• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Let's make some pro PATRIARCHY memes!!

FollowingHim said:
And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's,
But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.

Evidently, it is in some way possible to leave a wife for the sake of the gospel. I am not speculating as to what "left" means in this case, that's a can of worms, and certainly not suggesting we do it, but this simply shows us the Gospel is more important than your marriage. So, if marriage was placed more important than the Gospel, it would be an idol. It is therefore possible for your marriage to be an idol, in certain circumstances, according to Jesus.

Did I change your mind? :)
Click to expand...
Hard disagree.

Gospel is just happy news. Other people can find it from other sources.

It's only Jesus before husband, not gospel.
 
paterfamilias said:
Based meme?
Click to expand...
This is right place because both husband and wife get something.

I suspect there would be 5 likes on picture if text "White Polygamy" was missing. I consider this important since blacks are usually biggest polygyny supporters. Unless polygyny becomes part of white's culture, it will always stay in shadows.
 
Daniel DeLuca said:
Sounds good, but we are forgetting the negatives. Can the positives outweigh those negatives. The women here who are sister wives can shed light on that a bit.
Click to expand...
What negatives exactly?

Women in polygyny do get female company. Why us that bad per se?
 
MemeFan said:
What negatives exactly?

Women in polygyny do get female company. Why us that bad per se?
Click to expand...
If people were perfect, that would always be a positive.
Not every woman wants another woman to share her husband, home, and almost everything she owns except for, hopefully, her underwear.

The reason that some of us didn’t put a like on it is because the picture is very off-putting and it assumes too much.
 
steve said:
If people were perfect, that would always be a positive.
Not every woman wants another woman to share her husband, home, and almost everything she owns except for, hopefully, her underwear.

The reason that some of us didn’t put a like on it is because the picture is very off-putting and it assumes too much.
Click to expand...
If woman gets nothing from polygyny, they would she accept it? Nobody likes activities with zero benefits and many costs. Especially permament.

Since polygyny is something historically accepted, it was only because it was good for women themselves. Otherwise, they would gaslight and manipulate men into monogamy only.
 
MemeFan said:
If woman gets nothing from polygyny, they would she accept it? Nobody likes activities with zero benefits and many costs. Especially permament.

Since polygyny is something historically accepted, it was only because it was good for women themselves. Otherwise, they would gaslight and manipulate men into monogamy only.
Click to expand...
Are you actually serious?
 
MemeFan said:
I sense my offend/rude threshold is at least magnitude higher than your and good part of forum.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it kinda needs to be if you are going to be spouting those kind of assumptions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top