Why is Darwin wrong? He says that gradual evolution will create new species. This implies that changes in genetic code are good. Horewer, according to theory of information any accidental change (white noise) of code (think grammar of any communication type) will destroy information (make message worse). Since genetic code is code this means that theory of information applies to it. Therefore any accidental change in genetic code will make it worse.
Digging into Darwin's observations evolution isn't about individuals adapting to change it's about
populations adapting to change.
For instance, in humanity today we see darker skinned people along the equator and lighter skinned people in the more Arctic regions. Lighter skinned people do better at creating their own vitamin D when there's less sunlight and darker skinned people are less prone to sunburn and skin cancer in the brightest sunlight.
As humans migrated to these areas the individuals who were not already adapted to prosper in these areas did not prosper. But their lighter/darker skinned compatriots did. Eventually the populations in those areas were all light or dark.
As mutations occur in genetic code most of the mutations filter out of a population because they're not well suited to the environment at hand. But some mutations will be better suited and the progeny of those individuals who have those mutations will outcompete their peers who do not have what is now a genetic advantage.
In the modern time I would say that a belief in God and Jesus is an evolutionary advantage.
Why?
Because Christians have more kids than atheists do. And all these mentally ill people who get medically and surgically sterilized in the name of 'transgenderism' are not going to have children. Homosexuals will not have children.
In due time these deviants will cease to exist as a population simply because they do not reproduce.
Christian faith is then a demonstrable evolutionary advantage over the soulless and empty philosophies of the left.
Now is it a genetic thing that some people are better at faith than others? I don't know but it would not surprise me if that's the case.
In any case genetics are like a constant game of roulette in which variations are tossed out and just like in roulette most of the time when you play you lose. But sometimes when you win you can win big.
The odds of winning are far less than the odds of winning but the genius in the design is that it is
inevitable that there will be winners.
To me the tool of evolution and genetic adaptation indicates the hand of a designer because while mutations are random the outcomes of mutations are not. The system is designed so that only advantageous mutations become dominant.
Which is why when I see natural systems like this that do not create chaos (which would follow the notion of entropy) then I see the Hand of God at work.
Further, I no more pretend to know all there is about evolution than I pretend to know everything about life. I am simply saying that I do not see any conflict in acknowledging observable natural phenomena and my faith. Because every time I dig deep into these various phenomena I see God at work. I see an intelligent designer at work who is consciously fighting back chaos and darkness to bring order and light.
