• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Marrying non-believers versus young believers

That is very similar to @rockfox's statement that it is more important to find a submissive wife who will follow your leadership, than one who nominally claims to be Christian but is fundamentally worldly. Which shows it's a pragmatic, logical position that others have come to also - whether or not it agrees with scripture being a different matter, I just find the parallels interesting.

I think that ultimately yes, marry a Christian woman. But my second statement is a reflection of the practical realities involved and how you get there. Honestly, there are probably greater numbers of submissive women outside the church than in (raw numbers, I'm not sure yet about the proportions).

That and the best Christian women are likely the ones to be hardest to convince (or their fathers) to embrace polygamy.
 
I did not say it's not expressly forbidden. I believe it is forbidden for Christians as @frederick has outlined - this is a later instruction, so it does not contradict the fact that Israelites could marry captured women. Nor is it incompatible with the idea of marrying captured women - if they converted during the 30-day courting period. And it's particularly important to follow in Western culture, while it was less of a concern in ancient Israel hence the lack of a prohibition in Torah.

In the Qur'an, this issue is grappled with because Islam is fundamentally militant and quite keen on the idea of capturing wives... Their policy is that a Muslim man can marry any Muslim, Christian or Jew, but not a pagan, and there is an expectation that if they marry a Christian or a Jew she will ultimately convert to Islam. I am not in any way promoting this theology as correct! But it is an interesting practical application of these basic principles. In other words, taking a historical cultural perspective, I take this to mean that a Muslim's wife must have a basic foundation of common religious belief to him (monotheism, patriarchy etc), and that is sufficient for starters, with the expectation that she will follow his headship ultimately. That is very similar to @rockfox's statement that it is more important to find a submissive wife who will follow your leadership, than one who nominally claims to be Christian but is fundamentally worldly. Which shows it's a pragmatic, logical position that others have come to also - whether or not it agrees with scripture being a different matter, I just find the parallels interesting.

Understood and I apologize if I misrepresented your statement. I personally don’t view it as expressly forbidden...
 
Honestly, there are probably greater numbers of submissive women outside the church than in (raw numbers, I'm not sure yet about the proportions).
Reminds me of the last talk I gave to my university Christian club, at a male-dominated agricultural university - I encouraged all the men to get out and evangelise the first year students if they wanted to leave university with a wife.
 
But I've recently decided it was probably happenstance timing with the end of the honeymoon period.
Transitioning out of the honeymoon period and converting around the same time must have been a big change all at once for you guys.

I may have teased her about poly in the mean time. :rolleyes:

Ha. I did the same with mine.
When she had a more chaotic than usual day I would offer to help by getting her a sister-wife. :D (All in good fun)

@rockfox Thank you for sharing.
 
Back
Top