• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Meat Reacting to Polygamia Triumphatrix By Johann Lyser

The Revolting Man said:
Give us the elevator pitch on this book.
Click to expand...
This book is a forceful pro-polygamy polemic, arguing specifically for male polygyny: one husband having several wives. From the sections visible in the translation, the author treats marriage not as adultery or concubinage but as a lawful marital arrangement that, he says, is compatible with natural law, divine law, civil law, and the law of nations. A major part of the book is devoted to attacking "anti-polygamists" and insisting that they are mistaken because Scripture never plainly forbids patriarchal polygamy. The author repeatedly appeals to biblical figures such as Abraham, Jacob, David, and Solomon, presenting their multiple marriages as evidence that polygyny can be a real and legitimate form of marriage.

A second major topic is the claim that marriage is primarily a civil or political institution, not essentially an ecclesiastical sacrament. The author leans heavily on legal and political reasoning, citing Roman law, canon-law disputes, Protestant writers, and reform-era arguments about magistrates' authority over marriage. He argues that churches, especially under what he sees as later Catholic distortions, wrongly turned marriage into a sacramental mechanism of control. In that sense, the book is not only about household arrangements; it is also about who has authority to define marriage - priests and theologians, or civil rulers and political communities.

The book also spends a great deal of time on gender hierarchy and household order. Its defense of polygyny is tied to an overtly patriarchal theory: the husband is said to rule, the wife to obey, and women are repeatedly described as naturally subordinate and suited to domestic life. The author argues that multiple wives improve the household by increasing fertility, childrearing capacity, domestic labor, and sexual regulation, especially when one wife is pregnant, ill, or otherwise unavailable. He also insists that polygyny is better than adultery, fornication, or illicit sex because it channels male desire into a formally recognized household structure.

So the author's conclusion is quite clear: he believes male polygamy is lawful, natural, scriptural, socially useful, and unjustly condemned. He rejects the idea that monogamy is the only divinely intended form of marriage, arguing instead that monogamy may be common but is not universally binding by nature or by Scripture. That said, this summary should be treated cautiously because the document is a machine-generated translation and some passages are visibly garbled or unstable. Even so, the overall line of argument is consistent enough to say with confidence that the work is a learned, legal-theological defense of patriarchal polygyny against both religious and civil critics.
 
Here is one controversial quote that got some discussion.

"Since there are indeed many kinds of servitude, I know not whether any can be called more severe and detestable than that domestic slavery by which a head of a household submits to his wife, ready to sail at her nod and pleasure for all her desires."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top