-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
Unmarried, or unlicensed?
Unlicensed, but most of those living as a married couple without a bit of paper do not consider themselves in a marriage relationship with the commitment that it truly involves.
Which is even more sad.
Amen!
Yes, unlicensed and uncommitted, and also ungodly. The number of people in NZ identifying as atheists is growing so those newborns have a grim future with their unlicensed and uncommitted parents.
Consequences remain to be seen. There is possibility this is actually good.
I'm certain women would like to be married more than men. Yet, they are staying in relationships and having children with men who refuse to be married. Therefore, such women are obeying their men's wishes.
Today's standard marriage is very feminine institution. Dying instituon also.
So patriarchy is back, just in different form.
That actually made me laugh! So funny that the people who hate patriarchy have managed to create an even worse version of it!
No tax break for traditional church in America:
nitter.it
Kambree (@KamVTV)
I got confused over the same sex marriage bill. I thought it was already legal. My cousin is gay and he got married years ago, so I looked into the bill. Ahhh, it will allow the IRS, to revoke the tax-exempt status of churches that hold fast to traditional marriage...
nitter.it
"I got confused over the same sex marriage bill. I thought it was already legal. My cousin is gay and he got married years ago, so I looked into the bill. Ahhh, it will allow the IRS, to revoke the tax-exempt status of churches that hold fast to traditional marriage."
They serve "another master" - the one who "created" the so-called church, by issuing its corporate charter. They have their reward. No surprise, they were certainly warned.
Uh-huh. And what about mosques?
Some servants of the Adversary are more equal than others...
Report one and find out what happens.
Edit: Seriously, that may be a good method to fight back against such laws. I obviously don't actually want Muslims getting in trouble for believing the truth about marriage. But neither does the governemnt. So if they introduce a law and instantly it becomes apparent that it is "discriminatory against Muslims", then the law may be deemed flawed and repealed.
Find special protected class harmed by law and start campaign. With little luck NYT will endorse you.
Censorship technology upgrade:
nitter.it
Foundation For Freedom Online (@FFO_Freedom)
9. Here, the US government's private sector deputy explains how they are moving from a reactive censorship model reliant on "fact-checking" and "debunking" to proactive censorship model built on "cognitive vaccination" and "prebunking." This is the science of censorship:
nitter.it
The Italian Prime Minister is awesome:
Wow, awesome indeed.
From what I've seen most 16 and 17 year olds around the world have better cognitive skills than the current president of the USA. And if he got a second term....
