I don’t know if he a warrant, there had been complaints of chickens going over the fence.What? Why? Did he have a warrant?
We are in a subdivision out in the country, a farmers pasture beyond the back fence. We only have a lot, no acreage.
I don’t know if he a warrant, there had been complaints of chickens going over the fence.What? Why? Did he have a warrant?
Clip one of the wings.there had been complaints of chickens going over the fence.
Our chickens suddenly shut off about 4 weeks ago.Anyone else noticing this with their chickens?
Anyone else noticing this with their chickens?
Chart of where Bible references itself:
The chart must be a good start but is not complete, as nothing refers to Judges, but Samson and others are discussed in Hebrews. So there are references that are missed off the chart. What list of references is used? How was the chart derived?Chart of where Bible references itself:
Can't draw that conclusion without knowing how the chart was made. There's a good chance it was only made using NT references to the OT, so those connections don't exist simply because they were never intended to be there.Interesting. Lots of the New Testament connects back to the Old Testament.
BUT:
- Hardly any of the OT connects to other parts of the OT
- Hardly any or None of the NT connects to other parts of the NT
What would be very interesting would be the same chart expanded to include the full apocrypha - both those books considered canonical by some branches of Christianity and the other major books like Enoch. Then such a comparison could be made.Not to be speaking heresy, but something interesting occurred to me. You could use this to validate various books in the old testament.
For example, if a book was put in at a later date, or is now incorrectly assumed to be part of the OT, it should have no or few references from the new.
Essentially, it's a way to verify what was in the OT at the time of the NT. Anything not referenced should, perhaps, be taken more lightly and books with greater "link" volume taken more seriously as they were known to exist at the time.
This could also work for verifying specific pieces, not just whole books.
...would love to know the age of the OT and NT being used and see this project run out far enough that you could zoom in and see what specifically quotes to what. ...now I have the itch to code this.
Smart people have figured how to jailbreak ChatGPT:
I don't know how chart is derived. I have shared everything I know about it.The chart must be a good start but is not complete, as nothing refers to Judges, but Samson and others are discussed in Hebrews. So there are references that are missed off the chart. What list of references is used? How was the chart derived?
This is incredible!Smart people have figured how to jailbreak ChatGPT:
What would be very interesting would be the same chart expanded to include the full apocrypha - both those books considered canonical by some branches of Christianity and the other major books like Enoch. Then such a comparison could be made.
I mention Enoch because it is directly referenced in scripture. For example, Jude 1:14-15 is a quotation of Enoch 1:9.Very interesting thought! I think the issue would be finding a sufficiently clean text, particularly already online so you don't have the input issue. By clean I mean if a version of the bible didn't include Enoch then any references that previously existed would have been stripped.