Steve, must you always reduce everything to it’s crudest terms?Before the guys get into “the beast with two backs”, I will say that I think it simply means that the woman joins the man and becomes one with his purposes, his life, his goals.
They are no longer two separate people.
I see... but in what you've said, where is God involved in the joining?Before the guys get into “the beast with two backs”, I will say that I think it simply means that the woman joins the man and becomes one with his purposes, his life, his goals.
They are no longer two separate people.
That’s interesting, and distressing.Steve, must you always reduce everything to it’s crudest terms?
I’m joking Steve, it’s a movie quote.That’s interesting, and distressing.
A quick search will show that the phrase has been used more than a half dozen times in these forums. And not by me.
I don’t agree with it and know that it will be stated, so I wanted to do an end-run around it.
And I’m the one with the thread about cleaning up the language a bit.
Ain’t that somethin.
And I’m as gullible as everI’m joking Steve, it’s a movie quote.
At the sex.I see... but in what you've said, where is God involved in the joining?
So at sex do you believe that God has fused them together spiritually, or that He simply acknowledges them as one whole?At the sex.
You're right the implication seems deeper. It reminds me of the language of Psalm 139:13 and Job 10:11 although I am not sure that's apples to apples.I guess with Jesus' words what I am also pondering deeper down, is if God is more involved in marriage than we think. Is He personally joining each woman to her husband in marriage? Based off of Christ's words divorce shouldn't be a thing because then we are separating what God Himself has "joined" together. It really is a profound statement. Is that not an implication that God has personally joined those that are in marriage?
Bro, exactly! I was actually going to write the parallels between God's involvement with people hand fashioning and knitting them in the womb, and seemingly personally joining, or you could say knitting man and woman together. There seems to be a pattern here to me as well. There are scriptural implications that He is more involved than we think. We're on the exact same page with this one.You're right the implication seems deeper. It reminds me of the language of Psalm 139:13 and Job 10:11 although I am not sure that's apples to apples.
We know something of the biological implications of sex, but this seems larger.
For anyone new that didn't see this thread.We know something of the biological implications of sex, but this seems larger.
Yes.So at sex do you believe that God has fused them together spiritually, or that He simply acknowledges them as one whole?
Physically, not spiritually. 1 Corinthians 6:16-17 contrasts the two:So at sex do you believe that God has fused them together spiritually, or that He simply acknowledges them as one whole?
It's physical and when things are functioning properly, produces new little humans known as infants. Somehow God is sovereign and involved in all of it.Physically, not spiritually. 1 Corinthians 6:16-17 contrasts the two:
"What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit."
One flesh/body, and one spirit, are two entirely separate but parallel things. We become one body with our wives, and one spirit with our Lord.
Most confusion around marriage is caused by over-spiritualising it. That's why people think that a couple who are living together but haven't had a wedding aren't "married" but only "cohabitating" - because they think marriage is something spiritual that you only get when you are blessed by a priest or whatever. It's not spiritual. It's physical - one flesh, NOT one spirit. The word "flesh" very much means exactly what it says - it's the same word used for meat that you eat. One physical flesh.
Don't look for a spiritual explanation. The word is explicitly physical.
So at sex do you believe that God has fused them together spiritually, or that He simply acknowledges them as one whole?
Not so much a response to @MeganC but rather to everybody who thinks "one flesh" is spiritual, I'd like to suggest looking at the bolded phrase from a Socratic perspective: Define your terms.Sex, when done right, can join men and women together spiritually.