Would you re-read my quote? I specifically said “instructions”. Which is beside the point because the Ruach said He commanded them. I mean, you can say something different but I’m going to believe the text over a man’s interpretation.I don't see where you get two sets of 'commandments'. Much less how they differ.
See below.
This is a red herring and has nothing to do with our discussion or my point.Bear in mind, I'm a stickler that the Hebrew word "torah" should be better rendered as "instruction" than "Law." Because it is far more than JUST "statutes, judgments, and commandments."
What’s the point? The scripture I quoted was not a parable. He gave specific commands, no interpretation needed.Remember that Yahushua Himself VERY frequently taught in parables. They applied His commandments to SPECIFIC situations. Like those who are ready for more than "milk" should be able to do.
The text specifically says He commanded them. So I’m confused as to why you say it wasn’t a command. Scripture literally says it was “commanded”.
Mark 6:8-9
[8] And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse: [9] But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
That was temporally the first command. Then later he gave a second different command.
Two sets of commands. The second set of commands/instructions conflicts with the first.Luke 22:36
[36] Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: u and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
His command changed after the passage of time and with a different set of circumstances.
He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. However His commands in this instance clearly are different from one another. That much is clear in the text.