There are myriad misunderstandings here. We've gone over this Ezekiel verse before in the context of a covenant and we showed it's a pretty limited event. God metaphorically had sex with this (woman which created a one flesh covenant. There is no further application to this covenant then to demonstrate once again that sex is a covenant that creates a one flesh situation. You have to stretch like hell to get it to say anything else ESPECIALLY as this is merely an aside in this passage on the way to the main point. Ezekiel is not talking or giving instructions on how to vow to your wife.
And a father can't negate a daughter's marriage vows, at least it's not all that cut and dried. Numbers 30 tells us that a father can negate the vows of either his wife or virgin daughter that are made to God. The father's ability to do this seems to be taken away after her virginity is lost. And as far as keeping the seduced daughter from her husband, that seems to only come in effect as an escape clause if the father refuses to allow physical custody to take place. There is nothing to imply that a father could retroactively nullify a marriage later on. That authority passes on to the husband. You risk tearing apart what God has joined together. And that's not to be done.
