Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
If he is doesn't care for social/political etc causes and wives take care of children/house he will have enough time for 12 wives. He can be with each wife every three days for 4 hours.
I know men are physically capable of a lot, but that scenario sure sounds like the man’s “job” would become just having sex with his wives.
What if the first wife is accustomed to having sex everyday? To keep up that pace with 12 wives and not reduce time spent with the wives that came into the marriage first would equal a lot of time in the sack!
I know men are physically capable of a lot, but that scenario sure sounds like the man’s “job” would become just having sex with his wives.
What if the first wife is accustomed to having sex everyday? To keep up that pace with 12 wives and not reduce time spent with the wives that came into the marriage first would equal a lot of time in the sack!
Adding a woman to your family is like adding an exponential variable because the prior state of your first or preceding wives will also change as you introduce the new variable.
So where x is a man and y is a woman then X+Y=Z where Z is an expression of the variables that can occur with a couple.
80%-90% time with children can women do themself. They can even help each other. Man is needed for moral instruction.
I don't believe children are key constraint.
Trained manager should be able to handle 7 grown people in areas of motivation, organization and similar. Today basic competence is this area is going to introduction to management course.
This leaves sex. Well, ...., there are courses in this area too. And with 7 wives there will be enough opportunities to practice. Remaining part (like leadership) what makes man attractive should come naturally since man is born with instructually knowing what do.*
Key constraint is time it takes to provide for family. And that is key issue.
*Today's society shamed men, so it's often doesn't come easily. But it is there.
Why is that important? No, I won't answer your prove your credibility question. My article is pure logical argumentation. What matter did I conclude correctly, not what feeling you have after reading my text.
Point is that true limit is higher that most people believe.
We may have to go back and look at this but “whoring” in these verses probably isn’t referring to strictly prostitution but rather broad sexual promiscuity that would include prostitution.
Why is that important? No, I won't answer your prove your credibility question. My article is pure logical argumentation. What matter did I conclude correctly, not what feeling you have after reading my text.
Point is that true limit is higher that most people believe.
We may have to go back and look at this but “whoring” in these verses probably isn’t referring to strictly prostitution but rather broad sexual promiscuity that would include prostitution.
True. The young woman who was discovered to not be a virgin on her wedding night was said to have “played the whore in her father’s house”. Obviously it’s not the exchange of money for services that is relevant to make one a whore, it’s the services themselves that are the whoredoms... and on the flip side that would also make the one who receives those services a whore munger.
Why is that important? No, I won't answer your prove your credibility question. My article is pure logical argumentation. What matter did I conclude correctly, not what feeling you have after reading my text.
Point is that true limit is higher that most people believe.
Purely logical to who? Anyway no one is forcing you to answer, I would just lean more towards your argument if you actually had 7 wives thus my question.
But what someone believes IS logical depends greatly on their perspective. And their perspective is influenced by every factor they have accepted AS factual and built into the paradigm. So before someone accepts your logical view you often must explain quite a bit.
Just look at Bible studies. Even working from the (suposedly) same text that all believers affirm there is much discussion, lots of it relating to how much weight one passage or factor should have on another.
But what someone believes IS logical depends greatly on their perspective. And their perspective is influenced by every factor they have accepted AS factual and built into the paradigm. So before someone accepts your logical view you often must explain quite a bit.
Just look at Bible studies. Even working from the (suposedly) same text that all believers affirm there is much discussion, lots of it relating to how much weight one passage or factor should have on another.
All I want is that you judge my posts here by rules of logic. And only thing which matters is are my conclusion(s) and premises true. Yes or no? Just black and white, no other color.
If you disagree then we can have debate in effort to find truth. This I want.
Yes, people aren't complety logical. Emotions play role. But emotions can't tell us is something true or not. Only logic.
Second my argument is about something possible, not something probable. Anybody here can earn 10X than now. This forum isn't visited by billionares and since anybody can become billionaire it is possible. Probable? Hell no.
To check my claims all is needed is to find out what family offices are, get idea how they work and can somebody earn enough to live of them. Rest is checking math does man have enough money for family and time for servicing wives.
Time argument I have allready done. Now for money. With 1.2 billion in assets and 1% of return taken for living costs and rest invested this leaves 12 million for living costs. With 12 wives it leaves nice 1 million for each wife and her kids. That better than average lifestyle in USA and fabuluos everywhere else.
Are today living people 1.2 B rich? Yes. Is my argument possible? Yes. It is probable? Hell no.
Do you understand know why I don't want to answer how much wives I have? It doesn't matter for argument. In fact, it would be distraction.
Math and logic are enough to check is vision/goal/dream/possibilites achievable. And somebody needs to be first example, to go into unknown. I'm not that example. But if somebody isn't willing to check what boundaries truly are then best we can do is get to same level as our ancestors and no step further.
