• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Random Comments


As the story says, this guy may be an idiot, but at least he wasn't wearing high heels and fake boobs.

PS> And how did the Navy ever allow this to get published in the first place!!!? Maybe it's DEI recruiting.
They have too much visible rust on ships to say otherwise.
 
Last edited:
If Alex is right then it's illegal to pay taxes:
...
Long story, but the point is MUCH bigger:

It's not "illegal" to VOLUNTEER to GIVE fake money to anyone, or anything, including the "IRS." IF you agree "under penalty of perjury" - you have ALREADY volunteered to surrender any Rights under the 5th Amendment, so it's no longer 'illegal' to force such a VOLUNTEER to keep volunteering...
 
If Alex is right then it's illegal to pay taxes:

It's very interesting reasoning. But the major problem with it is that it relies on UN documents which have then been ratified into local laws - in other words, by following this strategy you are effectively acknowledging the legitimacy of the UN, and that it has authority over your local government. Because there is a conflict of laws here - UN saying "don't fund war" and local government saying "pay your taxes". By saying that the first overrides the second you are saying the UN can override the local government. That is a very dangerous road to go down, as it is exactly what the global powers that be are doing themselves giving more authority to the WHO etc. While if we truly believe in the sovereignty of individual nations, then this is irrelevant and you need to pay your taxes.
 
It's very interesting reasoning. But the major problem with it is that it relies on UN documents which have then been ratified into local laws - in other words, by following this strategy you are effectively acknowledging the legitimacy of the UN, and that it has authority over your local government. Because there is a conflict of laws here - UN saying "don't fund war" and local government saying "pay your taxes". By saying that the first overrides the second you are saying the UN can override the local government. That is a very dangerous road to go down, as it is exactly what the global powers that be are doing themselves giving more authority to the WHO etc. While if we truly believe in the sovereignty of individual nations, then this is irrelevant and you need to pay your taxes.
Is ratification mandatory?

If no, then UN laws are just suggestions. If so, local government has has voluntary limited itself by their own choice. They can suck it now.

And practically speaking, one can be against something and use same thing against government. I don't support constitutions, but have zero problems invoking constitution to protect against government.

Same logic here.
 
It's very interesting reasoning. But the major problem with it is that it relies on UN documents which have then been ratified into local laws - in other words, by following this strategy you are effectively acknowledging the legitimacy of the UN, and that it has authority over your local government.
Which is true, but only a microcosm of the bigger Truth.


Because there is a conflict of laws here - UN saying "don't fund war" and local government saying "pay your taxes". By saying that the first overrides the second you are saying the UN can override the local government. That is a very dangerous road to go down...

...and PRECISELY why the Founders, in the Declaration of Independence laid out the fundamental premise:

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident..."

In a modern paraphrase, that there IS a Creator, that He made mankind, and gave us Rights, and that,
"to secure these Rights, governments are instituted among men."

KEY: There is a singular purpose for government among men: To SECURE the God-given Rights they have from their Creator.

as it is exactly what the global powers that be are doing themselves giving more authority to the WHO etc. While if we truly believe in the sovereignty of individual nations, then this is irrelevant and you need to pay your taxes.
The cannot 'delegate' a power they do NOT have!

The ancient "Maxim of Law" is that the "created can be no greater than the creator." There is ONE, and only One, Ultimate Creator and Giver of Life (and 'Law'.)

ALL lawful power and authority descends directly from Him, and this was the essence of the understanding expressed in the Declaration.

He created man ('Adam-kind') and gave him life, responsibility, and authority.

Man, in his turn, MAY create 'entities' - partnerships, treaties, associations, 'governments,' - to do things for him, and delegate SOME of his authority to that creation. But it is NEVER the 'master' (unless men, in rebellion, choose to serve 'the creation rather than the Creator.')

Which is why "choice of law" (look it up in a law dictionary, like Black's, or Bouvier's,) is so vital to understand, and why we can't serve two masters: "Choose this day Whom you will serve."
 
"Blessed euro":

Wasn't able to reproduce
I've only got older style euro notes with slightly different imagery, but I can see how he did it. He folded it in a specific place, so the "demon" is formed from the top of Scandinavia in the map that appears on the back of every euro note. The "mouth" is the Gulf of Bothnia and the "eye" is the White Sea. In other words, if you fold any map of the world in the right way you can make something that looks like a picture of a demon - and the euro note just happens to have a map on it.

It's silly. Ignore it.
 
Back
Top