Edit: Let me make this clear up front. 'Corporate law' and '501c(3) exemptions' are creations of men, not of YHVH. What is IMPORTANT is what He says, not what men say He should have said. Or what they say
instead. My original point was, is, and remains:
Who do we serve? If we understand that, we won't get deceived by what men try to do to circumvent His Instruction.
The implication of the question, as asked here, is "why not just start with what is MOST important?" Which, evidently, isn't His Word. Which makes it funny, what some find 'most compelling'.
@Mark C, if you'd simply quoted a paragraph from the actual legislation in reply to
@MemeFan this entire argument would never have happened. I cannot understand why you insist on writing so many emotive evidence-free assertions that you are right, rather than just quoting something to
show that you're right - which would have concisely dealt with both
@MemeFan and
@The Revolting Man simultaneously. This is a frequent issue.
Because I'm not your personal AI search tool assistant, Samuel! IF none of you can be bothered even to do a simple web search, why do you insist someone else to the tiny bit of real work you won't do yourself? Both you and Zec repeatedly brag about how you NEVER listen to anything I teach, or any shows I do. Am I required to WRITE it here, just so you don't have to study even a bit on your own?
The thread TITLE is (albeit, arguably wrong) about the IRS code, section 501, and a subpart, that the creator of those identified corporate entities chooses to call "non-profit". I saw pontification. And yet none of the pontificators bothered to read what they prattle so about?
The REAL answer is, because I presume (*** yeah - I know ***) that people here are at least a TINY bit familiar with the "Law 101 Basics" of what they are so vociferously trying to argue! Good grief. This is stuff I have talked about, TAUGHT about, done radio shows about, interviewed guests about, for over TWENTY YEARS. And written about here for at least half of that. Please humbly forgive me for thinking that you by now should have heard me talk about it a dozen times or more. Much less at least read the statute if you won't.
Do I have to "prove" that Biden is senile? Or that the election was rigged? Or that the Bible makes it ABUNDANTLY clear that you
"cannot serve two masters," or that idolatry is prohibited? Or that rebellion to Him, in SO many ways, brings curses? OOOPS --- THOSE things get censored and banned.
This is supposed to be BIBLICAL Families. We
start with Scripture. (And, as I contend, ALL fundamental US "Law" - the 'Law of the land" - comes DIRECTLY from Scripture!)
Can you at least ADMIT the problem????!!!!!!
PS> And, until this edit, note that I didn't even say "Whore Church." But - you all know I thought it!
