I would say more broadly that "some sort of ... patriarchy is natural", and those who do it well do it "benevolently".
The classic image of a caveman with a club dragging a woman by her hair is not at all what anybody is promoting here - but it is an image that we can understand, because we can see that is how the heart of man works. Everywhere, in secular society as well as in the church, men seek to control women. This is a natural tendency - and the source of a lot of abuse.
The solution is, however, not to oppose nature. Rather, to see how to live in accordance with nature, and do it well. It's just like permaculture - observe nature, and work with it in your garden. In marriage, observe nature (in other words, observe how God has created men and women) and work with it not against it.
Egalitarianism is unnatural - but benevolent existence within the roles nature gives is natural. Just as a communist revolution to make "all men equal" destroys a state and is an unnatural order so cannot last (it naturally just becomes a different heirarchy, with a different leader). While if the original king / nobility / government had simply been benevolent in the first place nobody would have had any cause to revolt. Same goes for marriage.
It's coming. They're not gonna like the beast they are unleashing...View attachment 1828 @Slumberfreeze if you have been hearing about the "disband and reimagine the police" movement i thought you might like this one I made
I have to wonder why the 9 kids only gave her 19 grandchildren. My mother only had six children, but we have exceeded that total! Ditto for why the 19 grandchildren only gaver her 30 great grand-children.
Heaps of possible reasons. Maybe some never married, some were unable to have children, some were only able to have 1 or 2 children, some died young...I have to wonder why the 9 kids only gave her 19 grandchildren. My mother only had six children, but we have exceeded that total! Ditto for why the 19 grandchildren only gaver her 30 great grand-children.
My parents had 7 and 6 siblings. In each family there was one who never married or had children. There was also some with few (1 or 2) and some with more like 7 or nine. I ended up with about 30 cousins on each side of the family....but I think that number is higher then the overall average.Heaps of possible reasons. Maybe some never married, some were unable to have children, some were only able to have 1 or 2 children, some died young...
Also, it's possible the grandchildren haven't stopped producing yet, so 30 great grand-children may increase.
In our experience, most people in Ireland in their 30-40s are one of about a dozen kids, but have only 2 of their own. The culture there changed that much in one generation.