Yes, there is a movement to take away women’s right to vote

[indigenouspolygynist]

Smarts are not the same as wisdom or discernment.

I’m not a Republican, nor do I think they are somehow morally superior, but the Dems have been wholly captured by dark forces set on destroying Western Christian society.

I've met a lot of men who lack both wisdom and discernment. We have an entire generation of men who haven't grown up. Ben Sasse wrote a book about it. If you look at the marriage subreddit, at least a third of the posts are women complaining about being married to a man child. Even before that, I think many men from previous generations grew into old fools, but they were better at presenting as adults.

I may be the final decision maker in my marriage, but I would be a fool if I didn't involve my wife in all of our decisions. She's very wise. I wouldn't have married her is she wasn't. I could never marry someone I don't respect.

 

[Mojo]

I've met a lot of men who lack both wisdom and discernment. We have an entire generation of men who haven't grown up. Ben Sasse wrote a book about it. If you look at the marriage subreddit, at least a third of the posts are women complaining about being married to a man child. Even before that, I think many men from previous generations grew into old fools, but they were better at presenting as adults.

I may be the final decision maker in my marriage, but I would be a fool if I didn't involve my wife in all of our decisions. She's very wise. I wouldn't have married her is she wasn't. I could never marry someone I don't respect.

You may have misunderstood my reply. I wasn’t implying women (universal) lack wisdom or discernment.

The facts and demographics don’t lie. The Dems are increasingly the party of single, childless, secular women. It’s the party that brought you Covid lockdowns, transing of kids, open boarders and the strange alliance of queers for Palestine. That has all the fingerprints of females acting without wisdom or discernment.

Married women, with children and a stake in the future of this country for their offspring vote differently. It’s their discernment.

 

[FeministVampireQueen]

The Dems are increasingly the party of single, childless, secular women

That has all the fingerprints of females acting without wisdom or discernment

Hardly... There is only a 9% difference between democrat men and women, and only a 12% difference between married people who vote in favor of the republicans versus democrats, and married women are almost even, 50% vote republican and 45% vote democratic. There's about an average of 10% difference in democrats having less children verses republicans. Y'all are making all of this into a far bigger deal than it actually is.

 

[Mojo]

Hardly... There is only a 9% difference between democrat men and women, and only a 12% difference between married people who vote in favor of the republicans versus democrats, and married women are almost even, 50% vote republican and 45% vote democratic. There's about an average of 10% difference in democrats having less children verses republicans. Y'all are making all of this into a far bigger deal than it actually is.

I’m not. I’ll look for the stats I saw regarding the historical trends. It’s not just party identification, it’s voter habits. Identification and voting aren’t synonymous.

On top of that, religious identification and practice is also a huge difference.

If I misremembered or can’t find the stats, I’ll revise my statement.

 

[HomesteadWife]

Hardly... There is only a 9% difference between democrat men and women, and only a 12% difference between married people who vote in favor of the republicans versus democrats, and married women are almost even, 50% vote republican and 45% vote democratic. There's about an average of 10% difference in democrats having less children verses republicans. Y'all are making all of this into a far bigger deal than it actually is.

When one percent of the current voting population is 1.54 million people than the percentages and numbers you quoted are millions of people. This is not some miniscule number to be concerned about.

 

[Mojo]

3. Partisanship by gender, sexual orientation, marital and parental status

Among registered voters, men continue to associate more with the Republican Party; sexual orientation is strongly linked to partisanship.

www.pewresearch.org

I’ll stand by my statement about Democrats attracting single women and the childless, as well as other groups, especially the sodomites.

Since never married, college educated women are increasing in number, the trends show that the Dems will likely be gearing their political policies more and more towards that demographic.

And like @HomesteadWife stated, 9 and 12% differences in an overall group that numbers in the millions is definitely a very significant statistical gap.

 

[FeministVampireQueen]

Right, so by y'alls math, that would represent around 8 million people? Which would also mean that around 50 million democrats have children, about 35 million are married, and between 30 and 35 million are actually men. I guess we're just supposed to just continue pretending the 8 million means something significant, while at the same time disregarding the tens of millions of who don't fit the stereotype of "childless, unmarried," "women," who "lack wisdom and discernment." Maybe it's just not as angsty and fun to say out loud the other way?