Can someone sum up where we are in this thread. Its long and I hadn't read any comments since the first page.
Can someone sum up where we are in this thread. Its long and I hadn't read any comments since the first page.
Im not going to lie this kind of cracked me upOne side believes one thing and another side believes another and no one is likely to change.
But hey we all believe that we should have more than one wife, at least that's something.
So its just another day on the Forum?One side believes one thing and another side believes another and no one is likely to change.
But hey we all believe that we should have more than one wife, at least that's something.
He said do not add to His word. If He was here to be the perfect example and added to His word then He broke His own words and was not the perfect Example. Its nothing to do with His authority it has to do with His perfect nature.
Exodus 34:15 is a warning to safe guard against being corrupted not a biblical instruction to not eat with Gentiles or enter their homes. Not a legitimate Torah objection.
Peter went to A God fearing Man who wanted to enter covenant with the Lord. Who was eating of the Lord's sacrifice.Exodus 34:15 Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice;
I would say that those who took issue did not know that the Gentiles they were upset about Peter dining with we're seeking God and when he explained that they backed off. The rest is alot of assumption and probalies.I’d argue that the Torah instruction is to keep them from partaking of a feast produced from a sacrifice they had no knowledge of. In the Apostolic era especially, the majority of meats eaten in a Gentiles home came from an idolatrous sacrifice. The Jews knew it, the Gentiles knew it and the Apostles knew it. This is why those of the circumcision were able to sway Peter and Barnabas because they knew that they were probably eating meats offered to idols at some point or contaminated by contact with meats offered to idols.
Let's look at it with more contextWhich gives an interesting comparison to 1 Corinthians 10:25-28 Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
For the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof.
If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake.
But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof:
This instruction is in direct conflict with the Torah instruction about this passage and other kosher passages. Any meat coming from the shambles was certainly unclean even if it wasn’t offered to idols, as it had come into contact with meat that was.
2 things remember their is no need for a sin sacrifice thanks to Yeshua, and this shows that Jews didn't have to be seperated and avoid completely unclean animals, with a few specifically mentioned times to illustrate being set apart, just their carcasses. It goes the same for unbeliever's as well.Leviticus 5;2 Or if a soul touch any unclean thing, whether it be a carcase of an unclean beast, or a carcase of unclean cattle, or the carcase of unclean creeping things, and if it be hidden from him; he also shall be unclean, and guilty.
Context, Please, brother. Your speaking of a something that was a fellowship sacrifice.Leviticus 7:21. Moreover the soul that shall touch any unclean thing, as the uncleanness of man, or any unclean beast, or any abominable unclean thing, and eat of the flesh of the sacrifice of peace offerings, which pertain unto the LORD, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.
I sound like a broken record Context, maybe Ill change my signature to just say Context.Leviticus 11:32-35 even.
And upon whatsoever any of them, when they are dead, doth fall, it shall be unclean; whether it be any vessel of wood, or raiment, or skin, or sack, whatsoever vessel it be, wherein any work is done, it must be put into water, and it shall be unclean until the even; so it shall be cleansed.
And every earthen vessel, whereinto any of them falleth,† whatsoever is in it shall be unclean; and ye shall break it.
Of all meat which may be eaten, that on which such water cometh shall be unclean: and all drink that may be drunk in every such vessel shall be unclean.
And every thing whereupon any part of their carcase falleth shall be unclean; whether it be oven, or ranges for pots, they shall be broken down: for they are unclean, and shall be unclean unto you.
You just Illustrated my point about it being about the year after Tribulations. By they Way, The gematria values of the four letters in the Tetragrammaton (Yod – Hey – Vey – Hey) are 10, 5, 6 and 5. That's 26, It is the number of generation from David to Christ according to Luke and also the number of generations between Moses and Adam. The word "merciful" is used 26 times. You left out That 8 is the number of strings in each corner of the Tzitzit, The sign of His Covenant with Israel. Sometimes God put a pattern in there for us to see sometimes we see a pattern because we need to justify our beliefs.
- it is first seen as the hidden day of Creation. It literally become the day when the first becomes the last and the last becomes the first.
- Eight is a reset number.
- It is the day when life after Creation begins.
- It is specifically the day presenting and celebrating new birth or new life.
- It is also the number of the Tetragrammaton, YHWH.
- It is also utilized in the Shemitah count as beginning a new season of sowing and reaping.
- It is also utilized in the count to Pentecost by counting Sabbaths. Pentecost is literally the 8th Sabbath from Passover which results in a lot of prophetical types and meanings.
- Jubilees are also an instance of an 8th Sabbath, which is a massive reset. No longer do you count your years of sowing and reaping based upon the previous Jubilee, but as free men with all rights restored, your sabbaths are now counted from the zero year of the Jubilee which is the 50th year and 8th sabbath of the previous Jubilee period instead of the 49th year of the previous Jubilee sabbath count.
- It is also prefigured in the 8 Feast or days of a holy convocation, the eighth of which is to be a sabbath forever regardless of the day it lands on.
- It is also exampled in the wedding feast as the day that the bride is presented to the public.
- It is also presented as the day when time will be no more: 1000 years as a day, the 7th day is the Millenial reign of Christ and the 8th “day” time ceases.
- It is also specifically a special day in the sanctification of a priesthood, and a day that must be observed before a priesthood can begin ministering for others.
It is not an equation that makes the instructed servant the equal of the master. But you are forgetting that the Son of man did not come to be served but to serve, He wasn't here as the Master. Its about His nature and the example we were told to follow. He said He does not change we know that to mean His nature. We know The law defined what was sin, that which is sin against Him (His nature) or a sin of Disobedience. Sin is against His nature. We know this because His word tells us this. He said Don't add or subtract from His Word. Yeshua is the example were told to follow. If He set the example that we can change His word that would be a bad example and if we were punished for doing so that would be unjust, therefore changing the nature of God.He never said that He couldn’t add to his word. This is an equation that makes the instructed servant the equal of the master. Especially since Torah (every word that proceeds from the mouth of God) continued to be added to for 1500 years pre Christ, by Christ.
God never says anything about a yearly restart for Shabbat.As you pointed out with your lunar calendar explanation, a 7th day Sabbath can only be observed so far before there is a reset required which obviously necessitates a Sabbath observance on a day that is not a Saturday by our reconning. This can be seen in a monthly count as well as a yearly count as far back as you wanna check.
Miss quoting the Apostles to justify living according to their own understanding and prejudice dosent make them correct. If you don't think there was prejudice reread their writings.However, on this topic of worshipping Christ in any way similar to Judaism, they are all emphatically united in one voice, quoting from the apostles, that Christianity doesnt worship God as the Jews do.
As you pointed out with your lunar calendar explanation, a 7th day Sabbath can only be observed so far before there is a reset required which obviously necessitates a Sabbath observance on a day that is not a Saturday by our reconning. This can be seen in a monthly count as well as a yearly count as far back as you wanna check.
Gold...There are several later writings in which it was brought up about the reconciliation of the eigthday the and Julian calender and the early church founders trying to just that. If you want when I have the time ill look up and send you the discourse about some of the early church founders trying to reconcile the Julian Calander with the eigthday.
I'm not disputing that the eight day is mentioned inscripture, specifically in the last of the great feasts: the feast of booths (Leviticus 23:33 onwards), and circumcision on the eighth day after birth. The priests and Nazirites also had seven days of cleansing before offering sacrifices specifically on the eighth day (Numbers 6, Leviticus 8:33). The early church fathers also attached the significance of to 8 on the Ark, who were “saved through water” to teach water baptism for salvation as well and how we now have a spiritual circumcision of the heart instead of a physical as a new teaching despite it being written in Deut.
I do believe the eight holds some significance but not as a replacement Sabbath, but the related to the new beginning after the seven years of tribulation and in connection to understanding Daniels prophecy and physical Israel's repentance and acceptance of the messiah. For example;
John 20:24-27
24 One of the Twelve, Thomas called the Twin, was not with them when Yeshua came. 25 The other disciples were saying to him, “We’ve seen the Lord!”
But he replied to them, “Unless I see the nail prints in His hands, and put my finger into the mark of the nails, and put my hand in His side, I will never believe!”
26 Eight days later the disciples were again inside, and Thomas was with them. Yeshua comes, despite the locked doors. He stood in their midst and said, “Shalom Aleichem!” 27 Then He said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and look at My hands. Reach out your hand and put it into My side. Stop doubting and believe!”
He didn't believe what was being told to him like Israel didn't.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The early Church Fathers did exactly what Yeshua called out the Pharisees for doing.
Mark 7:8
Having left behind the commandment of God, you hold on to the tradition of men.”
There's no difference between what the Early Church Fathers did and what the Pharisees did. There's no difference in the writings of the Early Church Fathers and Talmud.
The same goes for the writings of the Early Church Fathers. Its great for seeing the culture that gave birth to the Catholic Church and to know where some modern traditions come from (most even those espoused by the Early Church Fathers are Pharisaical teachings just with a Yeshua wrapping). But those traditions are no more biblical instruction than the Talmud is. Traditions are good if they help one grow in faith but not if they conflict with Gods instructions.
We can't even say that the writings of the early Church fathers we're inspired by the Rauch HaKodesh because instructions that conflict with the instructions of The Father don't come from the Ruach. The Father, Son, and Ruach are one they are all in agreeance. If not then its not the Holy Spirit. If one is going to argue that The Holy Spirit can conflict with the Father or Son then your saying God is indecisive at best at worst that they're Separate entities with opposing wills, which would be saying Scripture is wrong when it says God is one.
Just be glad you didn't grow up keeping Romani tradition. 4 days after the new moon is the Sabbath and every 7th day until the new moon is a Sabbath. Why, because the moon didn't come into existence till the 4th day so that would make the 4th day after the new moon the seventh day. Everyone will find something that justifies their belief and cling to it.
I'm not going to change your mind, and your not going to change my mind because I see what they are saying as directly in conflict with God's instruction and the only man (who just so happens to also be Elohim) who I would listen to saying Sunday is the new Sabbath didn't say that but that He was Lord of the Sabbath. So I'm going to bow out of this part of the discussion.
Back to your original post:
These psuedo brethren were also attempting to ostracise Gentile Believers who weren’t Torah observant based on a Torah principle found in Exodus 34:15. This is the same principle that Peter wrestled with personally in chapter 10 and was bludgeoned about the head and shoulders with in Chapter 11:2,3 by those of the circumcision. They didnt back off until Peter used the “God told me too” trump card for their legitimate Torah objections.
The weren't Torah observant. They were following tradition. Exodus 34:15 is a warning to safe guard against being corrupted not a biblical instruction to not eat with Gentiles or enter their homes. Not a legitimate Torah objection. Peter was wrestling with tradition not Torah observance. Paul called Peter out later on his hypocrisy and being afraid of criticism for not following traditions, what the Pharisee called the whole law, as in that it completed God's Law. As for the circumcision, Torah says circumcision of the Heart for Salvation, the physical is not for Salvation and doesn't say that, its for those born into the covenant to show they are in covenant. Not for those grafted in. Missed the eight day mark, and didn't make the cut. The belief that you had to be physically circumcised for Salvation is a tradition. In Acts 15 They were trying to get Paul and Barnabas to teach salvation through Torah they were wrong that's tradition. Ezekiel 14 teaches relationship with God, we see this with Abraham as well, the Torah and Prophets show that salvation comes through relationship with God, before Yeshua it was harder to have that relationship and after Him only He has the authority to intercede on our behalf and our relationship with the Son is how we have a relationship with the Father, because He is the Tabernacle in the flesh. Paul let them know all are saved by the grace of the Yeshua. The judgement was to not trouble new believers beyond their salvation issues. Acts 19 "Therefore, I judge not to trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to God." Difference between milk and meat. I am inclined to say that I believe Galatians 2, Acts 15 and 24 are all talking about the same people. Who were teaching circumcision for salvation, a tradition not a Torah law. It like Christians who teach water baptism for salvation. Tradition, as false teaching.
Galatians 2:4
Now this issue came up because of false brothers secretly brought in (who slipped in to spy out our freedom in Messiah, in order to bring us into bondage).
Yeah they were false brothers who held traditions above the word of God and spreading a false teaching. Also would like to point out that brackets and parenthesis mark commentary not in the original manuscripts. Not the authors words. We should look carefully at the parts when someone adds to the word, it may have a motive behind it.
I've noticed how you slipped in Torah observant instead of certain men like the King James says or circumcised believers as other interpretations use and bludgeoned....not exactly what was expressed, I don't know if you noticed but your bias is hanging out.
For me I don't see the Law as bondage. I find comfort in the fact my life is easier in submitting to His instructions according to Torah because I don't have to interrupt scripture to justify not doing something or why I can do something. I simple do what is clearly instructed in scripture to do and don't do what it says not to do to the best of my abilities. I say the best of my abilities, sometimes I let my flesh get to me but I repent and try to make amends, and I don't go out looking for was to obey Torah instructions that I don't need to. It's not hard to do if you actually want to submit to God. It doesn't restrict important things in my life. I'm free to just praise and worship Him, Free to work for the advancement of His Kingdom, Free to have a family (as large as I want), Free to live my life according to His will. Its easier to discern if its the Rauch guiding me or if something else trying to lead me astray. I've been able to start removing the man made Hedges of tradition that make a labyrinth that had imprisoned me chasing my own tail. That's what the Law of Freedom does, it removes the obstacles that keep you separated from Him.
So much of what is pointed to as teachings against Torah on the forum is actually teachings against traditions that go against Torah or divisive traditions. I'm starting to seriously doubt if some of yall actually know what is Torah and what is just tradition.
If you can make that math work you’re doing better than Moses. That’s why they had a beginning of the year. It’s also why they added 7 extra months over the course of 19 years to the calendar.There is no scriptural command to “reset” the count for the month or year or anything else. Its just work 6 days and Shabbat on the seventh. Perpetually
Or, maybe the seven days is independent of lunar and solar....If you can make that math work you’re doing better than Moses. That’s why they had a beginning of the year. It’s also why they added 7 extra months over the course of 19 years to the calendar.
7 doesn’t go equally into any known solar or lunar cycle or any known observed cycle. Thus a reset principle. Check it out.
Also there was a change in the beginning of the year. From Tishri to Nissan under the Mosaic Covenant
How do you even know what a day is without the sun or the moon?Or, maybe the seven days is independent of lunar and solar....
I again am missing something, the months reset every year with the wheat harvest, the weeks just run on. Where is the problem? Days move around inside the month but everything is pegged with in a certain range because of the yearly reset.If you can make that math work you’re doing better than Moses. That’s why they had a beginning of the year. It’s also why they added 7 extra months over the course of 19 years to the calendar.
7 doesn’t go equally into any known solar or lunar cycle or any known observed cycle. Thus a reset principle. Check it out.
Also there was a change in the beginning of the year. From Tishri to Nissan under the Mosaic Covenant
Can someone sum up where we are in this thread. Its long and I hadn't read any comments since the first page.
That seems a trifle gossamer to me.
I again am missing something, the months reset every year with the wheat harvest, the weeks just run on. Where is the problem? Days move around inside the month but everything is pegged with in a certain range because of the yearly reset.
Peter went to A God fearing Man who wanted to enter covenant with the Lord. Who was eating of the Lord's sacrifice.
Let's look at it with a little more context.
Exodus 34:14-16
14 For you are to bow down to no other god, because Adonai is jealous for His Name—He is a jealous God.
15 “See that you do not make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land. Otherwise when they prostitute themselves with their gods and sacrifice to their gods, someone will invite you, and you will eat from their sacrifice. 16 Do not take their daughters for your sons, for their daughters will prostitute themselves with their own gods, and cause your sons to prostitute themselves with their gods.
Like a said a warning to avoid corruption and committing spiritual adultery against God, referencing back to. Not to refuse Gentiles.