Interestingly enough, I was reading an article online about the Myth of the Robber Baron's. The author, Burt Folsom, brings up the fact that the Homesteading Act hurt the farmers, because it lead to more people producing the same resources. I recall how the Little House series talks first about Charles Ingalls getting a homestead, and later about Almonzo Wilder doing the same. It worked out well for Charles, Laura's father, because he had a trade, and was able to work for the railroad, whereas, the Wilders struggled mightily with crop failures, and more debt. The "Happy Golden Years" book, portrays this in a positive light, because Laura didn't want to be a farmer's wife, so failure, meant that she was ultimately able to do what she really wanted, namely teaching. That wiki article reveals the sad reality, that their only child they were able to rear to adulthood, was never able to have any children of her own.Some years ago when we were young Christians and first turning away from equality towards patriarchy @Foxlily read the Little House books and was struck by how feminist they were; the works were shot through with it. She missed noticing radical individualism woven through it though. Homesteading was very much a community, not individualistic, endeavor.
I found it interesting how well Rose's life follows what we've now come to recognize as the feminist life playbook. And if you know what to look for, you can see marks of the deep state too.