• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Polygyny and American Individualism

southernphotini

Member
Female
So one thing the man who I'm considering becoming a second wife to told me was that he was surprised at how quickly I adapted to the idea.

I think part of it is because I'm Eastern Orthodox, and so spend a lot of time trying to understand how ancient people saw the world. We tend to view everything through a modern lens and thinking we're far more brilliant than those who come before, and I have been trying to unlearn that. Resources like the The Lord of Spirits podcast, The Symbolic World, and Jordan Peterson have been very useful in that endeavor. Along with the hymns in the church.

Now that polygyny is a potential future rather than an abstract idea, and I'm encountering problems and I see the problems others are encountering, I have been thinking about how a modern American worldview may be at odds with the practice of polygyny by the ancients.

I read a cool thing about how English individualism came about due to the influx of Germanic migrants, who left behind the familial and tribal ties that bound them. The American immigration experience was an even starker cut with any tribal ideas, which is why rugged American individualism is a core part of our national identity.

But polygyny is the opposite of individualism. It's essentially a tribal idea. Moses, Abraham, and Jacob were all essentially proto-Bedouin tribal leaders. The Hebrews were tribalist, not individualists. Behaving like a "rugged individualist" was to risk being ostracized from society. Our perspective as modern Americans is vastly different from that of ancient villagers in the Judean desert.

And it's a little too easy for modern people to conflate tribalism with communism, the idea that you lose everything to an idea rather than join a family.

So in Orthodoxy our churches take on just a bit of tribal flavor. There's a particular identity of belonging that it takes American converts some time to adjust to... And we have patron saints, and we view that in a similar way as the ancient Roman patronage system. My patron is Photini (Samaritan Woman) and so I'm on her "team" in a sense. And we are basically obsessed with the Psalms, which charts a very clear image of being a tribal person while still having a unique identity.

I was raised Southern Baptist and becoming Orthodox required me to undergo a significant change in perspective, particularly away from the American Protestant perspective. So the idea that my future is "me-centric" and highly individualistic is no longer as much of a thing. Compared to Augustine, Chrysostom, or Evagrius Ponticus, the idea that my own thoughts are somehow new and brilliant becomes a bit silly. It took four women to birth the 12 tribes of Israel, so why would I think I can do everything alone?

The tribalism in the modern Middle East, much like ancient European tribalism, has a dark side of honor killings and ancient feuds. I'm not certain tribalism is an unqualified good. It has pros and cons, but it did keep the covenant with God alive until the Messiah came.

But American individualism also isn't an unqualified good, and it seems to me that some of the issues I see, admittedly especially on reality tv shows about polygyny, has to do with an unhealthy individualism. It seems that polygynist families that have a healthy tribal nature that doesn't devolve into communal cult seem to fare better than those who have a focus on individualism.

And so perhaps the fact that my journey into Orthodoxy has made me more adaptable to the idea of polygyny has also made me in a way less typically American.

I'm rambling but I think my point was that American individualism seems to really butt heads with the ideas of patriarchy and polygyny.
 
So one thing the man who I'm considering becoming a second wife to told me was that he was surprised at how quickly I adapted to the idea.

I think part of it is because I'm Eastern Orthodox, and so spend a lot of time trying to understand how ancient people saw the world. We tend to view everything through a modern lens and thinking we're far more brilliant than those who come before, and I have been trying to unlearn that. Resources like the The Lord of Spirits podcast, The Symbolic World, and Jordan Peterson have been very useful in that endeavor. Along with the hymns in the church.

Now that polygyny is a potential future rather than an abstract idea, and I'm encountering problems and I see the problems others are encountering, I have been thinking about how a modern American worldview may be at odds with the practice of polygyny by the ancients.

I read a cool thing about how English individualism came about due to the influx of Germanic migrants, who left behind the familial and tribal ties that bound them. The American immigration experience was an even starker cut with any tribal ideas, which is why rugged American individualism is a core part of our national identity.

But polygyny is the opposite of individualism. It's essentially a tribal idea. Moses, Abraham, and Jacob were all essentially proto-Bedouin tribal leaders. The Hebrews were tribalist, not individualists. Behaving like a "rugged individualist" was to risk being ostracized from society. Our perspective as modern Americans is vastly different from that of ancient villagers in the Judean desert.

And it's a little too easy for modern people to conflate tribalism with communism, the idea that you lose everything to an idea rather than join a family.

So in Orthodoxy our churches take on just a bit of tribal flavor. There's a particular identity of belonging that it takes American converts some time to adjust to... And we have patron saints, and we view that in a similar way as the ancient Roman patronage system. My patron is Photini (Samaritan Woman) and so I'm on her "team" in a sense. And we are basically obsessed with the Psalms, which charts a very clear image of being a tribal person while still having a unique identity.

I was raised Southern Baptist and becoming Orthodox required me to undergo a significant change in perspective, particularly away from the American Protestant perspective. So the idea that my future is "me-centric" and highly individualistic is no longer as much of a thing. Compared to Augustine, Chrysostom, or Evagrius Ponticus, the idea that my own thoughts are somehow new and brilliant becomes a bit silly. It took four women to birth the 12 tribes of Israel, so why would I think I can do everything alone?

The tribalism in the modern Middle East, much like ancient European tribalism, has a dark side of honor killings and ancient feuds. I'm not certain tribalism is an unqualified good. It has pros and cons, but it did keep the covenant with God alive until the Messiah came.

But American individualism also isn't an unqualified good, and it seems to me that some of the issues I see, admittedly especially on reality tv shows about polygyny, has to do with an unhealthy individualism. It seems that polygynist families that have a healthy tribal nature that doesn't devolve into communal cult seem to fare better than those who have a focus on individualism.

And so perhaps the fact that my journey into Orthodoxy has made me more adaptable to the idea of polygyny has also made me in a way less typically American.

I'm rambling but I think my point was that American individualism seems to really butt heads with the ideas of patriarchy and polygyny.
I think this is a common problem across the West. In Brazil, individualism is also very strong. And in Brazil there is legislation that promotes individualism, people are increasingly selfish and difficult
 
Laws in western countries were made to weaken "family tribes". It's anti-family laws that make people selfish and individualistic
 
Individualism built this country, but they built it for their families.
Today’s narcissism is not the individualism of yesteryear. Don’t confuse the two.
 
Individualism is Christian value because Lord values us and judge us as individuals. Lord doesn't judge whole families nor values whole families.

Everybody answers his own sins, not his families sins.
 
Individualism is Christian value because Lord values us and judge us as individuals. Lord doesn't judge whole families nor values whole families.

Everybody answers his own sins, not his families sins.

All our individual sins contribute to the sin in the world. Our sin doesn't only affect us in a vacuum.

And God judges entire nations. Exodus is a good example of that.
 
I married into a large family. Many years ago someone left a message on outlr answering machine asking if some of "our people" could use an item they were offering. It sounded strange then. A local rancher calls our oldest daughter "That clan girl" and she loves to engage in witty banter with him.

Each family is like a unique blend of the two family cultures that came together. With polgyny you get three or more blended. I see this as a good thing.

Socialism may be a bad way to run a country, but a very good way to run a family. The difference being in a family there is trust and love for everyone. Trusting the husband to manage the direction and goals can get you so much further then working alone. Our family bought a property in 2020 and paid it off in six months. It was a team effort, and will provide opportunities for all, not just the son that is currently using that big open room to sew tents.

We work to provide opportunities to earn an inheritance for our children....and of course to put good food on the table. These guys didn't get taller then dad on a diet!

The momentum and energy you can create on big projects is impressive! Six men are a crew that can make a difference! Trying to hire laborers while our boys grew up was rough! Now that they work together we have a reliable team.

I think if people could see and experience the blessings of working together more would do it. People seem to like seeing our family work, and succeed. I just hope it catches on!
 
It’s hard not to be an individualist when you have no equals. I tried fitting in but I was just too damn exceptional. It’s a curse. I wish I wasn’t this great but I guess someone has to bear the burden. You’re all welcome. I know it looks glamorous from down there but none of you could hack the pressure. Hell, even I get a little weary of it sometimes.
 
Individualism is Christian value because Lord values us and judge us as individuals. Lord doesn't judge whole families nor values whole families.

Everybody answers his own sins, not his families sins.
That’s not entirely true, but I don’t have the time right now.
 
Individualism is Christian value because Lord values us and judge us as individuals. Lord doesn't judge whole families nor values whole families.

Everybody answers his own sins, not his families sins.
Theres actually plenty of examples of both punishments for entire families for things the head did think Korah, or how the sword will never leave David's house because of Bathsheba. An example of community judgment is when Israel went astray as a nation, 40 years in the wilderness, consider also the 7 churches.
 
I read a cool thing about how English individualism came about due to the influx of Germanic migrants, who left behind the familial and tribal ties that bound them. The American immigration experience was an even starker cut with any tribal ideas, which is why rugged American individualism is a core part of our national identity.

Americans are fundamentally a product of the land. We changed it and it changed us. But our individualism was not at all like the individualism of today. We were still at heart a European, tribal, people.

But it wasn't individuals who homesteaded this country, cutting a civilization out of the wilderness. It was families and communities. Early settlement was done as groups, with whole churches establishing New England towns together. And while later settlement of regions to the west was done on an individual basis, people still operated as part of community. Harvests were jointly done. Putting up a barn was a community effort. If a man got sick the community came together to care for the farm and family; this still happens in some rural farming communities to this day. A farmer has a heart attack during harvest, the next day 50 combines show up and it's all done in a day. The Amish likewise still engage in barn raisings.

So too were people arranged in families. People related family to family. Daughters were protected and the authority of the father recognized and respected; there was no such thing as dating, you needed the permission of the father to meet with her to talk about marriage, which also would only happen with his approval. People respected the teachings of their parents and elders and adopted their morals.

But what the settlement of this country did was instill was a huge dosage of self-reliance and independence. Out in the wilderness of woods and prairie there was no government to save us, no Lord to come riding in and chase off the Indians, no merchant to buy all sustenance from. We protected ourselves and fed ourselves or we starved out. Only the strong, the hardworking, the self-reliant survived.

This made it hard to rule us. But it also made us susceptible to the siren song of hyper-individualism. But we still respected faith, family, and community.

All of this changed in the 20th century. Industrialization and the modern economy relaxed our dependence on our own effort for survival, modern machines meant we no longer needed our neighbors help and modern education and appliances made the wife nearly extraneous. The home economy was dead.

With the rise of mass media and corporate banker control of the economy those in charge engaged in the largest social engineering effort in human history. Almost everything about America today is fake and engineered. The modified economy served to sever people's relationships to community and family, things which were replaced with consumerism. Public schooling and mass media severed the relationships between generations. We were inculcated with new ideas, new morals, new ways of life. No longer was family and father respected but it was now 'you can't tell me what to do'. Ancient moralities, the time tested wisdoms of the ages were tossed out and slandered for merely being 'not modern'. The family is now merely the evening caregiver and the father a walking wallet with no authority over family, wife or children.

One of the propaganda myths was that of progress. Everything old is bad and new is good. Yet I have observed how the laws and economics of 5000 year old societies are in many ways superior to our own. Societies are living organisms and the rise and fall like any other. And in our day things are in collapse. A collapse engendered in large part by social dissolution caused by our rejection of the wisdom of our forefathers in matters of marriage and morality. Much of my life has been spent in recovering the ways of life, wisdom, and moralities of my grandparents and great-grandparents generations.
 
All our individual sins contribute to the sin in the world. Our sin doesn't only affect us in a vacuum.

And God judges entire nations. Exodus is a good example of that.

Theres actually plenty of examples of both punishments for entire families for things the head did think Korah, or how the sword will never leave David's house because of Bathsheba. An example of community judgment is when Israel went astray as a nation, 40 years in the wilderness, consider also the 7 churches.
Exceptions.

When son kills somebody who is guilty? He or his head of household?

General movement towards individual responsibility for crimes in ancient world comes from Christianity.
 
Americans are fundamentally a product of the land. We changed it and it changed us. But our individualism was not at all like the individualism of today. We were still at heart a European, tribal, people.

But it wasn't individuals who homesteaded this country, cutting a civilization out of the wilderness. It was families and communities. Early settlement was done as groups, with whole churches establishing New England towns together. And while later settlement of regions to the west was done on an individual basis, people still operated as part of community. Harvests were jointly done. Putting up a barn was a community effort. If a man got sick the community came together to care for the farm and family; this still happens in some rural farming communities to this day. A farmer has a heart attack during harvest, the next day 50 combines show up and it's all done in a day. The Amish likewise still engage in barn raisings.

So too were people arranged in families. People related family to family. Daughters were protected and the authority of the father recognized and respected; there was no such thing as dating, you needed the permission of the father to meet with her to talk about marriage, which also would only happen with his approval. People respected the teachings of their parents and elders and adopted their morals.

But what the settlement of this country did was instill was a huge dosage of self-reliance and independence. Out in the wilderness of woods and prairie there was no government to save us, no Lord to come riding in and chase off the Indians, no merchant to buy all sustenance from. We protected ourselves and fed ourselves or we starved out. Only the strong, the hardworking, the self-reliant survived.

This made it hard to rule us. But it also made us susceptible to the siren song of hyper-individualism. But we still respected faith, family, and community.

All of this changed in the 20th century. Industrialization and the modern economy relaxed our dependence on our own effort for survival, modern machines meant we no longer needed our neighbors help and modern education and appliances made the wife nearly extraneous. The home economy was dead.

With the rise of mass media and corporate banker control of the economy those in charge engaged in the largest social engineering effort in human history. Almost everything about America today is fake and engineered. The modified economy served to sever people's relationships to community and family, things which were replaced with consumerism. Public schooling and mass media severed the relationships between generations. We were inculcated with new ideas, new morals, new ways of life. No longer was family and father respected but it was now 'you can't tell me what to do'. Ancient moralities, the time tested wisdoms of the ages were tossed out and slandered for merely being 'not modern'. The family is now merely the evening caregiver and the father a walking wallet with no authority over family, wife or children.

One of the propaganda myths was that of progress. Everything old is bad and new is good. Yet I have observed how the laws and economics of 5000 year old societies are in many ways superior to our own. Societies are living organisms and the rise and fall like any other. And in our day things are in collapse. A collapse engendered in large part by social dissolution caused by our rejection of the wisdom of our forefathers in matters of marriage and morality. Much of my life has been spent in recovering the ways of life, wisdom, and moralities of my grandparents and great-grandparents generations.

I think there may be a crossed wire here between tribe and nuclear family. The nuclear family is a fairly modern concept.
 
Exceptions.

When son kills somebody who is guilty? He or his head of household?

General movement towards individual responsibility for crimes in ancient world comes from Christianity.
Who was responsible for the rape of Dinah? Who bore the consequences?

Who was responsible for Pharoah’s hard heart? Who bore the consequences?
 
Exceptions.

When son kills somebody who is guilty? He or his head of household?

General movement towards individual responsibility for crimes in ancient world comes from Christianity.
Whose sin was John the Baptist paying for? Stephen? Peter? Paul?

Take it further, was Christ experiencing the consequences of His own sin?
 
What isn’t recognized nowadays is ownership. Ownership of the family, starting with the wife/wives.
With ownership comes responsibility.
No man should correct another man’s wife. If there is a problem that needs to be addressed, go to her owner. She, and everything that she does, is his responsibility. But Yah’s method of dealing with things isn’t taught today. That doesn’t prove that it doesn’t exist.
The husband is responsible for what his family does, even if society doesn’t recognize it.

On a forum such as this, though, there is no male nor female. Of course we will be a bit gentler with females (hopefully 😉) but statements made will stand on their own, open to direct correction/criticism.
 
Whose sin was John the Baptist paying for? Stephen? Peter? Paul?

Take it further, was Christ experiencing the consequences of His own sin?
John Baptist's execution was crime. He was innocent. What are sins of Stephen, Paul and Peter?

Christ has taken payment of our sins voluntary. In principle same as when you pay fine for somebody else.

Sins include crimes. Is it victims who suffer. Thats way they are victims, but punishment always pays on offender. Otherwise isn't justice.

Pharaoh was offender against Israel by ordering killing male babies.
 
John Baptist's execution was crime. He was innocent. What are sins of Stephen, Paul and Peter?

Christ has taken payment of our sins voluntary. In principle same as when you pay fine for somebody else.

Sins include crimes. Is it victims who suffer. Thats way they are victims, but punishment always pays on offender. Otherwise isn't justice.

Pharaoh was offender against Israel by ordering killing male babies.
A victim bears the consequences of someone else's sin. That's my point.

Sin is not individualistic. It affects more than the offender. Both OT and NT demonstrate that over and over.
 
Back
Top