C
Cap
Guest
I personally love the 10 Suggestions...
It seems that the Son of God came to correct the 10 Interpretations .
I personally love the 10 Suggestions...
Interesting prospective, the New Covenant is a "do over".
Kinda makes the statement, "it is finished" pointless, but that's just me.
(You knew I couldn't resist)
I was also wondering, Is this a blonde joke really?
What exactly was finished at the Cross. Not all things, Heaven and earth are still here. The Prophecies in Revelation have yet to be fulfilled. What does the Messianic prophecies say would be finished? His work as the Prophet. His work as the High Preist. He still has to Reign as our physical King. Also its funny no prophecy says the law will be done away with other than possibly Yeshuas when ALL THINGS are complete, depending if your eiesgenisis shows that. Actually they that say we will keep the law.
Face it, the Law is only convenient when it justifies something like plural marriage. When it is inconvenient, like regarding that ham sammich, it must be disregarded.
The inconsistency of embracing what one wants while ignoring what one doesn't is the epitome of 'lukewarm. '
Now if only we could figure out what the "it" is that he was talking about... must have been His father's rules.Interesting prospective, the New Covenant is a "do over".
Kinda makes the statement, "it is finished" pointless, but that's just me.
@Cap keeping the Law does not now, nor has it ever saved anyone. Period. That is Paul's point.
Not keeping the Law, once you know it is there, is grounds for being cut off. Not keeping the Law is called sin. Willful sin is rebellion....
Why flirt with disaster when the Law is so damn simple?
It's weakness to run to Paul's multicultural letters when one can not find justification from the gospels. I've answered you concerning the verses you quoted in the past so I'm not going to do it now again. It takes a LOT of work to understand Paul, a LOT.I have no idea why this is so hard. I know you have read this. Maybe read it slowly.
Galatians 3
Faith or Works of the Law
1You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified. 2I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by believing what you heard? 3Are you so foolish? After beginning by means of the Spirit, are you now trying to finish by means of the flesh? a 4Have you experienced b so much in vain—if it really was in vain? 5So again I ask, does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law, or by your believing what you heard? 6So also Abraham “believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” c
7Understand, then, that those who have faith are children of Abraham. 8Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: “All nations will be blessed through you.” d 9So those who rely on faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith.
10For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, as it is written: “Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.” e 11Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because “the righteous will live by faith.” f 12The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, it says, “The person who does these things will live by them.” g 13Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.” h 14He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.
The Law and the Promise
15Brothers and sisters, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. 16The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” i meaning one person, who is Christ. 17What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. 18For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on the promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.
(And if you can really understand what is being said here, the New Covenant (Grace/Faith) is really the First Covenant, before the Old Covenant (Law).)
19Why, then, was the law given at all? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come. The law was given through angels and entrusted to a mediator. 20A mediator, however, implies more than one party; but God is one.
21Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law. 22But Scripture has locked up everything under the control of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.
Children of God
23Before the coming of this faith, j we were held in custody under the law, locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed. 24So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. 25Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
26So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. (NOT THE LAW)
(The last part is the uniting of the two houses under Christ. )
Now if only we could figure out what the "it" is that he was talking about... must have been His father's rules.
Yeah, we'll just go with that. Let's "sin that grace may abound" now.
By the way, greetings from the future, it's 2020 here. They lit up the horizon everywhere we could see outside, simply amazing. Pinoys love them some fireworks!
It's weakness to run to Paul's multicultural letters when one can not find justification from the gospels. I've answered you concerning the verses you quoted in the past so I'm not going to do it now again. It takes a LOT of work to understand Paul, a LOT.
I would highly recommend some Peter though:
as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them [Paul's letters] that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability. 2 Peter 3:16-17 ESV
Same goes for you too my friend, "It takes a LOT of work to understand Paul, a LOT. "
But. what I think it takes is the Holy Spirit.
Take a key from Chanukkah, the spirit does not dwell in defiled temples brother.
ok in Love I'll clarify, If there is any Christians, Abraham's children, who think I am wrong, speak up, so I will know if I am hearing correctly.
I actually think that those who follow Torah have a really hard time with Paul and that is why he is so hard for them to understand.
... so I won't follow you down that path; my time is worth more than that.
(your appeal to "fellow Christians", distasteful as it was, also indicates to me you have no real interest in addressing these issues).
exactlyWhat does “Christian” mean?
The thread is titled "Torah vs. Grace" and it's in the Messianic / Hebrew Roots section; so if you're not interested why stir the pot over here in this specific thread? " the lady doth protest too much, methinks."Only framed my statement the way I interpret Paul's comments on the matter. But, you assume correctly, that I am not really interested in pursing this never ending discussion.
It's the Messianic / Hebrew Roots section brother; future readers / posters over here typically are gonna be Law-loving types. No need to inject controversy needlessly which "you aren't really interested in doing."Just wanted to keep sides even since no one else cares to for future readers. Besides, as these things go forward I'm the one who gets called out and no one else does. Can't figure that one out though.
Again, we're in the Messianic section, so you know what "lawless means" ... it means "torahlessness" and since you just mentioned eating pork a few posts prior and I'm familiar with your views on the Law of Gd I don't think that was much of a stretch to insinuate "Torah-lessness" on your part. It wasn't a veiled insult; it was a fact which you have stated; I'm only taking you at your word here.And by the way, your inference that I am lawless, defiled temple, and unintelligent, was distasteful to me first. You're missing the fireworks.
Didn't mean to hurt your feelings. I'll do my best to be more gentle in our future interactions, bliy neder."your inference...was distasteful to me first"
What does “Christian” mean?
If your interpretation of Paul's words contradict Yeshua and the Prophecies about how the Gentiles will be justified by faith, grafting into Ysra'el which is redeemed through the Messiah, Ysra'el Gods nation that He gave His Laws to so that we know what is expected of a citizen, with a circumcised Heart and His Spirit that obeys His Laws Ezekiel 36:26. Then it appears to me that you are twisting his words.Your argument is with Paul not me. I just put down what he said. It seems to me you are twisting his words.
Ezekiel 36:26I think that it is really bothersome, that the Gentiles have received the Spirit beyond the Law, and those who think its in the Law are missing the point and don't like it.