Though there are movements coming from within the earth, they are not the earth itself moving off its foundation. The foundations still hold fast the earth...
...This is consistent.
Thanks, it was a serious question, I appreciate the response, and goes to the heart of a point Samuel raised about understanding Scripture, in light of simile, metaphor, example, and statements of 'fact'. (Or, for those familiar with "PARDES" [sic] - all of the above, often simultaneously.)
As an engineer, with a physics background, I add another element:
"orders of magnitude".
Example (if we believe 'somebody's numbers', admittedly):
Mass of earth (est) - 10 ** 24th kilograms (10 to the 24th power kilograms)
Mass of big human (not nephil) 10**2nd kg
If he jumps (or disobeys Law of Gravity
) off a cliff: impact of two objects...Newton's Laws...
10**24 / 10**2 = about a 1 in 10 ** 22 difference in mass. If we include momentum off a BIG cliff, perhaps a few orders of magnitude less, at most.)
1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (if my eyes don't blur...)
I.E., the "earth is NOT moved". No measurable effect. We perceive NO movement.
Even if it's the biggest object we can imagine moving by man (maybe a pyramid block, even assuming anti-grav by the whatever...
) - it's still MANY orders of magnitude/momentum in mass/MV difference (and even more if the earth is of "infinite" mass) - so, no perceptible, even measurable, except as wavefronts, motion of 'HaEretz'.
I could go on about Galileo, Kepler, retrograde motion, and Occam's Razor (the simplest solution, especially when it comes to the math, is the best - at least for engineers.)
But it boils down to: I can't see, or measure, whether there is any difference in the
postulates (which is what ultimately they boil down to, in the absence of being able to tell.)