Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
Since 'small amount' is very likely VERY small amount, and much smaller that people have been led to believe (ZERO is small, too!) it might matter a very great deal.
Point is that China, Russia, BRICS are positioning for a move that will leave the fiat $$ "worth-less." (Thus, the Crack Up Boom, more than likely, as the final collapse mechanism.)
Since 'small amount' is very likely VERY small amount, and much smaller that people have been led to believe (ZERO is small, too!) it might matter a very great deal.
Point is that China, Russia, BRICS are positioning for a move that will leave the fiat $$ "worth-less." (Thus, the Crack Up Boom, more than likely, as the final collapse mechanism.)
Idea of returning bond principal with some gold is from some official from US admistration. Possible creator of SOFR or someone conected with him. Someone who can be expected to access to real information.
If you can't trust the people who tried and failed to kill the president, but only after they tried to kill millions with the "safe and effective" Zyklon-B injection, Who CAN you trust???
Idea of returning bond principal with some gold is from some official from US admistration. Possible creator of SOFR or someone conected with him. Someone who can be expected to access to real information.
That much gold being released on the market would have been impossible to ignore. Most of it is still somewhere under American control.
Why would they sell the gold anyway? Everyone has been trading their souls for valueless greenbacks for a hundred years now. Why wouldn’t you hoard the file and give away the paper? There’s just no reason to sell that gold or indication that they did.
If you can't trust the people who tried and failed to kill the president, but only after they tried to kill millions with the "safe and effective" Zyklon-B injection, Who CAN you trust???
... but then why do they refuse to have an audit? It is the lack of audits which makes everyone suspicious. Maybe you're right, but they're behaving like you're wrong.
... but then why do they refuse to have an audit? It is the lack of audits which makes everyone suspicious. Maybe you're right, but they're behaving like you're wrong.
... but then why do they refuse to have an audit? It is the lack of audits which makes everyone suspicious. Maybe you're right, but they're behaving like you're wrong.
They have publicised a massive number, which is an invitation to thieves. The suspicion is that they have none.
This is the exact opposite of what Russia and China are doing. China declares one number for their gold reserves but are widely suspected to actually hold a lot more than that, due to gold imports being far higher than what is declared. You are correct that there are reasons for China & Russia to hide their gold reserves, but it's irrelevant.
September 20, 1974: The inspection by Members of Congress on September 23, 1974, of U.S. gold stocks stored at the Fort Knox Bullion Depository marks a unique departure from the long standing and rigidly enforced policy of absolutely no visitors.
www.usmint.gov
According to this link, and it is a government link, a creditable audit was done by Congress with journalists in attendance in 1974. This is significant for several reasons.
Obviously it requires you to trust Congress and the media which none of us do, but importantly 1974 is three years after France forced Nixon to finally kill the last vestiges of the gold standard; allegedly temporarily.
There are a lot of details here that I haven’t looked into yet but apparently France demanded to exchange their dollars for gold as was allegedly their right under the Breton Woods agreement (there were two of them and I don’t know the difference).
Nixon flat out told them no. In a very French move they had sent a warship to make the demand for some reason. The speculation was that we didn’t have the gold (which I think was true in part. We didn’t have the gold to cover all the dollars that could come looking for it). This audit was done to quiet those fears.
We were supposed to go back on the limited gold standard at some unspecified point but obviously that didn’t happen.
It looks like there might have only ever been two audits of the gold depository, one during World War II and this one in ‘74. I’ll keep looking.
For some reason I didn’t realize that Fort Knox is tied directly to Roosevelt’s gold confiscation of 1933. I thought it was a much older and more intrinsically American institution. It’s nothing but a pile of stolen wealth taken from Americans at gun point.
September 20, 1974: The inspection by Members of Congress on September 23, 1974, of U.S. gold stocks stored at the Fort Knox Bullion Depository marks a unique departure from the long standing and rigidly enforced policy of absolutely no visitors.
www.usmint.gov
According to this link, and it is a government link, a creditable audit was done by Congress with journalists in attendance in 1974. This is significant for several reasons.
Obviously it requires you to trust Congress and the media which none of us do, but importantly 1974 is three years after France forced Nixon to finally kill the last vestiges of the gold standard; allegedly temporarily.
There are a lot of details here that I haven’t looked into yet but apparently France demanded to exchange their dollars for gold as was allegedly their right under the Breton Woods agreement (there were two of them and I don’t know the difference).
Nixon flat out told them no. In a very French move they had sent a warship to make the demand for some reason. The speculation was that we didn’t have the gold (which I think was true in part. We didn’t have the gold to cover all the dollars that could come looking for it). This audit was done to quiet those fears.
We were supposed to go back on the limited gold standard at some unspecified point but obviously that didn’t happen.
1971 was temporary suspension, while in 1973 was forever suspension.
Issue is that there was fixed price between dollars and gold (only for US government). Since Vietnam war and Great Society programs were financed with deficits, it's highly likely money printing was involved which would push up gold price. So obvious protection is not to receive dollar (losing value), but insist on gold.
If dollar amount in circulation was raised 10x, gold price in dollars would go up about same amount, so gold would protect value.
And since US had trade deficit (imports greater than export), other countries were shipping real wealth in US, while getting paper wealth. So, off course French desired real money.
Regular ones aren't exactly a problem. The problem is ones supported by color revolutions and similar approaches. Such guys could make national reserves be used for payments for IMF "service" etc.