Name-calling is Biblical

[Phillip]

Without love people are nothing. I am teaching about perfect love which also the scripture teaches that we need to have in order to abide in Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the true vine and we need to abide in him by walking as he walked according to moral choices. The one who does not abide in him is a person who practice and commit sin.

This part of your comment was good. The last sentence? I would suggest that someone who does not abide in Christ is lost, but whether that person practices or commits sin would be on an individual basis. But their sin nature would continue without Christ.

I have to tell you, these last two posts are so much easier to read. You haven’t been as harsh and they seem more genuine.

I think I should share this with you. When I was 14 years old, an evangelist came to our church. Under his preaching, I was convicted of my sins and I asked God for forgiveness and asked Jesus to come into my life. Jesus was faithful and I’ve never regretted doing that. I say that because of your questions. Keep in mind, that was just a short way to tell you.

When you first came on here, you spoke of your family situation. Without discussing all the details, how is Johan doing on the inside? Are you doing OK? Not your ministry. You.

 

[Johan Paulsson]

Apparently Ray is not Calvinist.

How so? Whom do you call a Calvinist? When do you call a person a Calvinist?
What must a person believe in order for you to call/label/see him/her as a Calvinist?

For me, if a person is using the law in order to ''prove'' that you can not keep the law perfectly that is enough in order for me to call a person a Calvinist/Lutheran.

Ray Comfort does teach Calvinism, according to my view of Calvinism.

What is Calvinism for you? There are different sorts of Calvinists?

There may be doctrines that makes him different from other Calvinists, but yet he is using things from Calvinism that he does stand for and behind.

 

[Pacman]

For me, if a person is using the law in order to ''prove'' that you can not keep the law perfectly that is enough in order for me to call a person a Calvinist/Lutheran.

I’m confused. What’s wrong with using the law for evangelism? It’s how we know what sin is...

Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law:

 

[Verifyveritas76]

How so? Whom do you call a Calvinist? When do you call a person a Calvinist?
What must a person believe in order for you to call/label/see him/her as a Calvinist?

For me, if a person is using the law in order to ''prove'' that you can not keep the law perfectly that is enough in order for me to call a person a Calvinist/Lutheran.

Ray Comfort does teach Calvinism, according to my view of Calvinism.

What is Calvinism for you? There are different sorts of Calvinists?

There may be doctrines that makes him different from other Calvinists, but yet he is using things from Calvinism that he does stand for and behind.

He specifically does not define or consider himself a Calvinist. For you to continue to define him that way is either ignorant of that fact or slander.

Now you have no excuse for ignorance. Continued slander will not be accepted.

 

[Johan Paulsson]

I’m confused. What’s wrong with using the law for evangelism? It’s how we know what sin is...

Romans 7:7
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law:

The problem with your doctrines is that you are inconsistent with the scripture about righteousness and salvation.

I am not against using the law of THE LORD in Evangelism. I am using the law of THE LORD and the commandments of THE LORD in Evangelism. I am not afraid of using the la of THE LORD in Evangelism.

What is the problem is when/if you are using the law of THE LORD and the commandments of THE LORD, and then telling people that it is impossible to be morally perfect, that it is impossible to keep the law and the commandments of THE LORD perfectly and blameless.

I teach that people can and must be morally perfect and sinless in this life. The scripture is not saying that salvation can be obtained while being sinful and unrighteous in words, thoughts and actions.

I can quote many scriptures that proves and shows that keeping the law of THE LORD and the commandments of THE LORD perfectly is possible in this life. There are many examples of Believing men and women who kept the commandments of THE LORD blameless. Do you deny and reject this? Yes or no?

 

[Pacman]

I teach that people can and must be morally perfect and sinless in this life. The scripture is not saying that salvation can be obtained while being sinful and unrighteous in words, thoughts and actions.

I can quote many scriptures that proves and shows that keeping the law of THE LORD and the commandments of THE LORD perfectly is possible in this life. There are many examples of Believing men and women who kept the commandments of THE LORD blameless. Do you deny and reject this? Yes or no?

Back up your claims please.

 

[Phillip]

Back up your claims please.

Pacman, you’re fine. There’s an old saying ‘Take it with a grain of salt’. In Johans case, get a case of salt, you’re gonna need it.

Johan, you did so good in your last two texts, then you go and dump on someone for no reason. Strange bit of coincidence, I just talked to Pacman this week and he’s a really good brother. I enjoyed talking to him.

You named this thread “Name Calling is Biblical”. I don’t know if you’re a mind reader or not, but if you were you might notice all the names on my mind I am not calling you. I guess I could by the verse in ‘Johan 3:6’ whereby you claim to use the commandments. And yet, you simply do use any commandments to back your claim.

In ‘Johan 3:3’ or was it Johan 3:4’? You claimed to love people by hating them. Or was it you hate people by living them. I have trouble remembering how you twist the immortal words in the sacred gospel according to ‘Johan’.

I would like to correct something you said. ‘ you said, “I quote many scriptures”. This quote would be better said as “I MISQUOTE many scriptures”. Somewhere in the gospel according to ‘Johan’ you wrote how you treat people, talk to people and in general react to people because of love. Is there any possible way you could refrain from loving people on this site as much as you do? In fact, there are studies of that type of sadistic love you show. If you could turn that love of yours down (a lot) it would be quite appreciated.

Back in your court.

 

[Asforme&myhouse]

I teach that people can and must be morally perfect and sinless in this life. The scripture is not saying that salvation can be obtained while being sinful and unrighteous in words, thoughts and actions.

If that ain’t the Pelagian heresy, I don’t know what is.

Oh foolish Johan, who has bewitched you?

A gospel of salvation by works of the law is NO GOSPEL AT ALL!

 

[steve]

Seriously folks, Johan lives to be rejected. It is what makes him feel morally superior.
He has no intention of learning a single thing. He just wants his I was rejected by Biblical Families merit badge to add to his stack, as proof of his righteousness.

Prove me wrong, Johan. Become a friend to those who are a part of the same body that you are of.