It was a complement about the commentary.The thing I quoted was in here...
It was a complement about the commentary.The thing I quoted was in here...
If two consenting adults agree to a proposition, a service for financial reward, why does anyone else need to be involved? The government has no right to step in between them, whether it is a marriage or brief physical interaction. Biblically it may be an unwise exchange, and that includes an unwise marrage, but that doesn't mean the government should become involved. People are too quick to throw away their freedoms and want government intervention.
My friend and I recently got into a discussion about prostitution. He holds the stance that it should be legalized, even admitting that he would most likely partake in using one.
I like how you phrased this.
I have said in the past that I wasn't far off from the mark of being a prostitute. I was IMHO a definite concubine.
I wanted a safe home, I wanted to be cared for, and I gave my husband my body in return.
And a lot of other women do the same thing but they call themselves something more acceptable like gold diggers or trophy wives.
It doesn't matter if you have one customer or 100 customers, if you're trading yourself for gain then you know what you are.
II would rather have a wife.
historical precedents
marriage as old fashioned, ancient
Commitment and responsibility are essential pillars to protecting individual dignity because it ultimately means respecting and supporting the boundaries and goals of another human being.
I prefer the harder path of seeking meaning and longevity in those I care about and invest in.