Well, I'd assert that Exodus 22:16-17 doesn't in any way firmly assert that fathers have the absolute right to arrange their daughters' marriages. The closest one can come to making that passage a mandate is to say that it implies that that kind of absolute power might be inferred. But that's still just an implication combined with an inference. [And don't fail to note that the passage is immediately followed by a more adamant demand that enchantresses are to be executed, which, if it were to be enforced today would dissuade a great many daughters from being provocative in pursuit of their own choice of husband.)Thank you, Nick. Scriptural, please.
For instance, Exodus 22:16-17 seems to demonstrate it's up to the father, purely. Some may dismiss it because extraordinary circumstances are in play.
However, I don't doubt that this collective group could parse through the entirety of Scripture and come up with a very firm joint conclusion that Scripture considers arranged marriages not only entirely acceptable practice but perhaps fully enforceable or even fully required. My personal general hunch is that arranged marriages have the blessing of His Word.
If, though, @NVIII, you consider current legal restrictions, sociological input or even anthropological dynamics to be of no concern to your OP, why then haven't you already declared this discussion to be finished and asked for it to be closed? What is it you're waiting for?
My question is somewhat rhetorical, because unless one were to have been seeking spiritual justification for enforcing arranged marriage on one's daughter no matter what anything but Scripture has to say in the matter, I'm now a bit befuddled about what the purpose of this thread is.
I would venture to say that I've experienced the same type of befuddlement when reading a great many other biblicalfamilies.org threads in which the OP or other participants demand that anything beyond Scripture is verboten as far as having any weight in the discussion. Such threads come across to me as fundamentalism designed to foster hostile argumentativeness, the only net effect of which is to promote doctrinal division -- and, just like the Hebrew Roots folks have what I call their own private playground which is also considered by some of them to be a ghetto, I sometimes wonder why we don't have another playground/ghetto that's labeled something like Ancient Scriptura Sola? That way, those of us who don't want to be spanked for having the temerity to think that advanced wisdom wasn't curtailed after 100 A.D. would know to avoid such threads.
The absence of such a roped-off area, though, will mean that I'll still probably always feel free to weigh in.
What am I missing? Where have I gone off the tracks?