• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Random Comments

A big part of the problem:

www.dailymail.co.uk

MAGA is the leading RED FLAG for 18-34-year-old women

A fascinating survey has revealed the most common turn-ons and turn-offs among 18-34-year-old men and women in the U.S.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Note that believing there are "only two genders" (!) and thinking that "ALL lives matter" turns off 58 to 60% of 'women' age 18-34.

I note that the survey didn't ask about men actually having testosterone.
 
Given that in their survey both men and women overwhelmingly disagreed with MAGA (59-76%), yet Trump would be sitting around the 50% mark in any election (e.g. the last one), they have apparently surveyed a biased group of people who do not reflect the average voter and have left a large chunk of the population unrepresented. Take the results with a grain of salt.
 
Someone somewhere (maybe here) pointed out that RFK's role in the upcoming election may be to run as an independent as the Democrat's last hope to beat Trump. A head-to-head between Trump and any other Democrat would be obviously won by Trump. But if RFK runs as an independent, he may peel off enough support from Trump to let the Democrat candidate win. It's basically the only scenario in which Biden or a replacement can win.

Looks like that is definitely the way things are going:

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
RFK won't be trying to help the Democrat establishment get a bad candidate back in, he'll be genuinely trying to become president himself. But like any politician he may be easily manipulated to get carried away in the campaign and not see the bigger picture.
 
FollowingHim said:
Given that in their survey both men and women overwhelmingly disagreed with MAGA (59-76%), yet Trump would be sitting around the 50% mark in any election (e.g. the last one), they have apparently surveyed a biased group of people who do not reflect the average voter and have left a large chunk of the population unrepresented. Take the results with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...
Or could be that younger voters are less inclined to be MAGA voters than older people who are generally much more conservative.
 
FollowingHim said:
Given that in their survey both men and women overwhelmingly disagreed with MAGA (59-76%), yet Trump would be sitting around the 50% mark in any election (e.g. the last one), they have apparently surveyed a biased group of people who do not reflect the average voter and have left a large chunk of the population unrepresented. Take the results with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...
 
In reality, less than 10% of single women in Western culture would actually qualify as wives for most of us.
 
FollowingHim said:
Given that in their survey both men and women overwhelmingly disagreed with MAGA (59-76%), yet Trump would be sitting around the 50% mark in any election (e.g. the last one), they have apparently surveyed a biased group of people who do not reflect the average voter and have left a large chunk of the population unrepresented. Take the results with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...
Trump won in 2016 not thanks to popular vote, but thanks to electoral college. So having less than 50% isn't bad.

Haven't you noticed that being conservatives is woman's biggest red flag?
 
Last edited:
Bina said:
Add a scoop of ice cream and I'm arriving uninvited
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t have thought of that, but now that you mention it, I’m all in! 😁
 
Mark C said:
And purveyors of the NOT-vaccines destroy current and future customers.
Click to expand...
Which explains why they have to make billions doing it.
 
Mark C said:
And purveyors of the NOT-vaccines destroy current and future customers.
Click to expand...
No, they create many more customers. A few die, but many more get health issues that will make them life-long customers of the pharmaceutical companies, so on balance they get more. And infertility will give more customers for fertility treatments also.
 
Mark C said:
And purveyors of the NOT-vaccines destroy current and future customers.
Click to expand...
That's Babylon. It cares not for the souls of men. Belief in an immortal soul makes people miss the fulfillment there is in killing mortal people.
 
FollowingHim said:
No, they create many more customers. A few die, but many more get health issues that will make them life-long customers of the pharmaceutical companies, so on balance they get more.
Click to expand...
OK, good point, but it's both. And, as we've seen - the best way to create "customers" is by outright coercion.

And, don't forget, in the communist model (OK, actually, the public-private partnership is the essence of fascism, but the difference is trite) providing "products or services" to a hypothetical "customer" is passe' anyway.

Their 'business model' is shifted by subsidies, tax breaks, credits, incentives, and outright bribes.

The real customer is Big Brother, and the product is death for most.
 
NBTX11 said:
What is the current percentage of liberal women to conservative women in the US. By this survey, there are a lot more liberal women than conservative women.
Click to expand...
Indeed.

Probably 2/3 of the supportive protestors during Black Lives Matter events are white women between the ages of 18 and 30.

Besides virtue signaling, I highly suspect I know what else they're signaling for by such participation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top