Looking for potential Sister Wives.

[theleastofthese]

The majority of women, single or married, work or obtain income in some way. Point me in the direction of how many men are able to completely financially support one woman, much less multiple with children. Most men have dreams and visions of "family businesses" and such, but very few times does this realistically happen profitably. Wouldn't it make more sense for women to put a career first right out of high school, even if they wanted a family? It's highly likely they will be employed the rest of their lives in some manner. An associate's degree only takes about 2 years of schooling, having one statistically means making more money than women without. A bachelor's degree can be obtained in 5 years and brings home about $40,000 more than women without. These women would be educated, have the ability to make money, and still only be in their lower 20s at the time of completion. Plenty of time for marriage and children. Except now instead of making minimum wage doing a job they hate while away from their children and families, they'd be able to work fewer hours for more pay with a career they've chosen. Essentially putting her career first is putting her family first.

Also, one of the "perks" often suggested to single women is that "they can have it all with plural marriage." Right??? They can have the husband, the children, and they can have the career. When did that narrative all of a sudden change? Do I need to search the forums and screenshot every time this is mentioned as a benefit. "Plural marriage is great for women because while you're at work, you can leave your children with a sister wife."

 

[Mark C]

An associate's degree only takes about 2 years of schooling, having one statistically means making more money than women without. A bachelor's degree can be obtained in 5 years and brings home about $40,000 more than women without.

How much fiat can she bring home? Are there other considerations?

How much Negative Edukashun does she have to get to be un-redeemable?

There was a time - not recently - when "higher education" arguably was. Now, for most fields of "study," (according to estimates some here won't like anyway) 90%+ of such "institutions" are nothing more than Woke Indoctrination.

I wouldn't pay to send children I cared about there. Why think they'll produce value in women differently from strangers?

I have no problem with real education. What most women now seem to get at most "universities" arguably makes them better suited to earn that fake currency on Only Fans.

 

[paterfamilias]

Tell me again why most women wouldn't obtain a career first? Being that the majority have to work these days, be it single, in a monogamous or plural marriage...

The first thing that occurs to me is if she is really focused on multiple children. Given the unfortunate moderately narrow window where woman are adult and husband high as it were and when one can no longer assume that pregnancy will be attainable, it seems like a good idea to knock out the kids between 18 to 30+/- and then do a career after the kids can do without mom supervising all the time.
Obviously the hypothetical women would need to A. feel comfortable that her guy is someone who will be committed for life and B. not being one of the woman who get bored or have changed their mind about what they want in life etc and ditch the marriage as is so common now.

 

[ASyers41]

The Secular Humanistic worldly education at a university will ruin a godly woman for a godly husband. She will be told all kinds of falsehoods about marriage including but not limited too toxic masculinity and how shes equal to a man and doesn’t need a man. News flash you aren’t equal to a man. You aren’t the head of the man he is the head of the woman. Also, Scripture is clear you do need a man you need a covering and the protection of a man.

 

[paterfamilias]

Also, one of the "perks" often suggested to single women is that "they can have it all with plural marriage." Right??? They can have the husband, the children, and they can have the career. When did that narrative all of a sudden change? Do I need to search the forums and screenshot every time this is mentioned as a benefit. "Plural marriage is great for women because while you're at work, you can leave your children with a sister wife."

I could be one of those who you are referring to in that I do believe that depending on the individual circumstances...like everything in life, woman very much can get the long end of the stick with plural marriage.
Each family will be different obviously but I can support multiple wives on my own. I am glad that my first wife works from home though. Partially for another good income but also because she is able to homeschool our son. When my second wife was still part of the family, the plan was for her to be a mom and homeschooler etc while slow rolling her education for a career later that would pay very well and give her a fair amount of freedom.
In point of fact that is still our goal in our search now, a woman who wants to put motherhood first but still pursue a valuable saleable skill for if/when it is needed or wanted.

It sounds like a fairly good deal to me frankly as I would vastly prefer to stay home with kids, family and doing homemaking that my job. In fact, scourge years ago or so a woman who was interested in our family had a very large passive income and was advocating for her just buying the ranch and home combo we envision and that I stay home to be a husband and father full time. Sounded like paradise. Did not work out unfortunately but the idea of being able to focus on those roles instead of making money was such a strange, revolutionary and mind boggling concept... hey ho.
Point being that my impression is that with as many families who are open to plural marriage and seeking a wife and how few woman are smart enough to get past the inculcation of serial monogamy...those woman, especially younger ones who want a bunch of kids...have massive opportunities and options.

 

[MemeFan]

Tell me again why most women wouldn't obtain a career first? Being that the majority have to work these days, be it single, in a monogamous or plural marriage...

Because family is more valuable and worth than career. Because people on deathbed never regret more time with family, but they regret time spent on career.

Yes, we need to provide for ourselves and career can be fullfiliing, but still family is special.

 

[frederick]

Point me in the direction of how many men are able to completely financially support one woman, much less multiple with children.

**Raises hand ** Please, Miss! I worked and fully supported my wife shortly after the wedding (She became pregnant within a few weeks and suffered serious morning sickness). She was a full-time wife, mother, and homemaker raising and home-educating our children. But then, we're not from the USA, so it's different for us.

 

[theleastofthese]

How much fiat can she bring home? Are there other considerations?

How much Negative Edukashun does she have to get to be un-redeemable?

There was a time - not recently - when "higher education" arguably was. Now, for most fields of "study," (according to estimates some here won't like anyway) 90%+ of such "institutions" are nothing more than Woke Indoctrination.

I wouldn't pay to send children I cared about there. Why think they'll produce value in women differently from strangers?

I have no problem with real education. What most women now seem to get at most "universities" arguably makes them better suited to earn that fake currency on Only Fans.

Studies show that on average women who attend college do not have more sexual partners than women who don't. By the way people have been whoring around throughout generations long before attending college. I can remember stories told to me both from and about the women in my own family doing similar things without ever having attended college and doing so via letters and photos instead of the internet. The same goes for the men. How many of our uncles, grandfathers and fathers stemming from your generation have slept with multiple women they never properly took care of? Perhaps college isn't the problem? Maybe the lack of christ-centered teachings are to blame or the moral issues that have been passed down throughout generations such as yours. Instead let's render women feral cats in heat, absolutely unable to control themselves in the presence of men in a school- setting Let's ignore that in all likelihood they're just trying to find means to survive above poverty level pay. Pay that your beloved red states so graciously provide.

 

[Mark C]

Studies show that on average women who attend college do not have more sexual partners than women who don't.

Which had nothing to do with the issue in my post.

The problem was fembots who emerge knowing less than nothing, but are nevertheless convinced they are God's Gift to - well, not men, in general...

I'd rather have a wife who knew nothing, but was 'teachable,' than a dumbed-down TDS-imbued Leftist who knows with certainty what's WRONG with everyone else (especially males) but is intent on ruling over any man silly enough to sleep with her.

 

[theleastofthese]

Yes, we need to provide for ourselves and career can be fullfiliing, but still family is special

I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing against the constant rhetoric that women "can't have both," when "women having both" is the very same argument the men on here make when encouraging women to consider plural marriage to begin with. Not only that, the majority of men NEED women to "have both" because the majority of them can't single-handedly financially support a family without the financial contributions of the very same women they're insulting for so called- putting their careers first. In most cases putting a career first would benefit a woman and her family whether she chooses to remain single or marry. Insisting the contrary is true is absolute buffoonery at this point

 

[MeganC]

The majority of women, single or married, work or obtain income in some way. Point me in the direction of how many men are able to completely financially support one woman, much less multiple with children. Most men have dreams and visions of "family businesses" and such, but very few times does this realistically happen profitably.

Plenty of men start and run their own businesses. Some are more successful than others. But this is the same even in regular jobs.

Wouldn't it make more sense for women to put a career first right out of high school, even if they wanted a family? It's highly likely they will be employed the rest of their lives in some manner.

Nope. It makes much more sense for a woman who wants to be a mother and wife to do so at an early age when she's most capable of birthing children and not at 40 or 50 when her best child bearing years are behind her. Jobs and careers can come later. Children can't.

An associate's degree only takes about 2 years of schooling, having one statistically means making more money than women without. A bachelor's degree can be obtained in 5 years and brings home about $40,000 more than women without. These women would be educated, have the ability to make money, and still only be in their lower 20s at the time of completion. Plenty of time for marriage and children. Except now instead of making minimum wage doing a job they hate while away from their children and families, they'd be able to work fewer hours for more pay with a career they've chosen. Essentially putting her career first is putting her family first.

Between my chickens, eggs, baking, and quilting I was making more money than most college graduates do after five years.

Then I added a pilot's license which required an FAA approved flight school and then my multi-engine rating and now I've more than doubled my annual income and I only fly one or two days a week. No college was included and no student loans.

Also, one of the "perks" often suggested to single women is that "they can have it all with plural marriage." Right??? They can have the husband, the children, and they can have the career. When did that narrative all of a sudden change? Do I need to search the forums and screenshot every time this is mentioned as a benefit. "Plural marriage is great for women because while you're at work, you can leave your children with a sister wife."

I would not recommend this life to someone who wants to be a career woman. But, I will say that I would not be able to fly for work if it weren't for the fact that there are other women at home to take care of my children when I'm away.

A plural coming into this life should expect to start out with family priorities well ahead of career priorities and if that doesn't work then maybe this life isn't for her.

 

[ASyers41]

Stats say that if a woman went to a Secular University she has a 90 percent chance of being divorced and also Monogamous marriage has a 70 percent chance of obtaining divorce. I believe you exchange God’s boundaries for bondages. You can’t have both not and fully be in submission to your husband and Christ. Your children will suffer with a mother not being home. The matter isn’t an education or work issue it’s a submission issue.

 

[theleastofthese]

Plenty of men start and run their own businesses. Some are more successful than others. But this is the same even in regular jobs.

Sure, some do but the majority need a woman's contribution financially. On this very forum men mention it all of the time.

Nope. It makes much more sense for a woman who wants to be a mother and wife to do so at an early age when she's most capable of birthing children and not at 40 or 50 when her best child bearing years are behind her. Jobs and careers can come later. Children can't.

She's going to lose time either way. Be it making less babies or leaving the ones she has for work.

Between my chickens, eggs, baking, and quilting I was making more money than most college graduates do after five years.

Then I added a pilot's license which required an FAA approved flight school and then my multi-engine rating and now I've more than doubled my annual income and I only fly one or two days a week. No college was included and no student loans.

I made more as a cocktail waitress at a casino than I would have with my associates. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the majority of women with an education make more income, especially with the requirements for employment these days.

I would not recommend this life to someone who wants to be a career woman. But, I will say that I would not be able to fly for work if it weren't for the fact that there are other women at home to take care of my children when I'm away.

A plural coming into this life should expect to start out with family priorities well ahead of career priorities and if that doesn't work then maybe this life isn't for her

I agree with this. What I'm saying is that there are times, where putting a career first benefits the family. There are many ways to put a family's needs first, sometimes providing more income is one of them. People are so quick to dismiss career women as selfish when in fact they can be a great benefit.

 

[theleastofthese]

Stats say that if a woman went to a Secular University she has a 90 percent chance of being divorced

Because she can support herself. It's a fear that men have, and it's the root of the issue. They lose control. Failing to see that all along women no matter their career or educational background will be less likely to divorce a man worth being loyal to. It's easier to harp on women and tell them they're the problem for not submitting or to convince them that society has taught them bad habits, than it is to lead by example and be the man that women who aren't mindless actually want to follow.

 

[MemeFan]

I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing against the constant rhetoric that women "can't have both," when "women having both" is the very same argument the men on here make when encouraging women to consider plural marriage to begin with. Not only that, the majority of men NEED women to "have both" because the majority of them can't single-handedly financially support a family without the financial contributions of the very same women they're insulting for so called- putting their careers first. In most cases putting a career first would benefit a woman and her family whether she chooses to remain single or marry. Insisting the contrary is true is absolute buffoonery at this point

It's very hard to have both.

And women and men, usually would prefer to spend fulltime on children rather than combine career and children.

I'm certain there are cases of career women decide to become "full-time mom" after giving birth, however there are no opposite cases.

Something is wrong with women if she avoids her own children.

 

[theleastofthese]

It's very hard to have both.

Then people need to stop mentioning that women can't have both while demanding that women do both...

 

[Mark C]

Then people need to stop mentioning that women can't have both while demanding that women do both...

If you'd quit watching CNN that wouldn't be such a big issue.

 

[theleastofthese]

If you'd quit watching CNN that wouldn't be such a big issue.

No one under the age of 50 watches CNN or any other news platform. We prefer to get our information from credible sources such as Tyler Durden.

 

[ASyers41]

Because she can support herself. It's a fear that men have, and it's the root of the issue. They lose control. Failing to see that all along women no matter their career or educational background will be less likely to divorce a man worth being loyal to. It's easier to harp on women and tell them they're the problem for not submitting or to convince them that society has taught them bad habits, than it is to lead by example and be the man that women who aren't mindless actually want to follow.

First off this is one hundred percent liberal feminism at its best. God never intended for the woman to support herself. This goes against Scripture. Hence where we are at in this country and culture in the US right now. This doesn’t mean I am mindless. My husband takes my thoughts into account but at the end of the day He makes the decision as the head of the household. Our society has taken away the man’s balls and put them in his woman’s purse. The reason why women are ruling is because we have a bunch of simp, effeminate men running around. I follow my husband’s lead even if I don’t agree with him because he’s the head. Do I have my moments of strong dislike in the way he is leading and guiding ? Yes but at the end of the day I follow because he’s is accountable to Jesus for his decisions.
This is where single women get all puffed up and prideful and want a man to acquiesce to their demands. I can politely give my thoughts but I ultimately bow to my husband because he is Ba’al my Master and King. He takes care of me in every way. I never have to worry about anything and it’s easier to submit when a Husband is righteous but I am still commanded to submit to his authority whether he is righteous or not. Ephesians 5 is not a suggestion on either side. It commands the man to love as Christ loves the Church and gave himself for it. Christ laid down his life and a husband is basically commanded to love his wife or wives enough to give his life for her which is not easy. Secondly, woman you are supposed to submit to your husband the same way you would submit to Christ being in the room.

 

[theleastofthese]

God never intended for the woman to support herself. This goes against Scripture

Actually it doesn't. Where in scripture are women told they can't be single or support themselves?

The reason why women are ruling is because we have a bunch of simp, effeminate men running around

Good. So blame the men, not the college educated women who want to make more than minimum wage.

. I follow my husband’s lead even if I don’t agree with him because he’s the head.

This is what most women will do, given the right man. That was my entire point.