Half of what you listed weren't actually even 'theories.'
And, to be correct, since you claim to want to be, if something is "proven," it is no longer a theory: It is called a "Law".
Like the "Law of Gravity." Or "Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics."
And, no, Bohr's model of the atom (once "indivisible," by definition) hasn't even been 'proven.'
F=MA hasn't even been "proven". It just works almost all the time, in 'non-relativistic frames of reference.'
Furthermore, the Aether, once DISPROVEN, is back in favor again.
And, to be correct, since you claim to want to be, if something is "proven," it is no longer a theory: It is called a "Law".
Like the "Law of Gravity." Or "Newton's Second Law of Thermodynamics."
And, no, Bohr's model of the atom (once "indivisible," by definition) hasn't even been 'proven.'
F=MA hasn't even been "proven". It just works almost all the time, in 'non-relativistic frames of reference.'
Furthermore, the Aether, once DISPROVEN, is back in favor again.