Prophesying does have a foretelling and a forthtelling component. Prophets with a Big P are rarely coloring inside the lines and simply forthtelling what’s already been inspired and preserved by God in His Word.
Go and ask him what he means, man. Don’t take my word for it. Go and see for yourself. I’ve done my homework. If you don’t like where I landed and the answers I came up with, by all means Brother; be a Berean, do the hard work and the heart work for yourself on this one.
He’s an apostate and a heretic and a terrible mascot for any sort of orthodox pro-polygyny movement.
I am not qualified to arbitrate orthodoxy, but your accusations are pretty deep. Specifically apostate, and heretic.The man calls himself a Prophet. His women are absolutely being placed in positions of authority by the mere virtue of their speech. Feel free to look more deeply into the details of their congregation.
The prohibition against teaching is separate and extends beyond the boundaries of the four walls of a building. Older women can teach other women what’s listed in Titus 2.
We make these things so complicated and they’re really not. Silence means silence.
I’d like to see some citations on your homework about this guy. Point me in the right direction.
Isaiah 43:26 confronts these kinds of broad condemnations: "Put me in remembrance: let us plead together: declare thou, that thou mare ayest be justified." God says to layout the facts, not assert from a distance.
What specifically are the women saying or doing?
Prophecy in the gathered assembly? Leadership over men? It matters! They carry different weight under 1 Tim 2:12 vs. 1 Cor 14:34–35 vs. Acts 21:9 (Philip's four daughters prophesied).
Do you have citations of him claiming to be a "Prophet" with a capital P? claiming new revelation?. Help me out with a video and timestamp.
Cor 14:34 uses sigatosan (to keep silent), and Paul himself commends women praying and even prophesying in 1 Cor 11:5, This in the same letter!. If silence actualy means absolute silence, those two passages contradict one and other. How do we reconcile them? It’s not as simple as you claim).
You are telling others "be a Berean, do the hard work." I definitely agree. Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans because they thoroughly examine claims through the lense of Scripture. They didn't just accept an assertion that something was heretical. They checked whether the things were so. We can check your claims against scripture, and if the claims turn out to be true then he is what you say. The probem is claims are claims, whats the cause of the claims? Evidence must be presented and facts established.
Again, please cite the antithetical message. Show evidence of the doctrinal error. Point to what he taught or is teaching that contradicts Scripture. Absent of that, Proverbs 18:17 says "He that is first of his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him." Your case seems just until someone searches it.
I'm not defending this guy at all. I am just asking for the evidence before agreeing with your verdict.
Your claims can be settled and established as fact with simple citation of evidence.