised' by things that happen around me. It is not my nature to be in denial that things happen or that perhaps outlandish and unlikely things can happen.

I'm also not sure I am even capable of wishful thinking. If I were I suppose I'd ignore the math and buy a lottery ticket.
 
As it's relevant to our discussion, here's a link to my latest Substack article, something requested by numerous people in the wake of my September 5 "Are We Not Mules?" essay. I wrote the first draft 2 weeks ago and finally finished editing it today. You'll recognize some of it as having already made it into posts I've made in the past few days in this particular thread:


[TL/DR:CAMERA warning]
 
Back
Top