501 c(3) Deception

[NBTX11]

The meat is in the fine print. A 501 c(3) tax exempt church can not preach anything that goes against fundamental public policy. Therefore, they are compromising on the Word for financial gain.

This would explain why so many denominations that are under agreement with the government for tax exempt status - refuse to teach the truth on marriage and headship. Some may even be wolves in sheep’s clothing. Possibly high level freemasons:




View attachment 5873

This is hilarious. The hand symbol he is doing is known everywhere, especially among college football fans, as the university of Texas’ athletic hand symbol. Their mascot is the longhorns. There is absolutely no satanic intent in this hand symbol when used in this fashion.

 

[FollowingHim]

I believe if I am not mistaken, Biblical Families Ministries is a 501(c) 3

Biblical Family Ministries Inc - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica

Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as well as download tax filings going back as far as 2001.

projects.propublica.org

That's an entirely different organisation, and that is obvious to anyone who takes the smallest casual glance at the page you linked to. Firstly, it's got a different name (Family not Families). Secondly, the principal people involved are people we don't know about and entirely different to the ministry staff. Thirdly, it's in Pensylvania, while BF is based in Florida. And fourthly, the amount of money in their tax filings is well in excess of what could conceivably flow through this ministry given the number of people involved.

Why would the first time you mention this be to make a public false accusation against this ministry? Even if you genuinely believed this to be true the correct approach would be to ask key people in private for clarification first.

 

[Daniel DeLuca]

That's an entirely different organisation, and that is obvious to anyone who takes the smallest casual glance at the page you linked to. Firstly, it's got a different name (Family not Families). Secondly, the principal people involved are people we don't know about and entirely different to the ministry staff. Thirdly, it's in Pensylvania, while BF is based in Florida. And fourthly, the amount of money in their tax filings is well in excess of what could conceivably flow through this ministry given the number of people involved.

Why would the first time you mention this be to make a public false accusation against this ministry? Even if you genuinely believed this to be true the correct approach would be to ask key people in private for clarification first.

Fair enough. My bad.